CENX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Constellium SE has a net margin of 8.77% compared to Century Aluminum's net margin of 0.12%. Century Aluminum's return on equity of 63.58% beat Constellium SE's return on equity of 10.74%.

Century Aluminum has a consensus price target of $24.33, signalling upside risk potential of 25.88%. On the other hand Constellium SE has an analysts' consensus of $18.13 which suggests that it could grow by 68.38%. Given that Constellium SE has higher upside potential than Century Aluminum, analysts believe Constellium SE is more attractive than Century Aluminum.

Century Aluminum has a beta of 2.532, which suggesting that the stock is 153.235% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Constellium SE has a beta of 2.005, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 100.498%.

Century Aluminum has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Constellium SE offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Century Aluminum pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Constellium SE pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Century Aluminum quarterly revenues are $539.1M, which are smaller than Constellium SE quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Century Aluminum's net income of $47.3M is higher than Constellium SE's net income of $2.2M. Notably, Century Aluminum's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.46x while Constellium SE's PE ratio is 14.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Century Aluminum is 0.88x versus 0.22x for Constellium SE. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Fuse Group Holding has a net margin of 8.77% compared to Century Aluminum's net margin of --. Century Aluminum's return on equity of 63.58% beat Fuse Group Holding's return on equity of --.

Century Aluminum has a consensus price target of $24.33, signalling upside risk potential of 25.88%. On the other hand Fuse Group Holding has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Century Aluminum has higher upside potential than Fuse Group Holding, analysts believe Century Aluminum is more attractive than Fuse Group Holding.

Century Aluminum has a beta of 2.532, which suggesting that the stock is 153.235% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fuse Group Holding has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Century Aluminum has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Fuse Group Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Century Aluminum pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fuse Group Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Century Aluminum quarterly revenues are $539.1M, which are larger than Fuse Group Holding quarterly revenues of --. Century Aluminum's net income of $47.3M is higher than Fuse Group Holding's net income of --. Notably, Century Aluminum's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.46x while Fuse Group Holding's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Century Aluminum is 0.88x versus -- for Fuse Group Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kaiser Aluminum has a net margin of 8.77% compared to Century Aluminum's net margin of 1.61%. Century Aluminum's return on equity of 63.58% beat Kaiser Aluminum's return on equity of 7.2%.

Century Aluminum has a consensus price target of $24.33, signalling upside risk potential of 25.88%. On the other hand Kaiser Aluminum has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 15.09%. Given that Century Aluminum has higher upside potential than Kaiser Aluminum, analysts believe Century Aluminum is more attractive than Kaiser Aluminum.

Century Aluminum has a beta of 2.532, which suggesting that the stock is 153.235% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kaiser Aluminum has a beta of 1.350, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.032%.

Century Aluminum has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kaiser Aluminum offers a yield of 4.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share. Century Aluminum pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kaiser Aluminum pays out 106.78% of its earnings as a dividend.

Century Aluminum quarterly revenues are $539.1M, which are smaller than Kaiser Aluminum quarterly revenues of $747.7M. Century Aluminum's net income of $47.3M is higher than Kaiser Aluminum's net income of $12M. Notably, Century Aluminum's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.46x while Kaiser Aluminum's PE ratio is 24.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Century Aluminum is 0.88x versus 0.38x for Kaiser Aluminum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Steel Dynamics has a net margin of 8.77% compared to Century Aluminum's net margin of 7.32%. Century Aluminum's return on equity of 63.58% beat Steel Dynamics's return on equity of 19.51%.

Century Aluminum has a consensus price target of $24.33, signalling upside risk potential of 25.88%. On the other hand Steel Dynamics has an analysts' consensus of $137.56 which suggests that it could grow by 18.1%. Given that Century Aluminum has higher upside potential than Steel Dynamics, analysts believe Century Aluminum is more attractive than Steel Dynamics.

Century Aluminum has a beta of 2.532, which suggesting that the stock is 153.235% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Steel Dynamics has a beta of 1.358, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.817%.

Century Aluminum has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Steel Dynamics offers a yield of 1.58% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share. Century Aluminum pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Steel Dynamics pays out 11.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Steel Dynamics's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Century Aluminum quarterly revenues are $539.1M, which are smaller than Steel Dynamics quarterly revenues of $4.3B. Century Aluminum's net income of $47.3M is lower than Steel Dynamics's net income of $317.8M. Notably, Century Aluminum's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.46x while Steel Dynamics's PE ratio is 10.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Century Aluminum is 0.88x versus 1.03x for Steel Dynamics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.