PSX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Chevron has a net margin of 1.6% compared to Phillips 66's net margin of 7.59%. Phillips 66's return on equity of 6.28% beat Chevron's return on equity of 10.01%.

Phillips 66 has a consensus price target of $129.75, signalling upside risk potential of 3.33%. On the other hand Chevron has an analysts' consensus of $164.08 which suggests that it could grow by 15.27%. Given that Chevron has higher upside potential than Phillips 66, analysts believe Chevron is more attractive than Phillips 66.

Phillips 66 has a beta of 1.012, which suggesting that the stock is 1.212% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chevron has a beta of 0.833, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.684%.

Phillips 66 has a quarterly dividend of $1.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.66%. Chevron offers a yield of 4.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.71 per share. Phillips 66 pays 88.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Chevron pays out 66.82% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Phillips 66 quarterly revenues are $30.4B, which are smaller than Chevron quarterly revenues of $46.1B. Phillips 66's net income of $487M is lower than Chevron's net income of $3.5B. Notably, Phillips 66's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.60x while Chevron's PE ratio is 16.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Phillips 66 is 0.38x versus 1.32x for Chevron. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marathon Petroleum has a net margin of 1.6% compared to Phillips 66's net margin of -0.24%. Phillips 66's return on equity of 6.28% beat Marathon Petroleum's return on equity of 9.28%.

Phillips 66 has a consensus price target of $129.75, signalling upside risk potential of 3.33%. On the other hand Marathon Petroleum has an analysts' consensus of $160.18 which suggests that it could fall by -1.64%. Given that Phillips 66 has higher upside potential than Marathon Petroleum, analysts believe Phillips 66 is more attractive than Marathon Petroleum.

Phillips 66 has a beta of 1.012, which suggesting that the stock is 1.212% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marathon Petroleum has a beta of 0.867, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.254%.

Phillips 66 has a quarterly dividend of $1.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.66%. Marathon Petroleum offers a yield of 2.13% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.91 per share. Phillips 66 pays 88.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Marathon Petroleum pays out 33.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Phillips 66 quarterly revenues are $30.4B, which are smaller than Marathon Petroleum quarterly revenues of $31.5B. Phillips 66's net income of $487M is higher than Marathon Petroleum's net income of -$74M. Notably, Phillips 66's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.60x while Marathon Petroleum's PE ratio is 22.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Phillips 66 is 0.38x versus 0.39x for Marathon Petroleum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Valero Energy has a net margin of 1.6% compared to Phillips 66's net margin of -1.97%. Phillips 66's return on equity of 6.28% beat Valero Energy's return on equity of 3.35%.

Phillips 66 has a consensus price target of $129.75, signalling upside risk potential of 3.33%. On the other hand Valero Energy has an analysts' consensus of $142.82 which suggests that it could grow by 5.71%. Given that Valero Energy has higher upside potential than Phillips 66, analysts believe Valero Energy is more attractive than Phillips 66.

Phillips 66 has a beta of 1.012, which suggesting that the stock is 1.212% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Valero Energy has a beta of 0.980, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.044%.

Phillips 66 has a quarterly dividend of $1.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.66%. Valero Energy offers a yield of 3.21% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.13 per share. Phillips 66 pays 88.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Valero Energy pays out 49.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Phillips 66 quarterly revenues are $30.4B, which are larger than Valero Energy quarterly revenues of $30.3B. Phillips 66's net income of $487M is higher than Valero Energy's net income of -$595M. Notably, Phillips 66's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.60x while Valero Energy's PE ratio is 47.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Phillips 66 is 0.38x versus 0.33x for Valero Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Exxon Mobil has a net margin of 1.6% compared to Phillips 66's net margin of 9.52%. Phillips 66's return on equity of 6.28% beat Exxon Mobil's return on equity of 12.7%.

Phillips 66 has a consensus price target of $129.75, signalling upside risk potential of 3.33%. On the other hand Exxon Mobil has an analysts' consensus of $123.87 which suggests that it could grow by 13.16%. Given that Exxon Mobil has higher upside potential than Phillips 66, analysts believe Exxon Mobil is more attractive than Phillips 66.

Phillips 66 has a beta of 1.012, which suggesting that the stock is 1.212% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Exxon Mobil has a beta of 0.509, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.105%.

Phillips 66 has a quarterly dividend of $1.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.66%. Exxon Mobil offers a yield of 3.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.99 per share. Phillips 66 pays 88.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Exxon Mobil pays out 49.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Phillips 66 quarterly revenues are $30.4B, which are smaller than Exxon Mobil quarterly revenues of $81.1B. Phillips 66's net income of $487M is lower than Exxon Mobil's net income of $7.7B. Notably, Phillips 66's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.60x while Exxon Mobil's PE ratio is 14.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Phillips 66 is 0.38x versus 1.41x for Exxon Mobil. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.