OI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Luminar Technologies has a net margin of -10.07% compared to O-I Glass's net margin of -196.68%. O-I Glass's return on equity of -6.66% beat Luminar Technologies's return on equity of --.

O-I Glass has a consensus price target of $15.60, signalling upside risk potential of 39.16%. On the other hand Luminar Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $22.40 which suggests that it could grow by 348%. Given that Luminar Technologies has higher upside potential than O-I Glass, analysts believe Luminar Technologies is more attractive than O-I Glass.

O-I Glass has a beta of 0.982, which suggesting that the stock is 1.821% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Luminar Technologies has a beta of 1.865, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 86.529%.

O-I Glass has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Luminar Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. O-I Glass pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Luminar Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

O-I Glass quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than Luminar Technologies quarterly revenues of $22.5M. O-I Glass's net income of -$154M is lower than Luminar Technologies's net income of -$44.2M. Notably, O-I Glass's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Luminar Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for O-I Glass is 0.27x versus 2.10x for Luminar Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mattel has a net margin of -10.07% compared to O-I Glass's net margin of 8.56%. O-I Glass's return on equity of -6.66% beat Mattel's return on equity of 25.26%.

O-I Glass has a consensus price target of $15.60, signalling upside risk potential of 39.16%. On the other hand Mattel has an analysts' consensus of $25.58 which suggests that it could grow by 54.09%. Given that Mattel has higher upside potential than O-I Glass, analysts believe Mattel is more attractive than O-I Glass.

O-I Glass has a beta of 0.982, which suggesting that the stock is 1.821% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mattel has a beta of 0.508, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.181%.

O-I Glass has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Mattel offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. O-I Glass pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mattel pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

O-I Glass quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are smaller than Mattel quarterly revenues of $1.6B. O-I Glass's net income of -$154M is lower than Mattel's net income of $140.9M. Notably, O-I Glass's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Mattel's PE ratio is 10.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for O-I Glass is 0.27x versus 1.06x for Mattel. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Northann has a net margin of -10.07% compared to O-I Glass's net margin of --. O-I Glass's return on equity of -6.66% beat Northann's return on equity of --.

O-I Glass has a consensus price target of $15.60, signalling upside risk potential of 39.16%. On the other hand Northann has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that O-I Glass has higher upside potential than Northann, analysts believe O-I Glass is more attractive than Northann.

O-I Glass has a beta of 0.982, which suggesting that the stock is 1.821% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Northann has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

O-I Glass has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Northann offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. O-I Glass pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Northann pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

O-I Glass quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than Northann quarterly revenues of --. O-I Glass's net income of -$154M is higher than Northann's net income of --. Notably, O-I Glass's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Northann's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for O-I Glass is 0.27x versus 0.38x for Northann. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rivian Automotive has a net margin of -10.07% compared to O-I Glass's net margin of -42.85%. O-I Glass's return on equity of -6.66% beat Rivian Automotive's return on equity of -65.03%.

O-I Glass has a consensus price target of $15.60, signalling upside risk potential of 39.16%. On the other hand Rivian Automotive has an analysts' consensus of $14.67 which suggests that it could grow by 27.24%. Given that O-I Glass has higher upside potential than Rivian Automotive, analysts believe O-I Glass is more attractive than Rivian Automotive.

O-I Glass has a beta of 0.982, which suggesting that the stock is 1.821% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rivian Automotive has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

O-I Glass has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Rivian Automotive offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. O-I Glass pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rivian Automotive pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

O-I Glass quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are smaller than Rivian Automotive quarterly revenues of $1.7B. O-I Glass's net income of -$154M is higher than Rivian Automotive's net income of -$743M. Notably, O-I Glass's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Rivian Automotive's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for O-I Glass is 0.27x versus 2.35x for Rivian Automotive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.