BEN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Blackstone has a net margin of -3.83% compared to Franklin Resources's net margin of 27.05%. Franklin Resources's return on equity of 3.25% beat Blackstone's return on equity of 11.9%.

Franklin Resources has a consensus price target of $20.75, signalling upside risk potential of 4.8%. On the other hand Blackstone has an analysts' consensus of $179.80 which suggests that it could grow by 3.35%. Given that Franklin Resources has higher upside potential than Blackstone, analysts believe Franklin Resources is more attractive than Blackstone.

Franklin Resources has a beta of 1.414, which suggesting that the stock is 41.36% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Blackstone has a beta of 1.529, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.886%.

Franklin Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.31%. Blackstone offers a yield of 1.98% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.86 per share. Franklin Resources pays 141.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Blackstone pays out 306.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Franklin Resources quarterly revenues are $2.2B, which are smaller than Blackstone quarterly revenues of $2.9B. Franklin Resources's net income of -$84.7M is lower than Blackstone's net income of $780.8M. Notably, Franklin Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.02x while Blackstone's PE ratio is 59.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Franklin Resources is 1.19x versus 14.24x for Blackstone. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hamilton Lane has a net margin of -3.83% compared to Franklin Resources's net margin of 36.66%. Franklin Resources's return on equity of 3.25% beat Hamilton Lane's return on equity of 25.11%.

Franklin Resources has a consensus price target of $20.75, signalling upside risk potential of 4.8%. On the other hand Hamilton Lane has an analysts' consensus of $177.17 which suggests that it could grow by 19.76%. Given that Hamilton Lane has higher upside potential than Franklin Resources, analysts believe Hamilton Lane is more attractive than Franklin Resources.

Franklin Resources has a beta of 1.414, which suggesting that the stock is 41.36% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hamilton Lane has a beta of 1.240, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.951%.

Franklin Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.31%. Hamilton Lane offers a yield of 1.3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share. Franklin Resources pays 141.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Hamilton Lane pays out 77.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Hamilton Lane's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Franklin Resources's is not.

Franklin Resources quarterly revenues are $2.2B, which are larger than Hamilton Lane quarterly revenues of $150M. Franklin Resources's net income of -$84.7M is lower than Hamilton Lane's net income of $55M. Notably, Franklin Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.02x while Hamilton Lane's PE ratio is 32.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Franklin Resources is 1.19x versus 12.32x for Hamilton Lane. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lazard has a net margin of -3.83% compared to Franklin Resources's net margin of 13.62%. Franklin Resources's return on equity of 3.25% beat Lazard's return on equity of 43.33%.

Franklin Resources has a consensus price target of $20.75, signalling upside risk potential of 4.8%. On the other hand Lazard has an analysts' consensus of $58.43 which suggests that it could grow by 16.81%. Given that Lazard has higher upside potential than Franklin Resources, analysts believe Lazard is more attractive than Franklin Resources.

Franklin Resources has a beta of 1.414, which suggesting that the stock is 41.36% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lazard has a beta of 1.404, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.381%.

Franklin Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.31%. Lazard offers a yield of 4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Franklin Resources pays 141.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Lazard pays out -229.3% of its earnings as a dividend.

Franklin Resources quarterly revenues are $2.2B, which are larger than Lazard quarterly revenues of $792.4M. Franklin Resources's net income of -$84.7M is lower than Lazard's net income of $107.9M. Notably, Franklin Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.02x while Lazard's PE ratio is 19.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Franklin Resources is 1.19x versus 1.60x for Lazard. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SEI Investments has a net margin of -3.83% compared to Franklin Resources's net margin of 28.82%. Franklin Resources's return on equity of 3.25% beat SEI Investments's return on equity of 24.65%.

Franklin Resources has a consensus price target of $20.75, signalling upside risk potential of 4.8%. On the other hand SEI Investments has an analysts' consensus of $85.60 which suggests that it could grow by 5.06%. Given that SEI Investments has higher upside potential than Franklin Resources, analysts believe SEI Investments is more attractive than Franklin Resources.

Franklin Resources has a beta of 1.414, which suggesting that the stock is 41.36% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SEI Investments has a beta of 0.976, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.369%.

Franklin Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.31%. SEI Investments offers a yield of 1.17% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share. Franklin Resources pays 141.22% of its earnings as a dividend. SEI Investments pays out 24.84% of its earnings as a dividend. SEI Investments's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Franklin Resources's is not.

Franklin Resources quarterly revenues are $2.2B, which are larger than SEI Investments quarterly revenues of $537.4M. Franklin Resources's net income of -$84.7M is lower than SEI Investments's net income of $154.9M. Notably, Franklin Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.02x while SEI Investments's PE ratio is 19.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Franklin Resources is 1.19x versus 5.24x for SEI Investments. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.