SYY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

The Chefs' Warehouse has a net margin of 2.39% compared to Sysco's net margin of 1.51%. Sysco's return on equity of 89.41% beat The Chefs' Warehouse's return on equity of 10.43%.

Sysco has a consensus price target of $85.01, signalling upside risk potential of 13.58%. On the other hand The Chefs' Warehouse has an analysts' consensus of $55.38 which suggests that it could grow by 10.77%. Given that Sysco has higher upside potential than The Chefs' Warehouse, analysts believe Sysco is more attractive than The Chefs' Warehouse.

Sysco has a beta of 1.186, which suggesting that the stock is 18.575% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Chefs' Warehouse has a beta of 2.291, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 129.105%.

Sysco has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.71%. The Chefs' Warehouse offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sysco pays 51.56% of its earnings as a dividend. The Chefs' Warehouse pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sysco's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sysco quarterly revenues are $20.5B, which are larger than The Chefs' Warehouse quarterly revenues of $931.5M. Sysco's net income of $490M is higher than The Chefs' Warehouse's net income of $14.1M. Notably, Sysco's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.24x while The Chefs' Warehouse's PE ratio is 43.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sysco is 0.47x versus 0.66x for The Chefs' Warehouse. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Performance Food Group has a net margin of 2.39% compared to Sysco's net margin of 0.7%. Sysco's return on equity of 89.41% beat Performance Food Group's return on equity of 10.59%.

Sysco has a consensus price target of $85.01, signalling upside risk potential of 13.58%. On the other hand Performance Food Group has an analysts' consensus of $98.65 which suggests that it could grow by 15%. Given that Performance Food Group has higher upside potential than Sysco, analysts believe Performance Food Group is more attractive than Sysco.

Sysco has a beta of 1.186, which suggesting that the stock is 18.575% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Performance Food Group has a beta of 1.433, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.281%.

Sysco has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.71%. Performance Food Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sysco pays 51.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Performance Food Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sysco's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sysco quarterly revenues are $20.5B, which are larger than Performance Food Group quarterly revenues of $15.4B. Sysco's net income of $490M is higher than Performance Food Group's net income of $108M. Notably, Sysco's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.24x while Performance Food Group's PE ratio is 31.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sysco is 0.47x versus 0.23x for Performance Food Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

United Natural Foods has a net margin of 2.39% compared to Sysco's net margin of -0.27%. Sysco's return on equity of 89.41% beat United Natural Foods's return on equity of -5.64%.

Sysco has a consensus price target of $85.01, signalling upside risk potential of 13.58%. On the other hand United Natural Foods has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 0.09%. Given that Sysco has higher upside potential than United Natural Foods, analysts believe Sysco is more attractive than United Natural Foods.

Sysco has a beta of 1.186, which suggesting that the stock is 18.575% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison United Natural Foods has a beta of 0.633, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.747%.

Sysco has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.71%. United Natural Foods offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sysco pays 51.56% of its earnings as a dividend. United Natural Foods pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sysco's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sysco quarterly revenues are $20.5B, which are larger than United Natural Foods quarterly revenues of $7.9B. Sysco's net income of $490M is higher than United Natural Foods's net income of -$21M. Notably, Sysco's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.24x while United Natural Foods's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sysco is 0.47x versus 0.05x for United Natural Foods. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

US Foods Holding has a net margin of 2.39% compared to Sysco's net margin of 1.52%. Sysco's return on equity of 89.41% beat US Foods Holding's return on equity of 12.04%.

Sysco has a consensus price target of $85.01, signalling upside risk potential of 13.58%. On the other hand US Foods Holding has an analysts' consensus of $76.95 which suggests that it could grow by 12.8%. Given that Sysco has higher upside potential than US Foods Holding, analysts believe Sysco is more attractive than US Foods Holding.

Sysco has a beta of 1.186, which suggesting that the stock is 18.575% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison US Foods Holding has a beta of 1.673, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 67.267%.

Sysco has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.71%. US Foods Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sysco pays 51.56% of its earnings as a dividend. US Foods Holding pays out 1.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sysco quarterly revenues are $20.5B, which are larger than US Foods Holding quarterly revenues of $9.7B. Sysco's net income of $490M is higher than US Foods Holding's net income of $148M. Notably, Sysco's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.24x while US Foods Holding's PE ratio is 29.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sysco is 0.47x versus 0.45x for US Foods Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.