INTC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Advanced Micro Devices has a net margin of -0.88% compared to Intel's net margin of 6.29%. Intel's return on equity of -17.02% beat Advanced Micro Devices's return on equity of 2.9%.

Intel has a consensus price target of $22.90, signalling upside risk potential of 2.09%. On the other hand Advanced Micro Devices has an analysts' consensus of $146.53 which suggests that it could grow by 56.22%. Given that Advanced Micro Devices has higher upside potential than Intel, analysts believe Advanced Micro Devices is more attractive than Intel.

Intel has a beta of 1.129, which suggesting that the stock is 12.94% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Advanced Micro Devices has a beta of 1.887, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 88.664%.

Intel has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.23%. Advanced Micro Devices offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Intel pays -8.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Advanced Micro Devices pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Intel quarterly revenues are $14.3B, which are larger than Advanced Micro Devices quarterly revenues of $7.7B. Intel's net income of -$126M is lower than Advanced Micro Devices's net income of $482M. Notably, Intel's price-to-earnings ratio is 95.83x while Advanced Micro Devices's PE ratio is 94.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Intel is 1.81x versus 5.95x for Advanced Micro Devices. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marvell Technology has a net margin of -0.88% compared to Intel's net margin of 11.02%. Intel's return on equity of -17.02% beat Marvell Technology's return on equity of -6.29%.

Intel has a consensus price target of $22.90, signalling upside risk potential of 2.09%. On the other hand Marvell Technology has an analysts' consensus of $112.79 which suggests that it could grow by 102.72%. Given that Marvell Technology has higher upside potential than Intel, analysts believe Marvell Technology is more attractive than Intel.

Intel has a beta of 1.129, which suggesting that the stock is 12.94% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marvell Technology has a beta of 1.781, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 78.133%.

Intel has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.23%. Marvell Technology offers a yield of 0.43% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Intel pays -8.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Marvell Technology pays out -23.45% of its earnings as a dividend.

Intel quarterly revenues are $14.3B, which are larger than Marvell Technology quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Intel's net income of -$126M is lower than Marvell Technology's net income of $200.2M. Notably, Intel's price-to-earnings ratio is 95.83x while Marvell Technology's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Intel is 1.81x versus 8.35x for Marvell Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Micron Technology has a net margin of -0.88% compared to Intel's net margin of 19.66%. Intel's return on equity of -17.02% beat Micron Technology's return on equity of 10.22%.

Intel has a consensus price target of $22.90, signalling upside risk potential of 2.09%. On the other hand Micron Technology has an analysts' consensus of $129.08 which suggests that it could grow by 73.63%. Given that Micron Technology has higher upside potential than Intel, analysts believe Micron Technology is more attractive than Intel.

Intel has a beta of 1.129, which suggesting that the stock is 12.94% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Micron Technology has a beta of 1.180, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.023%.

Intel has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.23%. Micron Technology offers a yield of 0.62% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Intel pays -8.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Micron Technology pays out 65.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Micron Technology's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Intel quarterly revenues are $14.3B, which are larger than Micron Technology quarterly revenues of $8.1B. Intel's net income of -$126M is lower than Micron Technology's net income of $1.6B. Notably, Intel's price-to-earnings ratio is 95.83x while Micron Technology's PE ratio is 17.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Intel is 1.81x versus 2.69x for Micron Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NVIDIA has a net margin of -0.88% compared to Intel's net margin of 56.17%. Intel's return on equity of -17.02% beat NVIDIA's return on equity of 123.32%.

Intel has a consensus price target of $22.90, signalling upside risk potential of 2.09%. On the other hand NVIDIA has an analysts' consensus of $170.01 which suggests that it could grow by 67.01%. Given that NVIDIA has higher upside potential than Intel, analysts believe NVIDIA is more attractive than Intel.

Intel has a beta of 1.129, which suggesting that the stock is 12.94% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NVIDIA has a beta of 1.959, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 95.871%.

Intel has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.23%. NVIDIA offers a yield of 0.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Intel pays -8.53% of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA pays out 1.14% of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Intel quarterly revenues are $14.3B, which are smaller than NVIDIA quarterly revenues of $39.3B. Intel's net income of -$126M is lower than NVIDIA's net income of $22.1B. Notably, Intel's price-to-earnings ratio is 95.83x while NVIDIA's PE ratio is 34.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Intel is 1.81x versus 19.35x for NVIDIA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.