BAM.TO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

ECN Capital has a net margin of 64.72% compared to Brookfield Asset Management's net margin of -3.03%. Brookfield Asset Management's return on equity of 19.19% beat ECN Capital's return on equity of 3.72%.

Brookfield Asset Management has a consensus price target of $74.72, signalling upside risk potential of 13.72%. On the other hand ECN Capital has an analysts' consensus of $3.83 which suggests that it could grow by 49.03%. Given that ECN Capital has higher upside potential than Brookfield Asset Management, analysts believe ECN Capital is more attractive than Brookfield Asset Management.

Brookfield Asset Management has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ECN Capital has a beta of 1.389, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.85%.

Brookfield Asset Management has a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.34%. ECN Capital offers a yield of 1.95% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Brookfield Asset Management pays 116.45% of its earnings as a dividend. ECN Capital pays out 207.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Brookfield Asset Management quarterly revenues are $166.9M, which are larger than ECN Capital quarterly revenues of $69.6M. Brookfield Asset Management's net income of $258.8M is higher than ECN Capital's net income of -$2.1M. Notably, Brookfield Asset Management's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.74x while ECN Capital's PE ratio is 67.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brookfield Asset Management is -- versus 2.57x for ECN Capital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Fairfax Financial Holdings has a net margin of 64.72% compared to Brookfield Asset Management's net margin of 14.97%. Brookfield Asset Management's return on equity of 19.19% beat Fairfax Financial Holdings's return on equity of 13.85%.

Brookfield Asset Management has a consensus price target of $74.72, signalling upside risk potential of 13.72%. On the other hand Fairfax Financial Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $2,284.56 which suggests that it could grow by 14.8%. Given that Fairfax Financial Holdings has higher upside potential than Brookfield Asset Management, analysts believe Fairfax Financial Holdings is more attractive than Brookfield Asset Management.

Brookfield Asset Management has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fairfax Financial Holdings has a beta of 0.614, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.573%.

Brookfield Asset Management has a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.34%. Fairfax Financial Holdings offers a yield of 1.08% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $21.49 per share. Brookfield Asset Management pays 116.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Fairfax Financial Holdings pays out 10.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Fairfax Financial Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Brookfield Asset Management's is not.

Brookfield Asset Management quarterly revenues are $166.9M, which are smaller than Fairfax Financial Holdings quarterly revenues of $10.7B. Brookfield Asset Management's net income of $258.8M is lower than Fairfax Financial Holdings's net income of $1.6B. Notably, Brookfield Asset Management's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.74x while Fairfax Financial Holdings's PE ratio is 9.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brookfield Asset Management is -- versus 1.20x for Fairfax Financial Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Fiera Capital has a net margin of 64.72% compared to Brookfield Asset Management's net margin of -0.11%. Brookfield Asset Management's return on equity of 19.19% beat Fiera Capital's return on equity of 8.16%.

Brookfield Asset Management has a consensus price target of $74.72, signalling upside risk potential of 13.72%. On the other hand Fiera Capital has an analysts' consensus of $7.46 which suggests that it could grow by 23.48%. Given that Fiera Capital has higher upside potential than Brookfield Asset Management, analysts believe Fiera Capital is more attractive than Brookfield Asset Management.

Brookfield Asset Management has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fiera Capital has a beta of 1.344, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.396%.

Brookfield Asset Management has a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.34%. Fiera Capital offers a yield of 14.27% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. Brookfield Asset Management pays 116.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Fiera Capital pays out 364.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Brookfield Asset Management quarterly revenues are $166.9M, which are smaller than Fiera Capital quarterly revenues of $182.3M. Brookfield Asset Management's net income of $258.8M is higher than Fiera Capital's net income of -$192K. Notably, Brookfield Asset Management's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.74x while Fiera Capital's PE ratio is 28.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brookfield Asset Management is -- versus 1.00x for Fiera Capital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Power Corporation of Canada has a net margin of 64.72% compared to Brookfield Asset Management's net margin of 9.05%. Brookfield Asset Management's return on equity of 19.19% beat Power Corporation of Canada's return on equity of 6.49%.

Brookfield Asset Management has a consensus price target of $74.72, signalling upside risk potential of 13.72%. On the other hand Power Corporation of Canada has an analysts' consensus of $53.81 which suggests that it could grow by 13.34%. Given that Brookfield Asset Management has higher upside potential than Power Corporation of Canada, analysts believe Brookfield Asset Management is more attractive than Power Corporation of Canada.

Brookfield Asset Management has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Power Corporation of Canada has a beta of 0.897, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.325%.

Brookfield Asset Management has a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.34%. Power Corporation of Canada offers a yield of 4.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.61 per share. Brookfield Asset Management pays 116.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Power Corporation of Canada pays out 53.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Power Corporation of Canada's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Brookfield Asset Management's is not.

Brookfield Asset Management quarterly revenues are $166.9M, which are smaller than Power Corporation of Canada quarterly revenues of $9.9B. Brookfield Asset Management's net income of $258.8M is lower than Power Corporation of Canada's net income of $897M. Notably, Brookfield Asset Management's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.74x while Power Corporation of Canada's PE ratio is 11.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brookfield Asset Management is -- versus 0.74x for Power Corporation of Canada. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.