KALU Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Century Aluminum has a net margin of 0.93% compared to Kaiser Aluminum's net margin of 7.16%. Kaiser Aluminum's return on equity of 7.06% beat Century Aluminum's return on equity of 60.03%.

Kaiser Aluminum has a consensus price target of $79.67, signalling upside risk potential of 56.98%. On the other hand Century Aluminum has an analysts' consensus of $26.00 which suggests that it could grow by 73.39%. Given that Century Aluminum has higher upside potential than Kaiser Aluminum, analysts believe Century Aluminum is more attractive than Kaiser Aluminum.

Kaiser Aluminum has a beta of 1.319, which suggesting that the stock is 31.862% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Century Aluminum has a beta of 2.557, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 155.662%.

Kaiser Aluminum has a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.07%. Century Aluminum offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kaiser Aluminum pays 108.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Century Aluminum pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Kaiser Aluminum quarterly revenues are $765.4M, which are larger than Century Aluminum quarterly revenues of $630.9M. Kaiser Aluminum's net income of $7.1M is lower than Century Aluminum's net income of $45.2M. Notably, Kaiser Aluminum's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.68x while Century Aluminum's PE ratio is 4.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kaiser Aluminum is 0.27x versus 0.65x for Century Aluminum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cleveland-Cliffs has a net margin of 0.93% compared to Kaiser Aluminum's net margin of -10.34%. Kaiser Aluminum's return on equity of 7.06% beat Cleveland-Cliffs's return on equity of -10.21%.

Kaiser Aluminum has a consensus price target of $79.67, signalling upside risk potential of 56.98%. On the other hand Cleveland-Cliffs has an analysts' consensus of $11.78 which suggests that it could grow by 69.22%. Given that Cleveland-Cliffs has higher upside potential than Kaiser Aluminum, analysts believe Cleveland-Cliffs is more attractive than Kaiser Aluminum.

Kaiser Aluminum has a beta of 1.319, which suggesting that the stock is 31.862% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cleveland-Cliffs has a beta of 1.930, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 93.028%.

Kaiser Aluminum has a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.07%. Cleveland-Cliffs offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kaiser Aluminum pays 108.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Cleveland-Cliffs pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Kaiser Aluminum quarterly revenues are $765.4M, which are smaller than Cleveland-Cliffs quarterly revenues of $4.3B. Kaiser Aluminum's net income of $7.1M is higher than Cleveland-Cliffs's net income of -$447M. Notably, Kaiser Aluminum's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.68x while Cleveland-Cliffs's PE ratio is 175.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kaiser Aluminum is 0.27x versus 0.17x for Cleveland-Cliffs. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Commercial Metals has a net margin of 0.93% compared to Kaiser Aluminum's net margin of 1.45%. Kaiser Aluminum's return on equity of 7.06% beat Commercial Metals's return on equity of 1.76%.

Kaiser Aluminum has a consensus price target of $79.67, signalling upside risk potential of 56.98%. On the other hand Commercial Metals has an analysts' consensus of $57.10 which suggests that it could grow by 39.43%. Given that Kaiser Aluminum has higher upside potential than Commercial Metals, analysts believe Kaiser Aluminum is more attractive than Commercial Metals.

Kaiser Aluminum has a beta of 1.319, which suggesting that the stock is 31.862% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Commercial Metals has a beta of 1.164, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.354%.

Kaiser Aluminum has a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.07%. Commercial Metals offers a yield of 1.76% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. Kaiser Aluminum pays 108.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Commercial Metals pays out 16.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Commercial Metals's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Kaiser Aluminum's is not.

Kaiser Aluminum quarterly revenues are $765.4M, which are smaller than Commercial Metals quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Kaiser Aluminum's net income of $7.1M is lower than Commercial Metals's net income of $25.5M. Notably, Kaiser Aluminum's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.68x while Commercial Metals's PE ratio is 68.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kaiser Aluminum is 0.27x versus 0.61x for Commercial Metals. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Steel Dynamics has a net margin of 0.93% compared to Kaiser Aluminum's net margin of 5.35%. Kaiser Aluminum's return on equity of 7.06% beat Steel Dynamics's return on equity of 17.07%.

Kaiser Aluminum has a consensus price target of $79.67, signalling upside risk potential of 56.98%. On the other hand Steel Dynamics has an analysts' consensus of $146.09 which suggests that it could grow by 33.77%. Given that Kaiser Aluminum has higher upside potential than Steel Dynamics, analysts believe Kaiser Aluminum is more attractive than Steel Dynamics.

Kaiser Aluminum has a beta of 1.319, which suggesting that the stock is 31.862% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Steel Dynamics has a beta of 1.347, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.654%.

Kaiser Aluminum has a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.07%. Steel Dynamics offers a yield of 1.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Kaiser Aluminum pays 108.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Steel Dynamics pays out 18.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Steel Dynamics's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Kaiser Aluminum's is not.

Kaiser Aluminum quarterly revenues are $765.4M, which are smaller than Steel Dynamics quarterly revenues of $3.9B. Kaiser Aluminum's net income of $7.1M is lower than Steel Dynamics's net income of $207.3M. Notably, Kaiser Aluminum's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.68x while Steel Dynamics's PE ratio is 11.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kaiser Aluminum is 0.27x versus 0.97x for Steel Dynamics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.