NI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

DTE Energy has a net margin of 7.96% compared to NiSource's net margin of 16.41%. NiSource's return on equity of 8.09% beat DTE Energy's return on equity of 13.72%.

NiSource has a consensus price target of $38.12, signalling upside risk potential of 4.57%. On the other hand DTE Energy has an analysts' consensus of $136.54 which suggests that it could grow by 13.12%. Given that DTE Energy has higher upside potential than NiSource, analysts believe DTE Energy is more attractive than NiSource.

NiSource has a beta of 0.537, which suggesting that the stock is 46.282% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DTE Energy has a beta of 0.677, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.283%.

NiSource has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.91%. DTE Energy offers a yield of 3.43% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.09 per share. NiSource pays 64.02% of its earnings as a dividend. DTE Energy pays out 53.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

NiSource quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are smaller than DTE Energy quarterly revenues of $2.9B. NiSource's net income of $85.7M is lower than DTE Energy's net income of $477M. Notably, NiSource's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.09x while DTE Energy's PE ratio is 16.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NiSource is 3.11x versus 2.02x for DTE Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PPL has a net margin of 7.96% compared to NiSource's net margin of 10.36%. NiSource's return on equity of 8.09% beat PPL's return on equity of 5.87%.

NiSource has a consensus price target of $38.12, signalling upside risk potential of 4.57%. On the other hand PPL has an analysts' consensus of $35.13 which suggests that it could grow by 9.21%. Given that PPL has higher upside potential than NiSource, analysts believe PPL is more attractive than NiSource.

NiSource has a beta of 0.537, which suggesting that the stock is 46.282% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PPL has a beta of 0.831, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.902%.

NiSource has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.91%. PPL offers a yield of 3.2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share. NiSource pays 64.02% of its earnings as a dividend. PPL pays out 95.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

NiSource quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are smaller than PPL quarterly revenues of $2.1B. NiSource's net income of $85.7M is lower than PPL's net income of $214M. Notably, NiSource's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.09x while PPL's PE ratio is 28.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NiSource is 3.11x versus 2.87x for PPL. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Southern has a net margin of 7.96% compared to NiSource's net margin of 21.1%. NiSource's return on equity of 8.09% beat Southern's return on equity of 13.18%.

NiSource has a consensus price target of $38.12, signalling upside risk potential of 4.57%. On the other hand Southern has an analysts' consensus of $90.75 which suggests that it could grow by 9.31%. Given that Southern has higher upside potential than NiSource, analysts believe Southern is more attractive than NiSource.

NiSource has a beta of 0.537, which suggesting that the stock is 46.282% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Southern has a beta of 0.521, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.885%.

NiSource has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.91%. Southern offers a yield of 3.42% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.72 per share. NiSource pays 64.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Southern pays out 76.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

NiSource quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are smaller than Southern quarterly revenues of $7.3B. NiSource's net income of $85.7M is lower than Southern's net income of $1.5B. Notably, NiSource's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.09x while Southern's PE ratio is 19.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NiSource is 3.11x versus 3.46x for Southern. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Xcel Energy has a net margin of 7.96% compared to NiSource's net margin of 18.72%. NiSource's return on equity of 8.09% beat Xcel Energy's return on equity of 10.44%.

NiSource has a consensus price target of $38.12, signalling upside risk potential of 4.57%. On the other hand Xcel Energy has an analysts' consensus of $71.75 which suggests that it could grow by 9.03%. Given that Xcel Energy has higher upside potential than NiSource, analysts believe Xcel Energy is more attractive than NiSource.

NiSource has a beta of 0.537, which suggesting that the stock is 46.282% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Xcel Energy has a beta of 0.421, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.9%.

NiSource has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.91%. Xcel Energy offers a yield of 3.3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share. NiSource pays 64.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Xcel Energy pays out 61.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

NiSource quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are smaller than Xcel Energy quarterly revenues of $3.6B. NiSource's net income of $85.7M is lower than Xcel Energy's net income of $682M. Notably, NiSource's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.09x while Xcel Energy's PE ratio is 19.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NiSource is 3.11x versus 2.69x for Xcel Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.