CLSK Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Hut 8 has a net margin of -69.65% compared to Cleanspark's net margin of 1.53%. Cleanspark's return on equity of -11.93% beat Hut 8's return on equity of 40.35%.

Cleanspark has a consensus price target of $24.17, signalling upside risk potential of 125.65%. On the other hand Hut 8 has an analysts' consensus of $33.63 which suggests that it could grow by 34.59%. Given that Cleanspark has higher upside potential than Hut 8, analysts believe Cleanspark is more attractive than Hut 8.

Cleanspark has a beta of 4.262, which suggesting that the stock is 326.153% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hut 8 has a beta of 3.637, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 263.663%.

Cleanspark has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hut 8 offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cleanspark pays -2.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Hut 8 pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cleanspark quarterly revenues are $89.3M, which are larger than Hut 8 quarterly revenues of $42.2M. Cleanspark's net income of -$62.2M is lower than Hut 8's net income of $647K. Notably, Cleanspark's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Hut 8's PE ratio is 12.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cleanspark is 6.16x versus 6.47x for Hut 8. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MARA Holdings has a net margin of -69.65% compared to Cleanspark's net margin of -94.79%. Cleanspark's return on equity of -11.93% beat MARA Holdings's return on equity of 7.75%.

Cleanspark has a consensus price target of $24.17, signalling upside risk potential of 125.65%. On the other hand MARA Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $27.33 which suggests that it could grow by 43.33%. Given that Cleanspark has higher upside potential than MARA Holdings, analysts believe Cleanspark is more attractive than MARA Holdings.

Cleanspark has a beta of 4.262, which suggesting that the stock is 326.153% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MARA Holdings has a beta of 5.765, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 476.509%.

Cleanspark has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MARA Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cleanspark pays -2.35% of its earnings as a dividend. MARA Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cleanspark quarterly revenues are $89.3M, which are smaller than MARA Holdings quarterly revenues of $131.6M. Cleanspark's net income of -$62.2M is higher than MARA Holdings's net income of -$124.8M. Notably, Cleanspark's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while MARA Holdings's PE ratio is 21.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cleanspark is 6.16x versus 8.66x for MARA Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Riot Platforms has a net margin of -69.65% compared to Cleanspark's net margin of -182.06%. Cleanspark's return on equity of -11.93% beat Riot Platforms's return on equity of 0.56%.

Cleanspark has a consensus price target of $24.17, signalling upside risk potential of 125.65%. On the other hand Riot Platforms has an analysts' consensus of $17.90 which suggests that it could grow by 44.24%. Given that Cleanspark has higher upside potential than Riot Platforms, analysts believe Cleanspark is more attractive than Riot Platforms.

Cleanspark has a beta of 4.262, which suggesting that the stock is 326.153% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Riot Platforms has a beta of 4.216, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 321.609%.

Cleanspark has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Riot Platforms offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cleanspark pays -2.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Riot Platforms pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cleanspark quarterly revenues are $89.3M, which are larger than Riot Platforms quarterly revenues of $84.8M. Cleanspark's net income of -$62.2M is higher than Riot Platforms's net income of -$154.4M. Notably, Cleanspark's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Riot Platforms's PE ratio is 62.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cleanspark is 6.16x versus 9.98x for Riot Platforms. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

TeraWulf has a net margin of -69.65% compared to Cleanspark's net margin of -84.01%. Cleanspark's return on equity of -11.93% beat TeraWulf's return on equity of -19.09%.

Cleanspark has a consensus price target of $24.17, signalling upside risk potential of 125.65%. On the other hand TeraWulf has an analysts' consensus of $10.00 which suggests that it could grow by 63.13%. Given that Cleanspark has higher upside potential than TeraWulf, analysts believe Cleanspark is more attractive than TeraWulf.

Cleanspark has a beta of 4.262, which suggesting that the stock is 326.153% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TeraWulf has a beta of 2.612, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 161.2%.

Cleanspark has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. TeraWulf offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cleanspark pays -2.35% of its earnings as a dividend. TeraWulf pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cleanspark quarterly revenues are $89.3M, which are larger than TeraWulf quarterly revenues of $27.1M. Cleanspark's net income of -$62.2M is lower than TeraWulf's net income of -$22.7M. Notably, Cleanspark's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while TeraWulf's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cleanspark is 6.16x versus 15.21x for TeraWulf. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.