LRCX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Advanced Micro Devices has a net margin of 27.22% compared to Lam Research's net margin of 6.29%. Lam Research's return on equity of 51.04% beat Advanced Micro Devices's return on equity of 2.9%.

Lam Research has a consensus price target of $95.41, signalling upside risk potential of 29.54%. On the other hand Advanced Micro Devices has an analysts' consensus of $146.53 which suggests that it could grow by 42.32%. Given that Advanced Micro Devices has higher upside potential than Lam Research, analysts believe Advanced Micro Devices is more attractive than Lam Research.

Lam Research has a beta of 1.524, which suggesting that the stock is 52.416% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Advanced Micro Devices has a beta of 1.887, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 88.664%.

Lam Research has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.21%. Advanced Micro Devices offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lam Research pays 26.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Advanced Micro Devices pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lam Research's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lam Research quarterly revenues are $4.4B, which are smaller than Advanced Micro Devices quarterly revenues of $7.7B. Lam Research's net income of $1.2B is higher than Advanced Micro Devices's net income of $482M. Notably, Lam Research's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.41x while Advanced Micro Devices's PE ratio is 104.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lam Research is 5.94x versus 6.53x for Advanced Micro Devices. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

KLA has a net margin of 27.22% compared to Lam Research's net margin of 26.8%. Lam Research's return on equity of 51.04% beat KLA's return on equity of 96.34%.

Lam Research has a consensus price target of $95.41, signalling upside risk potential of 29.54%. On the other hand KLA has an analysts' consensus of $820.53 which suggests that it could grow by 19.58%. Given that Lam Research has higher upside potential than KLA, analysts believe Lam Research is more attractive than KLA.

Lam Research has a beta of 1.524, which suggesting that the stock is 52.416% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KLA has a beta of 1.370, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.998%.

Lam Research has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.21%. KLA offers a yield of 0.92% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.70 per share. Lam Research pays 26.62% of its earnings as a dividend. KLA pays out 27.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lam Research quarterly revenues are $4.4B, which are larger than KLA quarterly revenues of $3.1B. Lam Research's net income of $1.2B is higher than KLA's net income of $824.5M. Notably, Lam Research's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.41x while KLA's PE ratio is 28.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lam Research is 5.94x versus 8.54x for KLA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marvell Technology has a net margin of 27.22% compared to Lam Research's net margin of 11.02%. Lam Research's return on equity of 51.04% beat Marvell Technology's return on equity of -6.29%.

Lam Research has a consensus price target of $95.41, signalling upside risk potential of 29.54%. On the other hand Marvell Technology has an analysts' consensus of $112.79 which suggests that it could grow by 78.38%. Given that Marvell Technology has higher upside potential than Lam Research, analysts believe Marvell Technology is more attractive than Lam Research.

Lam Research has a beta of 1.524, which suggesting that the stock is 52.416% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marvell Technology has a beta of 1.781, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 78.133%.

Lam Research has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.21%. Marvell Technology offers a yield of 0.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Lam Research pays 26.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Marvell Technology pays out -23.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Lam Research's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lam Research quarterly revenues are $4.4B, which are larger than Marvell Technology quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Lam Research's net income of $1.2B is higher than Marvell Technology's net income of $200.2M. Notably, Lam Research's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.41x while Marvell Technology's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lam Research is 5.94x versus 9.49x for Marvell Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NVIDIA has a net margin of 27.22% compared to Lam Research's net margin of 56.17%. Lam Research's return on equity of 51.04% beat NVIDIA's return on equity of 123.32%.

Lam Research has a consensus price target of $95.41, signalling upside risk potential of 29.54%. On the other hand NVIDIA has an analysts' consensus of $171.01 which suggests that it could grow by 54.88%. Given that NVIDIA has higher upside potential than Lam Research, analysts believe NVIDIA is more attractive than Lam Research.

Lam Research has a beta of 1.524, which suggesting that the stock is 52.416% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NVIDIA has a beta of 1.959, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 95.871%.

Lam Research has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.21%. NVIDIA offers a yield of 0.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Lam Research pays 26.62% of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA pays out 1.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lam Research quarterly revenues are $4.4B, which are smaller than NVIDIA quarterly revenues of $39.3B. Lam Research's net income of $1.2B is lower than NVIDIA's net income of $22.1B. Notably, Lam Research's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.41x while NVIDIA's PE ratio is 37.58x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lam Research is 5.94x versus 20.99x for NVIDIA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.