MA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

PayPal Holdings has a net margin of 45.24% compared to Mastercard's net margin of 16.52%. Mastercard's return on equity of 185.12% beat PayPal Holdings's return on equity of 22.25%.

Mastercard has a consensus price target of $614.79, signalling upside risk potential of 8.56%. On the other hand PayPal Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $82.32 which suggests that it could grow by 19.84%. Given that PayPal Holdings has higher upside potential than Mastercard, analysts believe PayPal Holdings is more attractive than Mastercard.

Mastercard has a beta of 1.059, which suggesting that the stock is 5.937% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PayPal Holdings has a beta of 1.506, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.582%.

Mastercard has a quarterly dividend of $0.76 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.64%. PayPal Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mastercard pays 19.02% of its earnings as a dividend. PayPal Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mastercard's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mastercard quarterly revenues are $7.3B, which are smaller than PayPal Holdings quarterly revenues of $7.8B. Mastercard's net income of $3.3B is higher than PayPal Holdings's net income of $1.3B. Notably, Mastercard's price-to-earnings ratio is 39.71x while PayPal Holdings's PE ratio is 15.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mastercard is 17.96x versus 2.20x for PayPal Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Visa has a net margin of 45.24% compared to Mastercard's net margin of 47.71%. Mastercard's return on equity of 185.12% beat Visa's return on equity of 50.81%.

Mastercard has a consensus price target of $614.79, signalling upside risk potential of 8.56%. On the other hand Visa has an analysts' consensus of $374.25 which suggests that it could grow by 7.64%. Given that Mastercard has higher upside potential than Visa, analysts believe Mastercard is more attractive than Visa.

Mastercard has a beta of 1.059, which suggesting that the stock is 5.937% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Visa has a beta of 0.957, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.345%.

Mastercard has a quarterly dividend of $0.76 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.64%. Visa offers a yield of 0.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.59 per share. Mastercard pays 19.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Visa pays out 21.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mastercard quarterly revenues are $7.3B, which are smaller than Visa quarterly revenues of $9.6B. Mastercard's net income of $3.3B is lower than Visa's net income of $4.6B. Notably, Mastercard's price-to-earnings ratio is 39.71x while Visa's PE ratio is 34.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mastercard is 17.96x versus 18.46x for Visa. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Wells Fargo & has a net margin of 45.24% compared to Mastercard's net margin of 24.29%. Mastercard's return on equity of 185.12% beat Wells Fargo &'s return on equity of 10.99%.

Mastercard has a consensus price target of $614.79, signalling upside risk potential of 8.56%. On the other hand Wells Fargo & has an analysts' consensus of $78.07 which suggests that it could grow by 6.25%. Given that Mastercard has higher upside potential than Wells Fargo &, analysts believe Mastercard is more attractive than Wells Fargo &.

Mastercard has a beta of 1.059, which suggesting that the stock is 5.937% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Wells Fargo & has a beta of 1.134, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.357%.

Mastercard has a quarterly dividend of $0.76 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.64%. Wells Fargo & offers a yield of 2.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Mastercard pays 19.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Wells Fargo & pays out 31.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mastercard quarterly revenues are $7.3B, which are smaller than Wells Fargo & quarterly revenues of $20.1B. Mastercard's net income of $3.3B is lower than Wells Fargo &'s net income of $4.9B. Notably, Mastercard's price-to-earnings ratio is 39.71x while Wells Fargo &'s PE ratio is 13.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mastercard is 17.96x versus 3.06x for Wells Fargo &. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Western Union has a net margin of 45.24% compared to Mastercard's net margin of 12.56%. Mastercard's return on equity of 185.12% beat The Western Union's return on equity of 134.57%.

Mastercard has a consensus price target of $614.79, signalling upside risk potential of 8.56%. On the other hand The Western Union has an analysts' consensus of $11.13 which suggests that it could grow by 16.61%. Given that The Western Union has higher upside potential than Mastercard, analysts believe The Western Union is more attractive than Mastercard.

Mastercard has a beta of 1.059, which suggesting that the stock is 5.937% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Western Union has a beta of 0.722, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.841%.

Mastercard has a quarterly dividend of $0.76 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.64%. The Western Union offers a yield of 9.85% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. Mastercard pays 19.02% of its earnings as a dividend. The Western Union pays out 34.42% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mastercard quarterly revenues are $7.3B, which are larger than The Western Union quarterly revenues of $983.6M. Mastercard's net income of $3.3B is higher than The Western Union's net income of $123.5M. Notably, Mastercard's price-to-earnings ratio is 39.71x while The Western Union's PE ratio is 3.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mastercard is 17.96x versus 0.78x for The Western Union. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.