ACDC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Flotek Industries has a net margin of -2.92% compared to ProFrac Holding's net margin of 8.73%. ProFrac Holding's return on equity of -20.25% beat Flotek Industries's return on equity of 9.81%.

ProFrac Holding has a consensus price target of $7.10, signalling upside risk potential of 78.62%. On the other hand Flotek Industries has an analysts' consensus of $11.00 which suggests that it could fall by -0.99%. Given that ProFrac Holding has higher upside potential than Flotek Industries, analysts believe ProFrac Holding is more attractive than Flotek Industries.

ProFrac Holding has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Flotek Industries has a beta of 1.003, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.284%.

ProFrac Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Flotek Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ProFrac Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Flotek Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

ProFrac Holding quarterly revenues are $600.3M, which are larger than Flotek Industries quarterly revenues of $50.8M. ProFrac Holding's net income of -$17.5M is lower than Flotek Industries's net income of $4.4M. Notably, ProFrac Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.77x while Flotek Industries's PE ratio is 33.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProFrac Holding is 0.29x versus 1.83x for Flotek Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Halliburton has a net margin of -2.92% compared to ProFrac Holding's net margin of 3.77%. ProFrac Holding's return on equity of -20.25% beat Halliburton's return on equity of 20.56%.

ProFrac Holding has a consensus price target of $7.10, signalling upside risk potential of 78.62%. On the other hand Halliburton has an analysts' consensus of $29.34 which suggests that it could grow by 44.95%. Given that ProFrac Holding has higher upside potential than Halliburton, analysts believe ProFrac Holding is more attractive than Halliburton.

ProFrac Holding has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Halliburton has a beta of 1.186, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.638%.

ProFrac Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Halliburton offers a yield of 3.36% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. ProFrac Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Halliburton pays out 23.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Halliburton's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ProFrac Holding quarterly revenues are $600.3M, which are smaller than Halliburton quarterly revenues of $5.4B. ProFrac Holding's net income of -$17.5M is lower than Halliburton's net income of $204M. Notably, ProFrac Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.77x while Halliburton's PE ratio is 8.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProFrac Holding is 0.29x versus 0.79x for Halliburton. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

KLX Energy Services Holdings has a net margin of -2.92% compared to ProFrac Holding's net margin of -8.82%. ProFrac Holding's return on equity of -20.25% beat KLX Energy Services Holdings's return on equity of -460.87%.

ProFrac Holding has a consensus price target of $7.10, signalling upside risk potential of 78.62%. On the other hand KLX Energy Services Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $8.00 which suggests that it could grow by 243.35%. Given that KLX Energy Services Holdings has higher upside potential than ProFrac Holding, analysts believe KLX Energy Services Holdings is more attractive than ProFrac Holding.

ProFrac Holding has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KLX Energy Services Holdings has a beta of 1.086, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.617%.

ProFrac Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. KLX Energy Services Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ProFrac Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. KLX Energy Services Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

ProFrac Holding quarterly revenues are $600.3M, which are larger than KLX Energy Services Holdings quarterly revenues of $165.5M. ProFrac Holding's net income of -$17.5M is lower than KLX Energy Services Holdings's net income of -$14.6M. Notably, ProFrac Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.77x while KLX Energy Services Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProFrac Holding is 0.29x versus 0.05x for KLX Energy Services Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NextDecade has a net margin of -2.92% compared to ProFrac Holding's net margin of --. ProFrac Holding's return on equity of -20.25% beat NextDecade's return on equity of --.

ProFrac Holding has a consensus price target of $7.10, signalling upside risk potential of 78.62%. On the other hand NextDecade has an analysts' consensus of $11.33 which suggests that it could grow by 51.72%. Given that ProFrac Holding has higher upside potential than NextDecade, analysts believe ProFrac Holding is more attractive than NextDecade.

ProFrac Holding has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NextDecade has a beta of 1.053, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.287%.

ProFrac Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NextDecade offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ProFrac Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NextDecade pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

ProFrac Holding quarterly revenues are $600.3M, which are larger than NextDecade quarterly revenues of --. ProFrac Holding's net income of -$17.5M is higher than NextDecade's net income of -$88.8M. Notably, ProFrac Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.77x while NextDecade's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProFrac Holding is 0.29x versus -- for NextDecade. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.