PCAR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cummins has a net margin of 11.8% compared to PACCAR's net margin of 9.57%. PACCAR's return on equity of 27.64% beat Cummins's return on equity of 19.56%.

PACCAR has a consensus price target of $115.57, signalling upside risk potential of 8.02%. On the other hand Cummins has an analysts' consensus of $380.48 which suggests that it could grow by 7.21%. Given that PACCAR has higher upside potential than Cummins, analysts believe PACCAR is more attractive than Cummins.

PACCAR has a beta of 0.927, which suggesting that the stock is 7.304% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cummins has a beta of 1.010, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.96400000000001%.

PACCAR has a quarterly dividend of $3.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.1%. Cummins offers a yield of 1.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.82 per share. PACCAR pays 33.01% of its earnings as a dividend. Cummins pays out 125.31% of its earnings as a dividend. PACCAR's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Cummins's is not.

PACCAR quarterly revenues are $8.2B, which are smaller than Cummins quarterly revenues of $8.5B. PACCAR's net income of $972.1M is higher than Cummins's net income of $809M. Notably, PACCAR's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.91x while Cummins's PE ratio is 23.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PACCAR is 1.61x versus 1.46x for Cummins. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oshkosh has a net margin of 11.8% compared to PACCAR's net margin of 6.58%. PACCAR's return on equity of 27.64% beat Oshkosh's return on equity of 17.78%.

PACCAR has a consensus price target of $115.57, signalling upside risk potential of 8.02%. On the other hand Oshkosh has an analysts' consensus of $129.85 which suggests that it could grow by 33.21%. Given that Oshkosh has higher upside potential than PACCAR, analysts believe Oshkosh is more attractive than PACCAR.

PACCAR has a beta of 0.927, which suggesting that the stock is 7.304% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oshkosh has a beta of 1.215, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.495%.

PACCAR has a quarterly dividend of $3.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.1%. Oshkosh offers a yield of 2.06% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share. PACCAR pays 33.01% of its earnings as a dividend. Oshkosh pays out 17.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PACCAR quarterly revenues are $8.2B, which are larger than Oshkosh quarterly revenues of $2.7B. PACCAR's net income of $972.1M is higher than Oshkosh's net income of $180.3M. Notably, PACCAR's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.91x while Oshkosh's PE ratio is 8.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PACCAR is 1.61x versus 0.56x for Oshkosh. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Shyft Group has a net margin of 11.8% compared to PACCAR's net margin of 1.61%. PACCAR's return on equity of 27.64% beat The Shyft Group's return on equity of -1.51%.

PACCAR has a consensus price target of $115.57, signalling upside risk potential of 8.02%. On the other hand The Shyft Group has an analysts' consensus of $15.00 which suggests that it could grow by 45.49%. Given that The Shyft Group has higher upside potential than PACCAR, analysts believe The Shyft Group is more attractive than PACCAR.

PACCAR has a beta of 0.927, which suggesting that the stock is 7.304% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Shyft Group has a beta of 1.660, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 66.048%.

PACCAR has a quarterly dividend of $3.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.1%. The Shyft Group offers a yield of 1.94% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. PACCAR pays 33.01% of its earnings as a dividend. The Shyft Group pays out 109.44% of its earnings as a dividend. PACCAR's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but The Shyft Group's is not.

PACCAR quarterly revenues are $8.2B, which are larger than The Shyft Group quarterly revenues of $194.1M. PACCAR's net income of $972.1M is higher than The Shyft Group's net income of $3.1M. Notably, PACCAR's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.91x while The Shyft Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PACCAR is 1.61x versus 0.45x for The Shyft Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Xos has a net margin of 11.8% compared to PACCAR's net margin of -66.57%. PACCAR's return on equity of 27.64% beat Xos's return on equity of -80.19%.

PACCAR has a consensus price target of $115.57, signalling upside risk potential of 8.02%. On the other hand Xos has an analysts' consensus of $9.75 which suggests that it could grow by 174.65%. Given that Xos has higher upside potential than PACCAR, analysts believe Xos is more attractive than PACCAR.

PACCAR has a beta of 0.927, which suggesting that the stock is 7.304% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Xos has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

PACCAR has a quarterly dividend of $3.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.1%. Xos offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. PACCAR pays 33.01% of its earnings as a dividend. Xos pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. PACCAR's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PACCAR quarterly revenues are $8.2B, which are larger than Xos quarterly revenues of $15.8M. PACCAR's net income of $972.1M is higher than Xos's net income of -$10.5M. Notably, PACCAR's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.91x while Xos's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PACCAR is 1.61x versus 0.39x for Xos. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.