CENX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cleveland-Cliffs has a net margin of 7.16% compared to Century Aluminum's net margin of -10.34%. Century Aluminum's return on equity of 60.03% beat Cleveland-Cliffs's return on equity of -10.21%.

Century Aluminum has a consensus price target of $23.33, signalling upside risk potential of 47.77%. On the other hand Cleveland-Cliffs has an analysts' consensus of $10.78 which suggests that it could grow by 50.11%. Given that Cleveland-Cliffs has higher upside potential than Century Aluminum, analysts believe Cleveland-Cliffs is more attractive than Century Aluminum.

Century Aluminum has a beta of 2.557, which suggesting that the stock is 155.662% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cleveland-Cliffs has a beta of 1.930, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 93.028%.

Century Aluminum has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cleveland-Cliffs offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Century Aluminum pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cleveland-Cliffs pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Century Aluminum quarterly revenues are $630.9M, which are smaller than Cleveland-Cliffs quarterly revenues of $4.3B. Century Aluminum's net income of $45.2M is higher than Cleveland-Cliffs's net income of -$447M. Notably, Century Aluminum's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.04x while Cleveland-Cliffs's PE ratio is 175.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Century Aluminum is 0.69x versus 0.18x for Cleveland-Cliffs. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Commercial Metals has a net margin of 7.16% compared to Century Aluminum's net margin of 1.45%. Century Aluminum's return on equity of 60.03% beat Commercial Metals's return on equity of 1.76%.

Century Aluminum has a consensus price target of $23.33, signalling upside risk potential of 47.77%. On the other hand Commercial Metals has an analysts' consensus of $53.32 which suggests that it could grow by 27.86%. Given that Century Aluminum has higher upside potential than Commercial Metals, analysts believe Century Aluminum is more attractive than Commercial Metals.

Century Aluminum has a beta of 2.557, which suggesting that the stock is 155.662% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Commercial Metals has a beta of 1.164, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.354%.

Century Aluminum has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Commercial Metals offers a yield of 1.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. Century Aluminum pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Commercial Metals pays out 16.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Commercial Metals's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Century Aluminum quarterly revenues are $630.9M, which are smaller than Commercial Metals quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Century Aluminum's net income of $45.2M is higher than Commercial Metals's net income of $25.5M. Notably, Century Aluminum's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.04x while Commercial Metals's PE ratio is 69.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Century Aluminum is 0.69x versus 0.62x for Commercial Metals. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kaiser Aluminum has a net margin of 7.16% compared to Century Aluminum's net margin of 0.93%. Century Aluminum's return on equity of 60.03% beat Kaiser Aluminum's return on equity of 7.06%.

Century Aluminum has a consensus price target of $23.33, signalling upside risk potential of 47.77%. On the other hand Kaiser Aluminum has an analysts' consensus of $89.00 which suggests that it could grow by 63.45%. Given that Kaiser Aluminum has higher upside potential than Century Aluminum, analysts believe Kaiser Aluminum is more attractive than Century Aluminum.

Century Aluminum has a beta of 2.557, which suggesting that the stock is 155.662% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kaiser Aluminum has a beta of 1.319, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.862%.

Century Aluminum has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kaiser Aluminum offers a yield of 5.66% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share. Century Aluminum pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kaiser Aluminum pays out 108.33% of its earnings as a dividend.

Century Aluminum quarterly revenues are $630.9M, which are smaller than Kaiser Aluminum quarterly revenues of $765.4M. Century Aluminum's net income of $45.2M is higher than Kaiser Aluminum's net income of $7.1M. Notably, Century Aluminum's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.04x while Kaiser Aluminum's PE ratio is 18.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Century Aluminum is 0.69x versus 0.29x for Kaiser Aluminum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Steel Dynamics has a net margin of 7.16% compared to Century Aluminum's net margin of 5.35%. Century Aluminum's return on equity of 60.03% beat Steel Dynamics's return on equity of 17.07%.

Century Aluminum has a consensus price target of $23.33, signalling upside risk potential of 47.77%. On the other hand Steel Dynamics has an analysts' consensus of $144.86 which suggests that it could grow by 23.59%. Given that Century Aluminum has higher upside potential than Steel Dynamics, analysts believe Century Aluminum is more attractive than Steel Dynamics.

Century Aluminum has a beta of 2.557, which suggesting that the stock is 155.662% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Steel Dynamics has a beta of 1.347, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.654%.

Century Aluminum has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Steel Dynamics offers a yield of 1.6% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Century Aluminum pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Steel Dynamics pays out 18.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Steel Dynamics's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Century Aluminum quarterly revenues are $630.9M, which are smaller than Steel Dynamics quarterly revenues of $3.9B. Century Aluminum's net income of $45.2M is lower than Steel Dynamics's net income of $207.3M. Notably, Century Aluminum's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.04x while Steel Dynamics's PE ratio is 11.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Century Aluminum is 0.69x versus 1.04x for Steel Dynamics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.