BPTH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

iBio has a net margin of -- compared to Bio-Path Holdings's net margin of -4444.57%. Bio-Path Holdings's return on equity of -- beat iBio's return on equity of -148.3%.

Bio-Path Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 934.48%. On the other hand iBio has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 46.94%. Given that Bio-Path Holdings has higher upside potential than iBio, analysts believe Bio-Path Holdings is more attractive than iBio.

Bio-Path Holdings has a beta of 0.083, which suggesting that the stock is 91.683% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iBio has a beta of -3.266, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 426.584%.

Bio-Path Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. iBio offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Bio-Path Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iBio pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Bio-Path Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iBio quarterly revenues of $175K. Bio-Path Holdings's net income of -$2.1M is higher than iBio's net income of -$4M. Notably, Bio-Path Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iBio's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bio-Path Holdings is -- versus -- for iBio. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NovaBay Pharmaceuticals has a net margin of -- compared to Bio-Path Holdings's net margin of -49.65%. Bio-Path Holdings's return on equity of -- beat NovaBay Pharmaceuticals's return on equity of -461.38%.

Bio-Path Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 934.48%. On the other hand NovaBay Pharmaceuticals has an analysts' consensus of $7.30 which suggests that it could grow by 503.14%. Given that Bio-Path Holdings has higher upside potential than NovaBay Pharmaceuticals, analysts believe Bio-Path Holdings is more attractive than NovaBay Pharmaceuticals.

Bio-Path Holdings has a beta of 0.083, which suggesting that the stock is 91.683% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NovaBay Pharmaceuticals has a beta of 0.646, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.372%.

Bio-Path Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NovaBay Pharmaceuticals offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Bio-Path Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NovaBay Pharmaceuticals pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Bio-Path Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than NovaBay Pharmaceuticals quarterly revenues of $2.4M. Bio-Path Holdings's net income of -$2.1M is lower than NovaBay Pharmaceuticals's net income of -$1.2M. Notably, Bio-Path Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NovaBay Pharmaceuticals's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bio-Path Holdings is -- versus 0.07x for NovaBay Pharmaceuticals. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Palatin Technologies has a net margin of -- compared to Bio-Path Holdings's net margin of -2357.27%. Bio-Path Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Palatin Technologies's return on equity of --.

Bio-Path Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 934.48%. On the other hand Palatin Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1140.88%. Given that Palatin Technologies has higher upside potential than Bio-Path Holdings, analysts believe Palatin Technologies is more attractive than Bio-Path Holdings.

Bio-Path Holdings has a beta of 0.083, which suggesting that the stock is 91.683% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Palatin Technologies has a beta of 0.901, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.929%.

Bio-Path Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Palatin Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Bio-Path Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Palatin Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Bio-Path Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Palatin Technologies quarterly revenues of $350K. Bio-Path Holdings's net income of -$2.1M is higher than Palatin Technologies's net income of -$7.8M. Notably, Bio-Path Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Palatin Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bio-Path Holdings is -- versus -- for Palatin Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Theriva Biologics has a net margin of -- compared to Bio-Path Holdings's net margin of --. Bio-Path Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Theriva Biologics's return on equity of --.

Bio-Path Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 934.48%. On the other hand Theriva Biologics has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 5591.82%. Given that Theriva Biologics has higher upside potential than Bio-Path Holdings, analysts believe Theriva Biologics is more attractive than Bio-Path Holdings.

Bio-Path Holdings has a beta of 0.083, which suggesting that the stock is 91.683% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Theriva Biologics has a beta of 1.234, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.367%.

Bio-Path Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Theriva Biologics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Bio-Path Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Theriva Biologics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Bio-Path Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Theriva Biologics quarterly revenues of --. Bio-Path Holdings's net income of -$2.1M is higher than Theriva Biologics's net income of -$7.7M. Notably, Bio-Path Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Theriva Biologics's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bio-Path Holdings is -- versus 1.59x for Theriva Biologics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.