Financhill
Sell
47

STZ Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$187.59
Seasonality move :
6.71%
Day range:
$185.03 - $187.99
52-week range:
$160.46 - $265.70
Dividend yield:
2.16%
P/E ratio:
49.30x
P/S ratio:
3.34x
P/B ratio:
4.85x
Volume:
1.6M
Avg. volume:
2.4M
1-year change:
-28.31%
Market cap:
$33.4B
Revenue:
$10.2B
EPS (TTM):
-$0.51

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
STZ
Constellation Brands
$2.1B $2.27 -3.83% -28.86% $216.09
BF.B
Brown-Forman
$1.1B $0.46 0.31% -38.58% $40.16
KO
Coca-Cola
$11.2B $0.72 1.79% 50.98% $75.68
PEP
PepsiCo
$17.7B $1.49 -0.82% 3.16% $159.32
SAM
Boston Beer
$435.2M $0.69 2.4% -34.88% $264.94
TAP
Molson Coors Beverage
$2.4B $0.81 -0.65% 0.44% $66.71
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
STZ
Constellation Brands
$187.50 $216.09 $33.4B 49.30x $1.01 2.16% 3.34x
BF.B
Brown-Forman
$34.61 $40.16 $16.4B 16.56x $0.23 2.57% 4.05x
KO
Coca-Cola
$72.52 $75.68 $312.1B 29.36x $0.51 2.71% 6.66x
PEP
PepsiCo
$135.31 $159.32 $185.6B 19.47x $1.36 4.01% 2.03x
SAM
Boston Beer
$242.40 $264.94 $2.7B 49.37x $0.00 0% 1.42x
TAP
Molson Coors Beverage
$58.35 $66.71 $11.8B 10.91x $0.47 3.07% 1.05x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
STZ
Constellation Brands
62.56% 0.305 36.47% 0.26x
BF.B
Brown-Forman
42.82% -0.045 18.38% 1.19x
KO
Coca-Cola
64.17% 0.102 16.53% 0.72x
PEP
PepsiCo
71.06% -0.008 22.13% 0.62x
SAM
Boston Beer
-- 0.920 -- 1.21x
TAP
Molson Coors Beverage
31.95% 0.861 51.2% 0.60x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
STZ
Constellation Brands
$1.1B $609.4M -0.4% -0.93% -11.2% $312.1M
BF.B
Brown-Forman
$619M $311M 14.76% 27.85% 35.07% $272M
KO
Coca-Cola
$6.9B $2.9B 14.91% 38.7% 28.04% $3.1B
PEP
PepsiCo
$14.6B $2.3B 14.99% 50.31% 7.46% $3.8B
SAM
Boston Beer
$160.7M -$26.5M 5.86% 5.86% -6.6% $18.4M
TAP
Molson Coors Beverage
$1B $387.8M 5.66% 8.35% 13.07% $383.4M

Constellation Brands vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns STZ or BF.B?

    Brown-Forman has a net margin of -17.34% compared to Constellation Brands's net margin of 26.09%. Constellation Brands's return on equity of -0.93% beat Brown-Forman's return on equity of 27.85%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    STZ
    Constellation Brands
    51.51% -$2.09 $18.6B
    BF.B
    Brown-Forman
    59.81% $0.57 $6.7B
  • What do Analysts Say About STZ or BF.B?

    Constellation Brands has a consensus price target of $216.09, signalling upside risk potential of 15.25%. On the other hand Brown-Forman has an analysts' consensus of $40.16 which suggests that it could grow by 16.03%. Given that Brown-Forman has higher upside potential than Constellation Brands, analysts believe Brown-Forman is more attractive than Constellation Brands.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    STZ
    Constellation Brands
    8 11 0
    BF.B
    Brown-Forman
    2 10 2
  • Is STZ or BF.B More Risky?

    Constellation Brands has a beta of 0.796, which suggesting that the stock is 20.376% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Brown-Forman has a beta of 0.694, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.644%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock STZ or BF.B?

    Constellation Brands has a quarterly dividend of $1.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.16%. Brown-Forman offers a yield of 2.57% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Constellation Brands pays -899.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Brown-Forman pays out 39.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Brown-Forman's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios STZ or BF.B?

    Constellation Brands quarterly revenues are $2.2B, which are larger than Brown-Forman quarterly revenues of $1B. Constellation Brands's net income of -$375.3M is lower than Brown-Forman's net income of $270M. Notably, Constellation Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is 49.30x while Brown-Forman's PE ratio is 16.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Constellation Brands is 3.34x versus 4.05x for Brown-Forman. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    STZ
    Constellation Brands
    3.34x 49.30x $2.2B -$375.3M
    BF.B
    Brown-Forman
    4.05x 16.56x $1B $270M
  • Which has Higher Returns STZ or KO?

    Coca-Cola has a net margin of -17.34% compared to Constellation Brands's net margin of 19.01%. Constellation Brands's return on equity of -0.93% beat Coca-Cola's return on equity of 38.7%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    STZ
    Constellation Brands
    51.51% -$2.09 $18.6B
    KO
    Coca-Cola
    60.04% $0.51 $70.9B
  • What do Analysts Say About STZ or KO?

    Constellation Brands has a consensus price target of $216.09, signalling upside risk potential of 15.25%. On the other hand Coca-Cola has an analysts' consensus of $75.68 which suggests that it could grow by 4.35%. Given that Constellation Brands has higher upside potential than Coca-Cola, analysts believe Constellation Brands is more attractive than Coca-Cola.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    STZ
    Constellation Brands
    8 11 0
    KO
    Coca-Cola
    14 4 0
  • Is STZ or KO More Risky?

    Constellation Brands has a beta of 0.796, which suggesting that the stock is 20.376% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Coca-Cola has a beta of 0.453, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.72%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock STZ or KO?

    Constellation Brands has a quarterly dividend of $1.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.16%. Coca-Cola offers a yield of 2.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share. Constellation Brands pays -899.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Coca-Cola pays out 78.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Coca-Cola's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios STZ or KO?

    Constellation Brands quarterly revenues are $2.2B, which are smaller than Coca-Cola quarterly revenues of $11.5B. Constellation Brands's net income of -$375.3M is lower than Coca-Cola's net income of $2.2B. Notably, Constellation Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is 49.30x while Coca-Cola's PE ratio is 29.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Constellation Brands is 3.34x versus 6.66x for Coca-Cola. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    STZ
    Constellation Brands
    3.34x 49.30x $2.2B -$375.3M
    KO
    Coca-Cola
    6.66x 29.36x $11.5B $2.2B
  • Which has Higher Returns STZ or PEP?

    PepsiCo has a net margin of -17.34% compared to Constellation Brands's net margin of 5.48%. Constellation Brands's return on equity of -0.93% beat PepsiCo's return on equity of 50.31%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    STZ
    Constellation Brands
    51.51% -$2.09 $18.6B
    PEP
    PepsiCo
    52.56% $1.11 $62.5B
  • What do Analysts Say About STZ or PEP?

    Constellation Brands has a consensus price target of $216.09, signalling upside risk potential of 15.25%. On the other hand PepsiCo has an analysts' consensus of $159.32 which suggests that it could grow by 17.75%. Given that PepsiCo has higher upside potential than Constellation Brands, analysts believe PepsiCo is more attractive than Constellation Brands.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    STZ
    Constellation Brands
    8 11 0
    PEP
    PepsiCo
    3 16 1
  • Is STZ or PEP More Risky?

    Constellation Brands has a beta of 0.796, which suggesting that the stock is 20.376% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PepsiCo has a beta of 0.492, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.787%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock STZ or PEP?

    Constellation Brands has a quarterly dividend of $1.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.16%. PepsiCo offers a yield of 4.01% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.36 per share. Constellation Brands pays -899.02% of its earnings as a dividend. PepsiCo pays out 75.48% of its earnings as a dividend. PepsiCo's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios STZ or PEP?

    Constellation Brands quarterly revenues are $2.2B, which are smaller than PepsiCo quarterly revenues of $27.8B. Constellation Brands's net income of -$375.3M is lower than PepsiCo's net income of $1.5B. Notably, Constellation Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is 49.30x while PepsiCo's PE ratio is 19.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Constellation Brands is 3.34x versus 2.03x for PepsiCo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    STZ
    Constellation Brands
    3.34x 49.30x $2.2B -$375.3M
    PEP
    PepsiCo
    2.03x 19.47x $27.8B $1.5B
  • Which has Higher Returns STZ or SAM?

    Boston Beer has a net margin of -17.34% compared to Constellation Brands's net margin of -9.63%. Constellation Brands's return on equity of -0.93% beat Boston Beer's return on equity of 5.86%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    STZ
    Constellation Brands
    51.51% -$2.09 $18.6B
    SAM
    Boston Beer
    39.94% -$3.38 $916.2M
  • What do Analysts Say About STZ or SAM?

    Constellation Brands has a consensus price target of $216.09, signalling upside risk potential of 15.25%. On the other hand Boston Beer has an analysts' consensus of $264.94 which suggests that it could grow by 8.86%. Given that Constellation Brands has higher upside potential than Boston Beer, analysts believe Constellation Brands is more attractive than Boston Beer.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    STZ
    Constellation Brands
    8 11 0
    SAM
    Boston Beer
    1 11 1
  • Is STZ or SAM More Risky?

    Constellation Brands has a beta of 0.796, which suggesting that the stock is 20.376% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Boston Beer has a beta of 1.259, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.865%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock STZ or SAM?

    Constellation Brands has a quarterly dividend of $1.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.16%. Boston Beer offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Constellation Brands pays -899.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Boston Beer pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios STZ or SAM?

    Constellation Brands quarterly revenues are $2.2B, which are larger than Boston Beer quarterly revenues of $402.3M. Constellation Brands's net income of -$375.3M is lower than Boston Beer's net income of -$38.8M. Notably, Constellation Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is 49.30x while Boston Beer's PE ratio is 49.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Constellation Brands is 3.34x versus 1.42x for Boston Beer. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    STZ
    Constellation Brands
    3.34x 49.30x $2.2B -$375.3M
    SAM
    Boston Beer
    1.42x 49.37x $402.3M -$38.8M
  • Which has Higher Returns STZ or TAP?

    Molson Coors Beverage has a net margin of -17.34% compared to Constellation Brands's net margin of 10.52%. Constellation Brands's return on equity of -0.93% beat Molson Coors Beverage's return on equity of 8.35%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    STZ
    Constellation Brands
    51.51% -$2.09 $18.6B
    TAP
    Molson Coors Beverage
    37.93% $1.39 $19.6B
  • What do Analysts Say About STZ or TAP?

    Constellation Brands has a consensus price target of $216.09, signalling upside risk potential of 15.25%. On the other hand Molson Coors Beverage has an analysts' consensus of $66.71 which suggests that it could grow by 14.33%. Given that Constellation Brands has higher upside potential than Molson Coors Beverage, analysts believe Constellation Brands is more attractive than Molson Coors Beverage.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    STZ
    Constellation Brands
    8 11 0
    TAP
    Molson Coors Beverage
    4 15 1
  • Is STZ or TAP More Risky?

    Constellation Brands has a beta of 0.796, which suggesting that the stock is 20.376% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Molson Coors Beverage has a beta of 0.691, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.944%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock STZ or TAP?

    Constellation Brands has a quarterly dividend of $1.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.16%. Molson Coors Beverage offers a yield of 3.07% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. Constellation Brands pays -899.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Molson Coors Beverage pays out 32.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Molson Coors Beverage's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios STZ or TAP?

    Constellation Brands quarterly revenues are $2.2B, which are smaller than Molson Coors Beverage quarterly revenues of $2.7B. Constellation Brands's net income of -$375.3M is lower than Molson Coors Beverage's net income of $287.8M. Notably, Constellation Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is 49.30x while Molson Coors Beverage's PE ratio is 10.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Constellation Brands is 3.34x versus 1.05x for Molson Coors Beverage. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    STZ
    Constellation Brands
    3.34x 49.30x $2.2B -$375.3M
    TAP
    Molson Coors Beverage
    1.05x 10.91x $2.7B $287.8M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Why Did Bill Ackman Buy Uber Stock?
Why Did Bill Ackman Buy Uber Stock?

In February, Pershing Square manager Bill Ackman revealed that his…

Should You Buy Alibaba Stock Despite the Risks?
Should You Buy Alibaba Stock Despite the Risks?

Markets rebounded slightly after U.S. President Donald Trump announced a…

Why Is Intel Struggling Against AMD?
Why Is Intel Struggling Against AMD?

Due to its disappointing reports, so-so management, and lack of…

Stock Ideas

Buy
59
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.1T
P/E Ratio: 34x

Buy
54
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $2.9T
P/E Ratio: 33x

Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $2.6T
P/E Ratio: 36x

Alerts

Sell
48
FI alert for Apr 25

Fiserv [FI] is down 18.57% over the past day.

Buy
66
FARO alert for Apr 25

Faro Technologies [FARO] is up 17.99% over the past day.

Buy
55
PI alert for Apr 25

Impinj [PI] is up 16.61% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock