AIOT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Data Storage has a net margin of -13.48% compared to PowerFleet's net margin of 2.11%. PowerFleet's return on equity of -13.42% beat Data Storage's return on equity of 0.8%.

PowerFleet has a consensus price target of $11.17, signalling upside risk potential of 122.44%. On the other hand Data Storage has an analysts' consensus of $9.00 which suggests that it could grow by 154.24%. Given that Data Storage has higher upside potential than PowerFleet, analysts believe Data Storage is more attractive than PowerFleet.

PowerFleet has a beta of 1.398, which suggesting that the stock is 39.78% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Data Storage has a beta of 1.180, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.975%.

PowerFleet has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Data Storage offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. PowerFleet pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Data Storage pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

PowerFleet quarterly revenues are $106.4M, which are larger than Data Storage quarterly revenues of $5.8M. PowerFleet's net income of -$14.3M is lower than Data Storage's net income of $122.4K. Notably, PowerFleet's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Data Storage's PE ratio is 50.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PowerFleet is 1.64x versus 1.02x for Data Storage. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Intellinetics has a net margin of -13.48% compared to PowerFleet's net margin of -1.26%. PowerFleet's return on equity of -13.42% beat Intellinetics's return on equity of -5.34%.

PowerFleet has a consensus price target of $11.17, signalling upside risk potential of 122.44%. On the other hand Intellinetics has an analysts' consensus of $17.50 which suggests that it could grow by 34.2%. Given that PowerFleet has higher upside potential than Intellinetics, analysts believe PowerFleet is more attractive than Intellinetics.

PowerFleet has a beta of 1.398, which suggesting that the stock is 39.78% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intellinetics has a beta of 0.548, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.204%.

PowerFleet has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Intellinetics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. PowerFleet pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Intellinetics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

PowerFleet quarterly revenues are $106.4M, which are larger than Intellinetics quarterly revenues of $4.3M. PowerFleet's net income of -$14.3M is lower than Intellinetics's net income of -$53.7K. Notably, PowerFleet's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Intellinetics's PE ratio is 248.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PowerFleet is 1.64x versus 3.13x for Intellinetics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Signing Day Sports has a net margin of -13.48% compared to PowerFleet's net margin of -2893.73%. PowerFleet's return on equity of -13.42% beat Signing Day Sports's return on equity of --.

PowerFleet has a consensus price target of $11.17, signalling upside risk potential of 122.44%. On the other hand Signing Day Sports has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that PowerFleet has higher upside potential than Signing Day Sports, analysts believe PowerFleet is more attractive than Signing Day Sports.

PowerFleet has a beta of 1.398, which suggesting that the stock is 39.78% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Signing Day Sports has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

PowerFleet has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Signing Day Sports offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. PowerFleet pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Signing Day Sports pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

PowerFleet quarterly revenues are $106.4M, which are larger than Signing Day Sports quarterly revenues of $55.4K. PowerFleet's net income of -$14.3M is lower than Signing Day Sports's net income of -$1.6M. Notably, PowerFleet's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Signing Day Sports's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PowerFleet is 1.64x versus 0.45x for Signing Day Sports. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

WidePoint has a net margin of -13.48% compared to PowerFleet's net margin of -1.23%. PowerFleet's return on equity of -13.42% beat WidePoint's return on equity of -20.12%.

PowerFleet has a consensus price target of $11.17, signalling upside risk potential of 122.44%. On the other hand WidePoint has an analysts' consensus of $6.50 which suggests that it could grow by 30.26%. Given that PowerFleet has higher upside potential than WidePoint, analysts believe PowerFleet is more attractive than WidePoint.

PowerFleet has a beta of 1.398, which suggesting that the stock is 39.78% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WidePoint has a beta of 1.805, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 80.475%.

PowerFleet has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. WidePoint offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. PowerFleet pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. WidePoint pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

PowerFleet quarterly revenues are $106.4M, which are larger than WidePoint quarterly revenues of $34.6M. PowerFleet's net income of -$14.3M is lower than WidePoint's net income of -$425.2K. Notably, PowerFleet's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while WidePoint's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PowerFleet is 1.64x versus 0.33x for WidePoint. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.