Financhill
Sell
44

AUDC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$8.55
Seasonality move :
1.95%
Day range:
$8.34 - $8.69
52-week range:
$7.70 - $12.72
Dividend yield:
4.27%
P/E ratio:
15.07x
P/S ratio:
1.06x
P/B ratio:
1.34x
Volume:
114.8K
Avg. volume:
106.9K
1-year change:
-14.57%
Market cap:
$248.8M
Revenue:
$242.2M
EPS (TTM):
$0.56

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
AUDC
AudioCodes
$60.5M $0.18 1.82% 50% $11.75
FORTY
Formula Systems (1985)
-- -- -- -- --
MGIC
Magic Software Enterprises
$143.8M $0.27 9.12% 47.78% $16.00
MNDO
MIND C.T.I.
-- -- -- -- --
SATX
SatixFy Communications
$3.5M -$0.12 83.63% -14.29% $2.50
SYNX
Silynxcom
-- -- -- -- --
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
AUDC
AudioCodes
$8.44 $11.75 $248.8M 15.07x $0.18 4.27% 1.06x
FORTY
Formula Systems (1985)
$91.41 -- $1.4B 17.96x $0.94 1.71% 0.52x
MGIC
Magic Software Enterprises
$14.41 $16.00 $707.5M 19.21x $0.33 5.32% 1.28x
MNDO
MIND C.T.I.
$1.45 -- $29.5M 6.59x $0.22 15.17% 1.39x
SATX
SatixFy Communications
$2.04 $2.50 $177.2M -- $0.00 0% 8.28x
SYNX
Silynxcom
$1.86 -- $9.4M -- $0.00 0% --
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
AUDC
AudioCodes
-- 0.384 -- 1.66x
FORTY
Formula Systems (1985)
41.37% 0.080 23.11% 1.28x
MGIC
Magic Software Enterprises
17.62% -0.031 11.53% 1.62x
MNDO
MIND C.T.I.
-- 0.437 -- 5.65x
SATX
SatixFy Communications
-305.75% -2.670 115.09% 0.28x
SYNX
Silynxcom
-- -0.446 -- --
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
AUDC
AudioCodes
$39.1M $3.6M 9.21% 9.21% 6.04% $12M
FORTY
Formula Systems (1985)
$180.5M $71.9M 4.33% 5.95% 10.39% --
MGIC
Magic Software Enterprises
$42M $16.7M 10.06% 12.43% 11.71% $24.6M
MNDO
MIND C.T.I.
$2.9M $1.3M 20.12% 20.12% 25.39% $305K
SATX
SatixFy Communications
$1.7M -$9.4M -- -- -382.33% --
SYNX
Silynxcom
-- -- -- -- -- --

AudioCodes vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns AUDC or FORTY?

    Formula Systems (1985) has a net margin of 6.65% compared to AudioCodes's net margin of 2.9%. AudioCodes's return on equity of 9.21% beat Formula Systems (1985)'s return on equity of 5.95%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    AUDC
    AudioCodes
    64.82% $0.13 $185.9M
    FORTY
    Formula Systems (1985)
    26.1% $1.28 $1.9B
  • What do Analysts Say About AUDC or FORTY?

    AudioCodes has a consensus price target of $11.75, signalling upside risk potential of 39.22%. On the other hand Formula Systems (1985) has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that AudioCodes has higher upside potential than Formula Systems (1985), analysts believe AudioCodes is more attractive than Formula Systems (1985).

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    AUDC
    AudioCodes
    0 1 0
    FORTY
    Formula Systems (1985)
    0 0 0
  • Is AUDC or FORTY More Risky?

    AudioCodes has a beta of 0.939, which suggesting that the stock is 6.061% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Formula Systems (1985) has a beta of 0.876, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.37%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock AUDC or FORTY?

    AudioCodes has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.27%. Formula Systems (1985) offers a yield of 1.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.94 per share. AudioCodes pays 71.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Formula Systems (1985) pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. AudioCodes's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios AUDC or FORTY?

    AudioCodes quarterly revenues are $60.4M, which are smaller than Formula Systems (1985) quarterly revenues of $691.5M. AudioCodes's net income of $4M is lower than Formula Systems (1985)'s net income of $20.1M. Notably, AudioCodes's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.07x while Formula Systems (1985)'s PE ratio is 17.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AudioCodes is 1.06x versus 0.52x for Formula Systems (1985). Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    AUDC
    AudioCodes
    1.06x 15.07x $60.4M $4M
    FORTY
    Formula Systems (1985)
    0.52x 17.96x $691.5M $20.1M
  • Which has Higher Returns AUDC or MGIC?

    Magic Software Enterprises has a net margin of 6.65% compared to AudioCodes's net margin of 7.45%. AudioCodes's return on equity of 9.21% beat Magic Software Enterprises's return on equity of 12.43%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    AUDC
    AudioCodes
    64.82% $0.13 $185.9M
    MGIC
    Magic Software Enterprises
    29.43% $0.22 $360.4M
  • What do Analysts Say About AUDC or MGIC?

    AudioCodes has a consensus price target of $11.75, signalling upside risk potential of 39.22%. On the other hand Magic Software Enterprises has an analysts' consensus of $16.00 which suggests that it could grow by 11.03%. Given that AudioCodes has higher upside potential than Magic Software Enterprises, analysts believe AudioCodes is more attractive than Magic Software Enterprises.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    AUDC
    AudioCodes
    0 1 0
    MGIC
    Magic Software Enterprises
    0 1 0
  • Is AUDC or MGIC More Risky?

    AudioCodes has a beta of 0.939, which suggesting that the stock is 6.061% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Magic Software Enterprises has a beta of 0.987, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.347%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock AUDC or MGIC?

    AudioCodes has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.27%. Magic Software Enterprises offers a yield of 5.32% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share. AudioCodes pays 71.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Magic Software Enterprises pays out 27.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios AUDC or MGIC?

    AudioCodes quarterly revenues are $60.4M, which are smaller than Magic Software Enterprises quarterly revenues of $142.6M. AudioCodes's net income of $4M is lower than Magic Software Enterprises's net income of $10.6M. Notably, AudioCodes's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.07x while Magic Software Enterprises's PE ratio is 19.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AudioCodes is 1.06x versus 1.28x for Magic Software Enterprises. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    AUDC
    AudioCodes
    1.06x 15.07x $60.4M $4M
    MGIC
    Magic Software Enterprises
    1.28x 19.21x $142.6M $10.6M
  • Which has Higher Returns AUDC or MNDO?

    MIND C.T.I. has a net margin of 6.65% compared to AudioCodes's net margin of 23.81%. AudioCodes's return on equity of 9.21% beat MIND C.T.I.'s return on equity of 20.12%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    AUDC
    AudioCodes
    64.82% $0.13 $185.9M
    MNDO
    MIND C.T.I.
    55.59% $0.06 $24.3M
  • What do Analysts Say About AUDC or MNDO?

    AudioCodes has a consensus price target of $11.75, signalling upside risk potential of 39.22%. On the other hand MIND C.T.I. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that AudioCodes has higher upside potential than MIND C.T.I., analysts believe AudioCodes is more attractive than MIND C.T.I..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    AUDC
    AudioCodes
    0 1 0
    MNDO
    MIND C.T.I.
    0 0 0
  • Is AUDC or MNDO More Risky?

    AudioCodes has a beta of 0.939, which suggesting that the stock is 6.061% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MIND C.T.I. has a beta of 0.798, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.187%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock AUDC or MNDO?

    AudioCodes has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.27%. MIND C.T.I. offers a yield of 15.17% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. AudioCodes pays 71.17% of its earnings as a dividend. MIND C.T.I. pays out 105.14% of its earnings as a dividend. AudioCodes's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but MIND C.T.I.'s is not.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios AUDC or MNDO?

    AudioCodes quarterly revenues are $60.4M, which are larger than MIND C.T.I. quarterly revenues of $5.2M. AudioCodes's net income of $4M is higher than MIND C.T.I.'s net income of $1.2M. Notably, AudioCodes's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.07x while MIND C.T.I.'s PE ratio is 6.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AudioCodes is 1.06x versus 1.39x for MIND C.T.I.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    AUDC
    AudioCodes
    1.06x 15.07x $60.4M $4M
    MNDO
    MIND C.T.I.
    1.39x 6.59x $5.2M $1.2M
  • Which has Higher Returns AUDC or SATX?

    SatixFy Communications has a net margin of 6.65% compared to AudioCodes's net margin of -539.62%. AudioCodes's return on equity of 9.21% beat SatixFy Communications's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    AUDC
    AudioCodes
    64.82% $0.13 $185.9M
    SATX
    SatixFy Communications
    67.59% -$0.16 -$22.6M
  • What do Analysts Say About AUDC or SATX?

    AudioCodes has a consensus price target of $11.75, signalling upside risk potential of 39.22%. On the other hand SatixFy Communications has an analysts' consensus of $2.50 which suggests that it could grow by 22.55%. Given that AudioCodes has higher upside potential than SatixFy Communications, analysts believe AudioCodes is more attractive than SatixFy Communications.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    AUDC
    AudioCodes
    0 1 0
    SATX
    SatixFy Communications
    2 0 0
  • Is AUDC or SATX More Risky?

    AudioCodes has a beta of 0.939, which suggesting that the stock is 6.061% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SatixFy Communications has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock AUDC or SATX?

    AudioCodes has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.27%. SatixFy Communications offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AudioCodes pays 71.17% of its earnings as a dividend. SatixFy Communications pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. AudioCodes's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios AUDC or SATX?

    AudioCodes quarterly revenues are $60.4M, which are larger than SatixFy Communications quarterly revenues of $2.5M. AudioCodes's net income of $4M is higher than SatixFy Communications's net income of -$13.3M. Notably, AudioCodes's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.07x while SatixFy Communications's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AudioCodes is 1.06x versus 8.28x for SatixFy Communications. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    AUDC
    AudioCodes
    1.06x 15.07x $60.4M $4M
    SATX
    SatixFy Communications
    8.28x -- $2.5M -$13.3M
  • Which has Higher Returns AUDC or SYNX?

    Silynxcom has a net margin of 6.65% compared to AudioCodes's net margin of --. AudioCodes's return on equity of 9.21% beat Silynxcom's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    AUDC
    AudioCodes
    64.82% $0.13 $185.9M
    SYNX
    Silynxcom
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About AUDC or SYNX?

    AudioCodes has a consensus price target of $11.75, signalling upside risk potential of 39.22%. On the other hand Silynxcom has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 330.11%. Given that Silynxcom has higher upside potential than AudioCodes, analysts believe Silynxcom is more attractive than AudioCodes.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    AUDC
    AudioCodes
    0 1 0
    SYNX
    Silynxcom
    0 0 0
  • Is AUDC or SYNX More Risky?

    AudioCodes has a beta of 0.939, which suggesting that the stock is 6.061% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Silynxcom has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock AUDC or SYNX?

    AudioCodes has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.27%. Silynxcom offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AudioCodes pays 71.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Silynxcom pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. AudioCodes's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios AUDC or SYNX?

    AudioCodes quarterly revenues are $60.4M, which are larger than Silynxcom quarterly revenues of --. AudioCodes's net income of $4M is higher than Silynxcom's net income of --. Notably, AudioCodes's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.07x while Silynxcom's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AudioCodes is 1.06x versus -- for Silynxcom. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    AUDC
    AudioCodes
    1.06x 15.07x $60.4M $4M
    SYNX
    Silynxcom
    -- -- -- --

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

5 Investors to Follow Other Than Warren Buffett
5 Investors to Follow Other Than Warren Buffett

There is no doubt that Warren Buffett is one of…

Is BYD a Threat To Tesla Shareholders?
Is BYD a Threat To Tesla Shareholders?

BYD (OTC:BYDDY) has rocketed to the top of China’s booming…

CVX Vs XOM Stock, Which Energy Play Is Best?
CVX Vs XOM Stock, Which Energy Play Is Best?

Chevron (NYSE:CVX) and Exxon Mobil (NYSE:XOM) are two of the…

Stock Ideas

Buy
70
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 37x

Sell
39
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $2.9T
P/E Ratio: 32x

Buy
63
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $2.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x

Alerts

Buy
99
DAVE alert for May 9

Dave [DAVE] is up 5.34% over the past day.

Buy
52
QDEL alert for May 9

QuidelOrtho [QDEL] is down 0.99% over the past day.

Buy
61
TPC alert for May 9

Tutor Perini [TPC] is up 5.93% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock