PX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Hennessy Advisors has a net margin of 6.21% compared to P10's net margin of 29.19%. P10's return on equity of 4.67% beat Hennessy Advisors's return on equity of 9.66%.

P10 has a consensus price target of $15.75, signalling upside risk potential of 49.57%. On the other hand Hennessy Advisors has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 138.45%. Given that Hennessy Advisors has higher upside potential than P10, analysts believe Hennessy Advisors is more attractive than P10.

P10 has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hennessy Advisors has a beta of 0.711, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.886%.

P10 has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.33%. Hennessy Advisors offers a yield of 5.52% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. P10 pays 82.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Hennessy Advisors pays out 58.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

P10 quarterly revenues are $85M, which are larger than Hennessy Advisors quarterly revenues of $9.7M. P10's net income of $5.3M is higher than Hennessy Advisors's net income of $2.8M. Notably, P10's price-to-earnings ratio is 70.20x while Hennessy Advisors's PE ratio is 8.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for P10 is 4.28x versus 2.33x for Hennessy Advisors. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Principal Financial Group has a net margin of 6.21% compared to P10's net margin of 19.05%. P10's return on equity of 4.67% beat Principal Financial Group's return on equity of 13.73%.

P10 has a consensus price target of $15.75, signalling upside risk potential of 49.57%. On the other hand Principal Financial Group has an analysts' consensus of $88.08 which suggests that it could grow by 11.04%. Given that P10 has higher upside potential than Principal Financial Group, analysts believe P10 is more attractive than Principal Financial Group.

P10 has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Principal Financial Group has a beta of 1.014, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.403%.

P10 has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.33%. Principal Financial Group offers a yield of 3.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share. P10 pays 82.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Principal Financial Group pays out 41.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

P10 quarterly revenues are $85M, which are smaller than Principal Financial Group quarterly revenues of $4.8B. P10's net income of $5.3M is lower than Principal Financial Group's net income of $905.4M. Notably, P10's price-to-earnings ratio is 70.20x while Principal Financial Group's PE ratio is 11.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for P10 is 4.28x versus 1.15x for Principal Financial Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SEI Investments has a net margin of 6.21% compared to P10's net margin of 27.96%. P10's return on equity of 4.67% beat SEI Investments's return on equity of 25.84%.

P10 has a consensus price target of $15.75, signalling upside risk potential of 49.57%. On the other hand SEI Investments has an analysts' consensus of $88.17 which suggests that it could grow by 19.97%. Given that P10 has higher upside potential than SEI Investments, analysts believe P10 is more attractive than SEI Investments.

P10 has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SEI Investments has a beta of 0.896, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.448%.

P10 has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.33%. SEI Investments offers a yield of 1.29% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share. P10 pays 82.83% of its earnings as a dividend. SEI Investments pays out 20.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

P10 quarterly revenues are $85M, which are smaller than SEI Investments quarterly revenues of $557.2M. P10's net income of $5.3M is lower than SEI Investments's net income of $155.8M. Notably, P10's price-to-earnings ratio is 70.20x while SEI Investments's PE ratio is 16.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for P10 is 4.28x versus 4.56x for SEI Investments. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

T. Rowe Price Group has a net margin of 6.21% compared to P10's net margin of 24.11%. P10's return on equity of 4.67% beat T. Rowe Price Group's return on equity of 19.29%.

P10 has a consensus price target of $15.75, signalling upside risk potential of 49.57%. On the other hand T. Rowe Price Group has an analysts' consensus of $107.54 which suggests that it could grow by 24.73%. Given that P10 has higher upside potential than T. Rowe Price Group, analysts believe P10 is more attractive than T. Rowe Price Group.

P10 has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison T. Rowe Price Group has a beta of 1.506, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.601%.

P10 has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.33%. T. Rowe Price Group offers a yield of 5.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.27 per share. P10 pays 82.83% of its earnings as a dividend. T. Rowe Price Group pays out 54.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

P10 quarterly revenues are $85M, which are smaller than T. Rowe Price Group quarterly revenues of $1.8B. P10's net income of $5.3M is lower than T. Rowe Price Group's net income of $439.9M. Notably, P10's price-to-earnings ratio is 70.20x while T. Rowe Price Group's PE ratio is 9.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for P10 is 4.28x versus 2.71x for T. Rowe Price Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.