BLBD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Oshkosh has a net margin of 7.04% compared to Blue Bird's net margin of 6.58%. Blue Bird's return on equity of 101.84% beat Oshkosh's return on equity of 17.78%.

Blue Bird has a consensus price target of $59.64, signalling upside risk potential of 42.93%. On the other hand Oshkosh has an analysts' consensus of $129.85 which suggests that it could grow by 29.55%. Given that Blue Bird has higher upside potential than Oshkosh, analysts believe Blue Bird is more attractive than Oshkosh.

Blue Bird has a beta of 1.583, which suggesting that the stock is 58.345% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oshkosh has a beta of 1.215, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.495%.

Blue Bird has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Oshkosh offers a yield of 2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share. Blue Bird pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Oshkosh pays out 17.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Oshkosh's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Blue Bird quarterly revenues are $350.2M, which are smaller than Oshkosh quarterly revenues of $2.7B. Blue Bird's net income of $24.7M is lower than Oshkosh's net income of $180.3M. Notably, Blue Bird's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.12x while Oshkosh's PE ratio is 8.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Blue Bird is 1.03x versus 0.57x for Oshkosh. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PACCAR has a net margin of 7.04% compared to Blue Bird's net margin of 11.8%. Blue Bird's return on equity of 101.84% beat PACCAR's return on equity of 27.64%.

Blue Bird has a consensus price target of $59.64, signalling upside risk potential of 42.93%. On the other hand PACCAR has an analysts' consensus of $115.35 which suggests that it could grow by 6.31%. Given that Blue Bird has higher upside potential than PACCAR, analysts believe Blue Bird is more attractive than PACCAR.

Blue Bird has a beta of 1.583, which suggesting that the stock is 58.345% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PACCAR has a beta of 0.927, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.304%.

Blue Bird has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. PACCAR offers a yield of 1.08% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $3.00 per share. Blue Bird pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. PACCAR pays out 33.01% of its earnings as a dividend. PACCAR's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Blue Bird quarterly revenues are $350.2M, which are smaller than PACCAR quarterly revenues of $8.2B. Blue Bird's net income of $24.7M is lower than PACCAR's net income of $972.1M. Notably, Blue Bird's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.12x while PACCAR's PE ratio is 12.12x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Blue Bird is 1.03x versus 1.64x for PACCAR. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Shyft Group has a net margin of 7.04% compared to Blue Bird's net margin of 1.61%. Blue Bird's return on equity of 101.84% beat The Shyft Group's return on equity of -1.51%.

Blue Bird has a consensus price target of $59.64, signalling upside risk potential of 42.93%. On the other hand The Shyft Group has an analysts' consensus of $15.00 which suggests that it could grow by 37.74%. Given that Blue Bird has higher upside potential than The Shyft Group, analysts believe Blue Bird is more attractive than The Shyft Group.

Blue Bird has a beta of 1.583, which suggesting that the stock is 58.345% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Shyft Group has a beta of 1.660, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 66.048%.

Blue Bird has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The Shyft Group offers a yield of 1.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Blue Bird pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. The Shyft Group pays out 109.44% of its earnings as a dividend.

Blue Bird quarterly revenues are $350.2M, which are larger than The Shyft Group quarterly revenues of $194.1M. Blue Bird's net income of $24.7M is higher than The Shyft Group's net income of $3.1M. Notably, Blue Bird's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.12x while The Shyft Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Blue Bird is 1.03x versus 0.48x for The Shyft Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Wabash National has a net margin of 7.04% compared to Blue Bird's net margin of -71.15%. Blue Bird's return on equity of 101.84% beat Wabash National's return on equity of -49.14%.

Blue Bird has a consensus price target of $59.64, signalling upside risk potential of 42.93%. On the other hand Wabash National has an analysts' consensus of $21.50 which suggests that it could grow by 27.67%. Given that Blue Bird has higher upside potential than Wabash National, analysts believe Blue Bird is more attractive than Wabash National.

Blue Bird has a beta of 1.583, which suggesting that the stock is 58.345% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Wabash National has a beta of 1.579, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.891%.

Blue Bird has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Wabash National offers a yield of 1.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Blue Bird pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Wabash National pays out 6.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Wabash National's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Blue Bird quarterly revenues are $350.2M, which are smaller than Wabash National quarterly revenues of $464M. Blue Bird's net income of $24.7M is higher than Wabash National's net income of -$330.2M. Notably, Blue Bird's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.12x while Wabash National's PE ratio is 5.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Blue Bird is 1.03x versus 0.36x for Wabash National. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.