TXT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

General Dynamics has a net margin of 3.9% compared to Textron's net margin of 8.61%. Textron's return on equity of 11.8% beat General Dynamics's return on equity of 17.23%.

Textron has a consensus price target of $89.39, signalling upside risk potential of 34.61%. On the other hand General Dynamics has an analysts' consensus of $288.64 which suggests that it could grow by 7.05%. Given that Textron has higher upside potential than General Dynamics, analysts believe Textron is more attractive than General Dynamics.

Textron has a beta of 1.063, which suggesting that the stock is 6.278% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison General Dynamics has a beta of 0.429, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.074%.

Textron has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.12%. General Dynamics offers a yield of 2.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.42 per share. Textron pays 1.46% of its earnings as a dividend. General Dynamics pays out 40.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Textron quarterly revenues are $3.6B, which are smaller than General Dynamics quarterly revenues of $13.3B. Textron's net income of $141M is lower than General Dynamics's net income of $1.1B. Notably, Textron's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.48x while General Dynamics's PE ratio is 19.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Textron is 0.93x versus 1.58x for General Dynamics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

GE Aerospace has a net margin of 3.9% compared to Textron's net margin of 17.57%. Textron's return on equity of 11.8% beat GE Aerospace's return on equity of 27.96%.

Textron has a consensus price target of $89.39, signalling upside risk potential of 34.61%. On the other hand GE Aerospace has an analysts' consensus of $227.46 which suggests that it could grow by 21.23%. Given that Textron has higher upside potential than GE Aerospace, analysts believe Textron is more attractive than GE Aerospace.

Textron has a beta of 1.063, which suggesting that the stock is 6.278% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GE Aerospace has a beta of 1.047, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.7%.

Textron has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.12%. GE Aerospace offers a yield of 0.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share. Textron pays 1.46% of its earnings as a dividend. GE Aerospace pays out 15.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Textron quarterly revenues are $3.6B, which are smaller than GE Aerospace quarterly revenues of $10.8B. Textron's net income of $141M is lower than GE Aerospace's net income of $1.9B. Notably, Textron's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.48x while GE Aerospace's PE ratio is 31.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Textron is 0.93x versus 4.49x for GE Aerospace. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lockheed Martin has a net margin of 3.9% compared to Textron's net margin of 2.83%. Textron's return on equity of 11.8% beat Lockheed Martin's return on equity of 80.38%.

Textron has a consensus price target of $89.39, signalling upside risk potential of 34.61%. On the other hand Lockheed Martin has an analysts' consensus of $523.76 which suggests that it could grow by 15.17%. Given that Textron has higher upside potential than Lockheed Martin, analysts believe Textron is more attractive than Lockheed Martin.

Textron has a beta of 1.063, which suggesting that the stock is 6.278% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lockheed Martin has a beta of 0.389, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.059%.

Textron has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.12%. Lockheed Martin offers a yield of 2.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $3.30 per share. Textron pays 1.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Lockheed Martin pays out 57.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Textron quarterly revenues are $3.6B, which are smaller than Lockheed Martin quarterly revenues of $18.6B. Textron's net income of $141M is lower than Lockheed Martin's net income of $527M. Notably, Textron's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.48x while Lockheed Martin's PE ratio is 20.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Textron is 0.93x versus 1.53x for Lockheed Martin. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RTX has a net margin of 3.9% compared to Textron's net margin of 6.85%. Textron's return on equity of 11.8% beat RTX's return on equity of 7.72%.

Textron has a consensus price target of $89.39, signalling upside risk potential of 34.61%. On the other hand RTX has an analysts' consensus of $143.33 which suggests that it could grow by 10.06%. Given that Textron has higher upside potential than RTX, analysts believe Textron is more attractive than RTX.

Textron has a beta of 1.063, which suggesting that the stock is 6.278% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RTX has a beta of 0.604, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.573%.

Textron has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.12%. RTX offers a yield of 1.94% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.63 per share. Textron pays 1.46% of its earnings as a dividend. RTX pays out 67.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Textron quarterly revenues are $3.6B, which are smaller than RTX quarterly revenues of $21.6B. Textron's net income of $141M is lower than RTX's net income of $1.5B. Notably, Textron's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.48x while RTX's PE ratio is 36.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Textron is 0.93x versus 2.17x for RTX. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.