CAT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Boeing has a net margin of 14.06% compared to Caterpillar's net margin of -0.19%. Caterpillar's return on equity of 54.17% beat Boeing's return on equity of --.

Caterpillar has a consensus price target of $366.45, signalling upside risk potential of 4.8%. On the other hand Boeing has an analysts' consensus of $200.28 which suggests that it could fall by -2.17%. Given that Caterpillar has higher upside potential than Boeing, analysts believe Caterpillar is more attractive than Boeing.

Caterpillar has a beta of 1.349, which suggesting that the stock is 34.91% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Boeing has a beta of 1.406, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.611%.

Caterpillar has a quarterly dividend of $1.41 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.61%. Boeing offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Caterpillar pays 24.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Boeing pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Caterpillar's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Caterpillar quarterly revenues are $14.2B, which are smaller than Boeing quarterly revenues of $19.5B. Caterpillar's net income of $2B is higher than Boeing's net income of -$37M. Notably, Caterpillar's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.04x while Boeing's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Caterpillar is 2.68x versus 2.01x for Boeing. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Deere & has a net margin of 14.06% compared to Caterpillar's net margin of 10.52%. Caterpillar's return on equity of 54.17% beat Deere &'s return on equity of 27.37%.

Caterpillar has a consensus price target of $366.45, signalling upside risk potential of 4.8%. On the other hand Deere & has an analysts' consensus of $489.89 which suggests that it could fall by -1.53%. Given that Caterpillar has higher upside potential than Deere &, analysts believe Caterpillar is more attractive than Deere &.

Caterpillar has a beta of 1.349, which suggesting that the stock is 34.91% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Deere & has a beta of 1.085, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.499%.

Caterpillar has a quarterly dividend of $1.41 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.61%. Deere & offers a yield of 1.24% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.62 per share. Caterpillar pays 24.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Deere & pays out 22.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Caterpillar quarterly revenues are $14.2B, which are larger than Deere & quarterly revenues of $8.3B. Caterpillar's net income of $2B is higher than Deere &'s net income of $869M. Notably, Caterpillar's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.04x while Deere &'s PE ratio is 22.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Caterpillar is 2.68x versus 2.91x for Deere &. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Manitowoc has a net margin of 14.06% compared to Caterpillar's net margin of -1.34%. Caterpillar's return on equity of 54.17% beat Manitowoc's return on equity of 7.29%.

Caterpillar has a consensus price target of $366.45, signalling upside risk potential of 4.8%. On the other hand Manitowoc has an analysts' consensus of $10.85 which suggests that it could fall by -5.84%. Given that Caterpillar has higher upside potential than Manitowoc, analysts believe Caterpillar is more attractive than Manitowoc.

Caterpillar has a beta of 1.349, which suggesting that the stock is 34.91% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Manitowoc has a beta of 1.916, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 91.58%.

Caterpillar has a quarterly dividend of $1.41 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.61%. Manitowoc offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Caterpillar pays 24.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Manitowoc pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Caterpillar's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Caterpillar quarterly revenues are $14.2B, which are larger than Manitowoc quarterly revenues of $470.9M. Caterpillar's net income of $2B is higher than Manitowoc's net income of -$6.3M. Notably, Caterpillar's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.04x while Manitowoc's PE ratio is 9.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Caterpillar is 2.68x versus 0.19x for Manitowoc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Terex has a net margin of 14.06% compared to Caterpillar's net margin of 1.71%. Caterpillar's return on equity of 54.17% beat Terex's return on equity of 13.48%.

Caterpillar has a consensus price target of $366.45, signalling upside risk potential of 4.8%. On the other hand Terex has an analysts' consensus of $46.41 which suggests that it could fall by -1.22%. Given that Caterpillar has higher upside potential than Terex, analysts believe Caterpillar is more attractive than Terex.

Caterpillar has a beta of 1.349, which suggesting that the stock is 34.91% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Terex has a beta of 1.525, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.522%.

Caterpillar has a quarterly dividend of $1.41 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.61%. Terex offers a yield of 1.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Caterpillar pays 24.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Terex pays out 13.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Caterpillar quarterly revenues are $14.2B, which are larger than Terex quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Caterpillar's net income of $2B is higher than Terex's net income of $21M. Notably, Caterpillar's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.04x while Terex's PE ratio is 12.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Caterpillar is 2.68x versus 0.62x for Terex. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.