BGC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

MarketAxess Holdings has a net margin of 2.71% compared to BGC Group's net margin of 34.58%. BGC Group's return on equity of 12.78% beat MarketAxess Holdings's return on equity of 21.38%.

BGC Group has a consensus price target of $12.00, signalling upside risk potential of 25.39%. On the other hand MarketAxess Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $268.42 which suggests that it could grow by 22.23%. Given that BGC Group has higher upside potential than MarketAxess Holdings, analysts believe BGC Group is more attractive than MarketAxess Holdings.

BGC Group has a beta of 1.462, which suggesting that the stock is 46.236% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MarketAxess Holdings has a beta of 1.029, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.949%.

BGC Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.73%. MarketAxess Holdings offers a yield of 1.35% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.74 per share. BGC Group pays 47.93% of its earnings as a dividend. MarketAxess Holdings pays out 42.49% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BGC Group quarterly revenues are $544.2M, which are larger than MarketAxess Holdings quarterly revenues of $206.7M. BGC Group's net income of $14.7M is lower than MarketAxess Holdings's net income of $71.5M. Notably, BGC Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.28x while MarketAxess Holdings's PE ratio is 29.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BGC Group is 2.13x versus 10.20x for MarketAxess Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Riot Platforms has a net margin of 2.71% compared to BGC Group's net margin of -182.06%. BGC Group's return on equity of 12.78% beat Riot Platforms's return on equity of 0.56%.

BGC Group has a consensus price target of $12.00, signalling upside risk potential of 25.39%. On the other hand Riot Platforms has an analysts' consensus of $17.70 which suggests that it could grow by 47.26%. Given that Riot Platforms has higher upside potential than BGC Group, analysts believe Riot Platforms is more attractive than BGC Group.

BGC Group has a beta of 1.462, which suggesting that the stock is 46.236% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Riot Platforms has a beta of 4.216, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 321.609%.

BGC Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.73%. Riot Platforms offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BGC Group pays 47.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Riot Platforms pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. BGC Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BGC Group quarterly revenues are $544.2M, which are larger than Riot Platforms quarterly revenues of $84.8M. BGC Group's net income of $14.7M is higher than Riot Platforms's net income of -$154.4M. Notably, BGC Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.28x while Riot Platforms's PE ratio is 60.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BGC Group is 2.13x versus 9.67x for Riot Platforms. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Siebert Financial has a net margin of 2.71% compared to BGC Group's net margin of 17.53%. BGC Group's return on equity of 12.78% beat Siebert Financial's return on equity of 14.12%.

BGC Group has a consensus price target of $12.00, signalling upside risk potential of 25.39%. On the other hand Siebert Financial has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that BGC Group has higher upside potential than Siebert Financial, analysts believe BGC Group is more attractive than Siebert Financial.

BGC Group has a beta of 1.462, which suggesting that the stock is 46.236% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Siebert Financial has a beta of 0.324, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 67.631%.

BGC Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.73%. Siebert Financial offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BGC Group pays 47.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Siebert Financial pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. BGC Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BGC Group quarterly revenues are $544.2M, which are larger than Siebert Financial quarterly revenues of $21.8M. BGC Group's net income of $14.7M is higher than Siebert Financial's net income of $3.8M. Notably, BGC Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.28x while Siebert Financial's PE ratio is 12.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BGC Group is 2.13x versus 1.50x for Siebert Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

TeraWulf has a net margin of 2.71% compared to BGC Group's net margin of -84.01%. BGC Group's return on equity of 12.78% beat TeraWulf's return on equity of -19.09%.

BGC Group has a consensus price target of $12.00, signalling upside risk potential of 25.39%. On the other hand TeraWulf has an analysts' consensus of $9.83 which suggests that it could grow by 78.46%. Given that TeraWulf has higher upside potential than BGC Group, analysts believe TeraWulf is more attractive than BGC Group.

BGC Group has a beta of 1.462, which suggesting that the stock is 46.236% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TeraWulf has a beta of 2.612, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 161.2%.

BGC Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.73%. TeraWulf offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BGC Group pays 47.93% of its earnings as a dividend. TeraWulf pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. BGC Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BGC Group quarterly revenues are $544.2M, which are larger than TeraWulf quarterly revenues of $27.1M. BGC Group's net income of $14.7M is higher than TeraWulf's net income of -$22.7M. Notably, BGC Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.28x while TeraWulf's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BGC Group is 2.13x versus 13.67x for TeraWulf. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.