SLB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Core Laboratories has a net margin of 12.95% compared to Schlumberger's net margin of 8.74%. Schlumberger's return on equity of 20.73% beat Core Laboratories's return on equity of 10.93%.

Schlumberger has a consensus price target of $55.49, signalling upside risk potential of 40.96%. On the other hand Core Laboratories has an analysts' consensus of $20.71 which suggests that it could grow by 4.45%. Given that Schlumberger has higher upside potential than Core Laboratories, analysts believe Schlumberger is more attractive than Core Laboratories.

Schlumberger has a beta of 1.524, which suggesting that the stock is 52.415% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Core Laboratories has a beta of 2.388, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 138.847%.

Schlumberger has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.79%. Core Laboratories offers a yield of 0.22% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Schlumberger pays 31.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Core Laboratories pays out 5.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Schlumberger quarterly revenues are $9.2B, which are larger than Core Laboratories quarterly revenues of $134.4M. Schlumberger's net income of $1.2B is higher than Core Laboratories's net income of $11.7M. Notably, Schlumberger's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.66x while Core Laboratories's PE ratio is 33.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Schlumberger is 1.58x versus 1.69x for Core Laboratories. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Halliburton has a net margin of 12.95% compared to Schlumberger's net margin of 10.02%. Schlumberger's return on equity of 20.73% beat Halliburton's return on equity of 26.15%.

Schlumberger has a consensus price target of $55.49, signalling upside risk potential of 40.96%. On the other hand Halliburton has an analysts' consensus of $37.06 which suggests that it could grow by 33.55%. Given that Schlumberger has higher upside potential than Halliburton, analysts believe Schlumberger is more attractive than Halliburton.

Schlumberger has a beta of 1.524, which suggesting that the stock is 52.415% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Halliburton has a beta of 1.912, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 91.19%.

Schlumberger has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.79%. Halliburton offers a yield of 2.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Schlumberger pays 31.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Halliburton pays out 21.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Schlumberger quarterly revenues are $9.2B, which are larger than Halliburton quarterly revenues of $5.7B. Schlumberger's net income of $1.2B is higher than Halliburton's net income of $571M. Notably, Schlumberger's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.66x while Halliburton's PE ratio is 9.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Schlumberger is 1.58x versus 1.07x for Halliburton. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kinder Morgan has a net margin of 12.95% compared to Schlumberger's net margin of 16.9%. Schlumberger's return on equity of 20.73% beat Kinder Morgan's return on equity of 8.01%.

Schlumberger has a consensus price target of $55.49, signalling upside risk potential of 40.96%. On the other hand Kinder Morgan has an analysts' consensus of $26.53 which suggests that it could fall by -4.62%. Given that Schlumberger has higher upside potential than Kinder Morgan, analysts believe Schlumberger is more attractive than Kinder Morgan.

Schlumberger has a beta of 1.524, which suggesting that the stock is 52.415% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kinder Morgan has a beta of 0.943, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.748%.

Schlumberger has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.79%. Kinder Morgan offers a yield of 4.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. Schlumberger pays 31.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Kinder Morgan pays out 105.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Schlumberger's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Kinder Morgan's is not.

Schlumberger quarterly revenues are $9.2B, which are larger than Kinder Morgan quarterly revenues of $3.7B. Schlumberger's net income of $1.2B is higher than Kinder Morgan's net income of $625M. Notably, Schlumberger's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.66x while Kinder Morgan's PE ratio is 24.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Schlumberger is 1.58x versus 4.08x for Kinder Morgan. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Weatherford International PLC has a net margin of 12.95% compared to Schlumberger's net margin of 11.14%. Schlumberger's return on equity of 20.73% beat Weatherford International PLC's return on equity of 49.62%.

Schlumberger has a consensus price target of $55.49, signalling upside risk potential of 40.96%. On the other hand Weatherford International PLC has an analysts' consensus of $107.89 which suggests that it could grow by 44.24%. Given that Weatherford International PLC has higher upside potential than Schlumberger, analysts believe Weatherford International PLC is more attractive than Schlumberger.

Schlumberger has a beta of 1.524, which suggesting that the stock is 52.415% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Weatherford International PLC has a beta of 1.763, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 76.271%.

Schlumberger has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.79%. Weatherford International PLC offers a yield of 0.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Schlumberger pays 31.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Weatherford International PLC pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Schlumberger's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Schlumberger quarterly revenues are $9.2B, which are larger than Weatherford International PLC quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Schlumberger's net income of $1.2B is higher than Weatherford International PLC's net income of $157M. Notably, Schlumberger's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.66x while Weatherford International PLC's PE ratio is 10.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Schlumberger is 1.58x versus 1.02x for Weatherford International PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.