BLBD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

PACCAR has a net margin of 9.15% compared to Blue Bird's net margin of 6.79%. Blue Bird's return on equity of 82.17% beat PACCAR's return on equity of 19.56%.

Blue Bird has a consensus price target of $51.57, signalling upside risk potential of 38.56%. On the other hand PACCAR has an analysts' consensus of $101.67 which suggests that it could grow by 11.05%. Given that Blue Bird has higher upside potential than PACCAR, analysts believe Blue Bird is more attractive than PACCAR.

Blue Bird has a beta of 1.425, which suggesting that the stock is 42.543% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PACCAR has a beta of 0.964, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.626%.

Blue Bird has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. PACCAR offers a yield of 1.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share. Blue Bird pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. PACCAR pays out 54.99% of its earnings as a dividend. PACCAR's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Blue Bird quarterly revenues are $313.9M, which are smaller than PACCAR quarterly revenues of $7.4B. Blue Bird's net income of $28.7M is lower than PACCAR's net income of $505.1M. Notably, Blue Bird's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.52x while PACCAR's PE ratio is 13.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Blue Bird is 0.93x versus 1.49x for PACCAR. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Shyft Group has a net margin of 9.15% compared to Blue Bird's net margin of -0.7%. Blue Bird's return on equity of 82.17% beat The Shyft Group's return on equity of 0.18%.

Blue Bird has a consensus price target of $51.57, signalling upside risk potential of 38.56%. On the other hand The Shyft Group has an analysts' consensus of $15.50 which suggests that it could grow by 69.96%. Given that The Shyft Group has higher upside potential than Blue Bird, analysts believe The Shyft Group is more attractive than Blue Bird.

Blue Bird has a beta of 1.425, which suggesting that the stock is 42.543% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Shyft Group has a beta of 1.927, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 92.705%.

Blue Bird has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The Shyft Group offers a yield of 2.19% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Blue Bird pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. The Shyft Group pays out -249.59% of its earnings as a dividend.

Blue Bird quarterly revenues are $313.9M, which are larger than The Shyft Group quarterly revenues of $204.6M. Blue Bird's net income of $28.7M is higher than The Shyft Group's net income of -$1.4M. Notably, Blue Bird's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.52x while The Shyft Group's PE ratio is 912.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Blue Bird is 0.93x versus 0.40x for The Shyft Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies has a net margin of 9.15% compared to Blue Bird's net margin of 12.34%. Blue Bird's return on equity of 82.17% beat Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies's return on equity of 10.66%.

Blue Bird has a consensus price target of $51.57, signalling upside risk potential of 38.56%. On the other hand Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $211.36 which suggests that it could grow by 10.23%. Given that Blue Bird has higher upside potential than Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies, analysts believe Blue Bird is more attractive than Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies.

Blue Bird has a beta of 1.425, which suggesting that the stock is 42.543% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies has a beta of 1.123, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.32%.

Blue Bird has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies offers a yield of 0.44% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Blue Bird pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies pays out 13.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Blue Bird quarterly revenues are $313.9M, which are smaller than Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies quarterly revenues of $2.6B. Blue Bird's net income of $28.7M is lower than Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies's net income of $322M. Notably, Blue Bird's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.52x while Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies's PE ratio is 30.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Blue Bird is 0.93x versus 3.17x for Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Xos has a net margin of 9.15% compared to Blue Bird's net margin of -66.57%. Blue Bird's return on equity of 82.17% beat Xos's return on equity of -80.19%.

Blue Bird has a consensus price target of $51.57, signalling upside risk potential of 38.56%. On the other hand Xos has an analysts' consensus of $6.33 which suggests that it could grow by 64.93%. Given that Xos has higher upside potential than Blue Bird, analysts believe Xos is more attractive than Blue Bird.

Blue Bird has a beta of 1.425, which suggesting that the stock is 42.543% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Xos has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Blue Bird has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Xos offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Blue Bird pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Xos pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Blue Bird quarterly revenues are $313.9M, which are larger than Xos quarterly revenues of $15.8M. Blue Bird's net income of $28.7M is higher than Xos's net income of -$10.5M. Notably, Blue Bird's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.52x while Xos's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Blue Bird is 0.93x versus 0.51x for Xos. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.