KIM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Essential Properties Realty Trust has a net margin of 31.6% compared to Kimco Realty's net margin of 46.26%. Kimco Realty's return on equity of 3.87% beat Essential Properties Realty Trust's return on equity of 6.24%.

Kimco Realty has a consensus price target of $24.74, signalling upside risk potential of 22.71%. On the other hand Essential Properties Realty Trust has an analysts' consensus of $35.89 which suggests that it could grow by 17.15%. Given that Kimco Realty has higher upside potential than Essential Properties Realty Trust, analysts believe Kimco Realty is more attractive than Essential Properties Realty Trust.

Kimco Realty has a beta of 1.259, which suggesting that the stock is 25.919% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Essential Properties Realty Trust has a beta of 1.075, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.478%.

Kimco Realty has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.86%. Essential Properties Realty Trust offers a yield of 3.82% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Kimco Realty pays 166.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Essential Properties Realty Trust pays out 98.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Essential Properties Realty Trust's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Kimco Realty's is not.

Kimco Realty quarterly revenues are $525.4M, which are larger than Essential Properties Realty Trust quarterly revenues of $119.7M. Kimco Realty's net income of $166M is higher than Essential Properties Realty Trust's net income of $55.4M. Notably, Kimco Realty's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.00x while Essential Properties Realty Trust's PE ratio is 26.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kimco Realty is 6.65x versus 12.07x for Essential Properties Realty Trust. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Global Medical REIT has a net margin of 31.6% compared to Kimco Realty's net margin of 8.1%. Kimco Realty's return on equity of 3.87% beat Global Medical REIT's return on equity of 1.14%.

Kimco Realty has a consensus price target of $24.74, signalling upside risk potential of 22.71%. On the other hand Global Medical REIT has an analysts' consensus of $10.47 which suggests that it could grow by 37.21%. Given that Global Medical REIT has higher upside potential than Kimco Realty, analysts believe Global Medical REIT is more attractive than Kimco Realty.

Kimco Realty has a beta of 1.259, which suggesting that the stock is 25.919% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global Medical REIT has a beta of 1.120, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.028%.

Kimco Realty has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.86%. Global Medical REIT offers a yield of 11.01% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. Kimco Realty pays 166.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Global Medical REIT pays out 990.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kimco Realty quarterly revenues are $525.4M, which are larger than Global Medical REIT quarterly revenues of $35M. Kimco Realty's net income of $166M is higher than Global Medical REIT's net income of $2.8M. Notably, Kimco Realty's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.00x while Global Medical REIT's PE ratio is 763.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kimco Realty is 6.65x versus 3.63x for Global Medical REIT. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Getty Realty has a net margin of 31.6% compared to Kimco Realty's net margin of 42.05%. Kimco Realty's return on equity of 3.87% beat Getty Realty's return on equity of 7.43%.

Kimco Realty has a consensus price target of $24.74, signalling upside risk potential of 22.71%. On the other hand Getty Realty has an analysts' consensus of $33.43 which suggests that it could grow by 18.5%. Given that Kimco Realty has higher upside potential than Getty Realty, analysts believe Kimco Realty is more attractive than Getty Realty.

Kimco Realty has a beta of 1.259, which suggesting that the stock is 25.919% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Getty Realty has a beta of 0.848, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.153%.

Kimco Realty has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.86%. Getty Realty offers a yield of 6.52% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. Kimco Realty pays 166.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Getty Realty pays out 141.01% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kimco Realty quarterly revenues are $525.4M, which are larger than Getty Realty quarterly revenues of $53M. Kimco Realty's net income of $166M is higher than Getty Realty's net income of $22.3M. Notably, Kimco Realty's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.00x while Getty Realty's PE ratio is 22.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kimco Realty is 6.65x versus 7.57x for Getty Realty. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Strawberry Fields REIT has a net margin of 31.6% compared to Kimco Realty's net margin of 4.81%. Kimco Realty's return on equity of 3.87% beat Strawberry Fields REIT's return on equity of 7.19%.

Kimco Realty has a consensus price target of $24.74, signalling upside risk potential of 22.71%. On the other hand Strawberry Fields REIT has an analysts' consensus of $13.86 which suggests that it could grow by 27.13%. Given that Strawberry Fields REIT has higher upside potential than Kimco Realty, analysts believe Strawberry Fields REIT is more attractive than Kimco Realty.

Kimco Realty has a beta of 1.259, which suggesting that the stock is 25.919% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Strawberry Fields REIT has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Kimco Realty has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.86%. Strawberry Fields REIT offers a yield of 4.95% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. Kimco Realty pays 166.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Strawberry Fields REIT pays out 98.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Strawberry Fields REIT's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Kimco Realty's is not.

Kimco Realty quarterly revenues are $525.4M, which are larger than Strawberry Fields REIT quarterly revenues of $30.5M. Kimco Realty's net income of $166M is higher than Strawberry Fields REIT's net income of $1.5M. Notably, Kimco Realty's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.00x while Strawberry Fields REIT's PE ratio is 19.12x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kimco Realty is 6.65x versus 0.66x for Strawberry Fields REIT. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.