WULF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cleanspark has a net margin of -84.01% compared to TeraWulf's net margin of -69.65%. TeraWulf's return on equity of -19.09% beat Cleanspark's return on equity of -11.93%.

TeraWulf has a consensus price target of $9.83, signalling upside risk potential of 78.46%. On the other hand Cleanspark has an analysts' consensus of $24.17 which suggests that it could grow by 139.51%. Given that Cleanspark has higher upside potential than TeraWulf, analysts believe Cleanspark is more attractive than TeraWulf.

TeraWulf has a beta of 2.612, which suggesting that the stock is 161.2% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cleanspark has a beta of 4.262, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 326.153%.

TeraWulf has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cleanspark offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. TeraWulf pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cleanspark pays out -2.35% of its earnings as a dividend.

TeraWulf quarterly revenues are $27.1M, which are smaller than Cleanspark quarterly revenues of $89.3M. TeraWulf's net income of -$22.7M is higher than Cleanspark's net income of -$62.2M. Notably, TeraWulf's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Cleanspark's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TeraWulf is 13.67x versus 5.81x for Cleanspark. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hut 8 has a net margin of -84.01% compared to TeraWulf's net margin of 1.53%. TeraWulf's return on equity of -19.09% beat Hut 8's return on equity of 40.35%.

TeraWulf has a consensus price target of $9.83, signalling upside risk potential of 78.46%. On the other hand Hut 8 has an analysts' consensus of $34.67 which suggests that it could grow by 47.52%. Given that TeraWulf has higher upside potential than Hut 8, analysts believe TeraWulf is more attractive than Hut 8.

TeraWulf has a beta of 2.612, which suggesting that the stock is 161.2% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hut 8 has a beta of 3.637, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 263.663%.

TeraWulf has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hut 8 offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. TeraWulf pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hut 8 pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

TeraWulf quarterly revenues are $27.1M, which are smaller than Hut 8 quarterly revenues of $42.2M. TeraWulf's net income of -$22.7M is lower than Hut 8's net income of $647K. Notably, TeraWulf's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Hut 8's PE ratio is 12.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TeraWulf is 13.67x versus 6.12x for Hut 8. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Riot Platforms has a net margin of -84.01% compared to TeraWulf's net margin of -182.06%. TeraWulf's return on equity of -19.09% beat Riot Platforms's return on equity of 0.56%.

TeraWulf has a consensus price target of $9.83, signalling upside risk potential of 78.46%. On the other hand Riot Platforms has an analysts' consensus of $17.70 which suggests that it could grow by 47.26%. Given that TeraWulf has higher upside potential than Riot Platforms, analysts believe TeraWulf is more attractive than Riot Platforms.

TeraWulf has a beta of 2.612, which suggesting that the stock is 161.2% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Riot Platforms has a beta of 4.216, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 321.609%.

TeraWulf has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Riot Platforms offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. TeraWulf pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Riot Platforms pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

TeraWulf quarterly revenues are $27.1M, which are smaller than Riot Platforms quarterly revenues of $84.8M. TeraWulf's net income of -$22.7M is higher than Riot Platforms's net income of -$154.4M. Notably, TeraWulf's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Riot Platforms's PE ratio is 60.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TeraWulf is 13.67x versus 9.67x for Riot Platforms. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Virtu Financial has a net margin of -84.01% compared to TeraWulf's net margin of 8.48%. TeraWulf's return on equity of -19.09% beat Virtu Financial's return on equity of 13.07%.

TeraWulf has a consensus price target of $9.83, signalling upside risk potential of 78.46%. On the other hand Virtu Financial has an analysts' consensus of $36.22 which suggests that it could fall by -2.08%. Given that TeraWulf has higher upside potential than Virtu Financial, analysts believe TeraWulf is more attractive than Virtu Financial.

TeraWulf has a beta of 2.612, which suggesting that the stock is 161.2% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Virtu Financial has a beta of 0.449, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.064%.

TeraWulf has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Virtu Financial offers a yield of 2.6% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. TeraWulf pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Virtu Financial pays out 215.53% of its earnings as a dividend.

TeraWulf quarterly revenues are $27.1M, which are smaller than Virtu Financial quarterly revenues of $706.8M. TeraWulf's net income of -$22.7M is lower than Virtu Financial's net income of $60M. Notably, TeraWulf's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Virtu Financial's PE ratio is 18.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TeraWulf is 13.67x versus 1.27x for Virtu Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.