ALAB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Lattice Semiconductor has a net margin of 17.52% compared to Astera Labs's net margin of 14.06%. Astera Labs's return on equity of -12.23% beat Lattice Semiconductor's return on equity of 8.76%.

Astera Labs has a consensus price target of $122.16, signalling upside risk potential of 119.4%. On the other hand Lattice Semiconductor has an analysts' consensus of $68.87 which suggests that it could grow by 59.87%. Given that Astera Labs has higher upside potential than Lattice Semiconductor, analysts believe Astera Labs is more attractive than Lattice Semiconductor.

Astera Labs has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lattice Semiconductor has a beta of 1.636, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.603%.

Astera Labs has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lattice Semiconductor offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Astera Labs pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lattice Semiconductor pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Astera Labs quarterly revenues are $141.1M, which are larger than Lattice Semiconductor quarterly revenues of $117.4M. Astera Labs's net income of $24.7M is higher than Lattice Semiconductor's net income of $16.5M. Notably, Astera Labs's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Lattice Semiconductor's PE ratio is 97.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Astera Labs is 18.43x versus 11.70x for Lattice Semiconductor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Monolithic Power Systems has a net margin of 17.52% compared to Astera Labs's net margin of 23.29%. Astera Labs's return on equity of -12.23% beat Monolithic Power Systems's return on equity of 75.35%.

Astera Labs has a consensus price target of $122.16, signalling upside risk potential of 119.4%. On the other hand Monolithic Power Systems has an analysts' consensus of $817.74 which suggests that it could grow by 63.98%. Given that Astera Labs has higher upside potential than Monolithic Power Systems, analysts believe Astera Labs is more attractive than Monolithic Power Systems.

Astera Labs has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Monolithic Power Systems has a beta of 1.206, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.602%.

Astera Labs has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Monolithic Power Systems offers a yield of 1.07% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.56 per share. Astera Labs pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Monolithic Power Systems pays out 13.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Monolithic Power Systems's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Astera Labs quarterly revenues are $141.1M, which are smaller than Monolithic Power Systems quarterly revenues of $621.7M. Astera Labs's net income of $24.7M is lower than Monolithic Power Systems's net income of $1.4B. Notably, Astera Labs's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Monolithic Power Systems's PE ratio is 13.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Astera Labs is 18.43x versus 11.03x for Monolithic Power Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marvell Technology has a net margin of 17.52% compared to Astera Labs's net margin of 11.02%. Astera Labs's return on equity of -12.23% beat Marvell Technology's return on equity of -6.29%.

Astera Labs has a consensus price target of $122.16, signalling upside risk potential of 119.4%. On the other hand Marvell Technology has an analysts' consensus of $112.79 which suggests that it could grow by 102.72%. Given that Astera Labs has higher upside potential than Marvell Technology, analysts believe Astera Labs is more attractive than Marvell Technology.

Astera Labs has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marvell Technology has a beta of 1.781, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 78.133%.

Astera Labs has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Marvell Technology offers a yield of 0.43% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Astera Labs pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Marvell Technology pays out -23.45% of its earnings as a dividend.

Astera Labs quarterly revenues are $141.1M, which are smaller than Marvell Technology quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Astera Labs's net income of $24.7M is lower than Marvell Technology's net income of $200.2M. Notably, Astera Labs's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Marvell Technology's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Astera Labs is 18.43x versus 8.35x for Marvell Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NVIDIA has a net margin of 17.52% compared to Astera Labs's net margin of 56.17%. Astera Labs's return on equity of -12.23% beat NVIDIA's return on equity of 123.32%.

Astera Labs has a consensus price target of $122.16, signalling upside risk potential of 119.4%. On the other hand NVIDIA has an analysts' consensus of $170.01 which suggests that it could grow by 67.01%. Given that Astera Labs has higher upside potential than NVIDIA, analysts believe Astera Labs is more attractive than NVIDIA.

Astera Labs has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NVIDIA has a beta of 1.959, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 95.871%.

Astera Labs has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NVIDIA offers a yield of 0.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Astera Labs pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA pays out 1.14% of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Astera Labs quarterly revenues are $141.1M, which are smaller than NVIDIA quarterly revenues of $39.3B. Astera Labs's net income of $24.7M is lower than NVIDIA's net income of $22.1B. Notably, Astera Labs's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NVIDIA's PE ratio is 34.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Astera Labs is 18.43x versus 19.35x for NVIDIA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.