CLAR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Document Security Systems has a net margin of -91.76% compared to Clarus's net margin of --. Clarus's return on equity of -18.01% beat Document Security Systems's return on equity of --.

Clarus has a consensus price target of $4.75, signalling upside risk potential of 35.76%. On the other hand Document Security Systems has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Clarus has higher upside potential than Document Security Systems, analysts believe Clarus is more attractive than Document Security Systems.

Clarus has a beta of 0.864, which suggesting that the stock is 13.561% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Document Security Systems has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Clarus has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.86%. Document Security Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Clarus pays -7.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Document Security Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Clarus quarterly revenues are $71.4M, which are larger than Document Security Systems quarterly revenues of --. Clarus's net income of -$65.5M is higher than Document Security Systems's net income of --. Notably, Clarus's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.88x while Document Security Systems's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Clarus is 0.51x versus -- for Document Security Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Escalade has a net margin of -91.76% compared to Clarus's net margin of 4.72%. Clarus's return on equity of -18.01% beat Escalade's return on equity of 8.25%.

Clarus has a consensus price target of $4.75, signalling upside risk potential of 35.76%. On the other hand Escalade has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 33.33%. Given that Clarus has higher upside potential than Escalade, analysts believe Clarus is more attractive than Escalade.

Clarus has a beta of 0.864, which suggesting that the stock is 13.561% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Escalade has a beta of 0.884, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.644%.

Clarus has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.86%. Escalade offers a yield of 4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Clarus pays -7.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Escalade pays out 63.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Escalade's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Clarus quarterly revenues are $71.4M, which are larger than Escalade quarterly revenues of $55.5M. Clarus's net income of -$65.5M is lower than Escalade's net income of $2.6M. Notably, Clarus's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.88x while Escalade's PE ratio is 15.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Clarus is 0.51x versus 0.84x for Escalade. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Goodyear Tire & Rubber has a net margin of -91.76% compared to Clarus's net margin of 2.7%. Clarus's return on equity of -18.01% beat Goodyear Tire & Rubber's return on equity of 4.93%.

Clarus has a consensus price target of $4.75, signalling upside risk potential of 35.76%. On the other hand Goodyear Tire & Rubber has an analysts' consensus of $12.53 which suggests that it could grow by 14.56%. Given that Clarus has higher upside potential than Goodyear Tire & Rubber, analysts believe Clarus is more attractive than Goodyear Tire & Rubber.

Clarus has a beta of 0.864, which suggesting that the stock is 13.561% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Goodyear Tire & Rubber has a beta of 1.418, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.782%.

Clarus has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.86%. Goodyear Tire & Rubber offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Clarus pays -7.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Goodyear Tire & Rubber pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Clarus quarterly revenues are $71.4M, which are smaller than Goodyear Tire & Rubber quarterly revenues of $4.3B. Clarus's net income of -$65.5M is lower than Goodyear Tire & Rubber's net income of $115M. Notably, Clarus's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.88x while Goodyear Tire & Rubber's PE ratio is 13.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Clarus is 0.51x versus 0.17x for Goodyear Tire & Rubber. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Yunhong Green CTI has a net margin of -91.76% compared to Clarus's net margin of -46.97%. Clarus's return on equity of -18.01% beat Yunhong Green CTI's return on equity of -25.74%.

Clarus has a consensus price target of $4.75, signalling upside risk potential of 35.76%. On the other hand Yunhong Green CTI has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 600%. Given that Yunhong Green CTI has higher upside potential than Clarus, analysts believe Yunhong Green CTI is more attractive than Clarus.

Clarus has a beta of 0.864, which suggesting that the stock is 13.561% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Yunhong Green CTI has a beta of 0.191, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 80.9%.

Clarus has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.86%. Yunhong Green CTI offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Clarus pays -7.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Yunhong Green CTI pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Clarus quarterly revenues are $71.4M, which are larger than Yunhong Green CTI quarterly revenues of $2.5M. Clarus's net income of -$65.5M is lower than Yunhong Green CTI's net income of -$1.2M. Notably, Clarus's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.88x while Yunhong Green CTI's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Clarus is 0.51x versus 1.30x for Yunhong Green CTI. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.