FLS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Crane has a net margin of 5.15% compared to Flowserve's net margin of 12.94%. Flowserve's return on equity of 13.38% beat Crane's return on equity of 18.51%.

Flowserve has a consensus price target of $65.20, signalling upside risk potential of 16.59%. On the other hand Crane has an analysts' consensus of $170.00 which suggests that it could grow by 10.63%. Given that Flowserve has higher upside potential than Crane, analysts believe Flowserve is more attractive than Crane.

Flowserve has a beta of 1.418, which suggesting that the stock is 41.803% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Crane has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Flowserve has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.42%. Crane offers a yield of 0.53% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. Flowserve pays 56.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Crane pays out 22.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Flowserve quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Crane quarterly revenues of $597.2M. Flowserve's net income of $58.4M is lower than Crane's net income of $77.3M. Notably, Flowserve's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.21x while Crane's PE ratio is 33.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Flowserve is 1.72x versus 3.92x for Crane. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

IDEX has a net margin of 5.15% compared to Flowserve's net margin of 14.92%. Flowserve's return on equity of 13.38% beat IDEX's return on equity of 13.61%.

Flowserve has a consensus price target of $65.20, signalling upside risk potential of 16.59%. On the other hand IDEX has an analysts' consensus of $234.54 which suggests that it could grow by 12.33%. Given that Flowserve has higher upside potential than IDEX, analysts believe Flowserve is more attractive than IDEX.

Flowserve has a beta of 1.418, which suggesting that the stock is 41.803% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison IDEX has a beta of 0.972, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.827%.

Flowserve has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.42%. IDEX offers a yield of 1.3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.69 per share. Flowserve pays 56.2% of its earnings as a dividend. IDEX pays out 31.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Flowserve quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than IDEX quarterly revenues of $798.2M. Flowserve's net income of $58.4M is lower than IDEX's net income of $119.1M. Notably, Flowserve's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.21x while IDEX's PE ratio is 32.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Flowserve is 1.72x versus 4.96x for IDEX. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ocean Power Technologies has a net margin of 5.15% compared to Flowserve's net margin of -161.83%. Flowserve's return on equity of 13.38% beat Ocean Power Technologies's return on equity of -89.48%.

Flowserve has a consensus price target of $65.20, signalling upside risk potential of 16.59%. On the other hand Ocean Power Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Flowserve has higher upside potential than Ocean Power Technologies, analysts believe Flowserve is more attractive than Ocean Power Technologies.

Flowserve has a beta of 1.418, which suggesting that the stock is 41.803% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ocean Power Technologies has a beta of 2.632, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 163.201%.

Flowserve has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.42%. Ocean Power Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Flowserve pays 56.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Ocean Power Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Flowserve's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Flowserve quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Ocean Power Technologies quarterly revenues of $2.4M. Flowserve's net income of $58.4M is higher than Ocean Power Technologies's net income of -$3.9M. Notably, Flowserve's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.21x while Ocean Power Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Flowserve is 1.72x versus 11.67x for Ocean Power Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SIFCO Industries has a net margin of 5.15% compared to Flowserve's net margin of -15.94%. Flowserve's return on equity of 13.38% beat SIFCO Industries's return on equity of -15.79%.

Flowserve has a consensus price target of $65.20, signalling upside risk potential of 16.59%. On the other hand SIFCO Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 238.49%. Given that SIFCO Industries has higher upside potential than Flowserve, analysts believe SIFCO Industries is more attractive than Flowserve.

Flowserve has a beta of 1.418, which suggesting that the stock is 41.803% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SIFCO Industries has a beta of 1.185, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.531%.

Flowserve has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.42%. SIFCO Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Flowserve pays 56.2% of its earnings as a dividend. SIFCO Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Flowserve's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Flowserve quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than SIFCO Industries quarterly revenues of $2.8M. Flowserve's net income of $58.4M is higher than SIFCO Industries's net income of -$443K. Notably, Flowserve's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.21x while SIFCO Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Flowserve is 1.72x versus 0.35x for SIFCO Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.