DKNG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Flutter Entertainment PLC has a net margin of -9.68% compared to DraftKings's net margin of 3.43%. DraftKings's return on equity of -50.16% beat Flutter Entertainment PLC's return on equity of 0.95%.

DraftKings has a consensus price target of $57.48, signalling upside risk potential of 77.39%. On the other hand Flutter Entertainment PLC has an analysts' consensus of $318.46 which suggests that it could grow by 46.34%. Given that DraftKings has higher upside potential than Flutter Entertainment PLC, analysts believe DraftKings is more attractive than Flutter Entertainment PLC.

DraftKings has a beta of 2.160, which suggesting that the stock is 115.979% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Flutter Entertainment PLC has a beta of 1.334, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.395%.

DraftKings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Flutter Entertainment PLC offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. DraftKings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Flutter Entertainment PLC pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

DraftKings quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are smaller than Flutter Entertainment PLC quarterly revenues of $3.8B. DraftKings's net income of -$134.9M is lower than Flutter Entertainment PLC's net income of $130M. Notably, DraftKings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Flutter Entertainment PLC's PE ratio is 989.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for DraftKings is 3.34x versus 2.80x for Flutter Entertainment PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

GAN has a net margin of -9.68% compared to DraftKings's net margin of -13.1%. DraftKings's return on equity of -50.16% beat GAN's return on equity of -870.33%.

DraftKings has a consensus price target of $57.48, signalling upside risk potential of 77.39%. On the other hand GAN has an analysts' consensus of $1.97 which suggests that it could grow by 11.62%. Given that DraftKings has higher upside potential than GAN, analysts believe DraftKings is more attractive than GAN.

DraftKings has a beta of 2.160, which suggesting that the stock is 115.979% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GAN has a beta of 3.673, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 267.346%.

DraftKings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. GAN offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. DraftKings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. GAN pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

DraftKings quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than GAN quarterly revenues of $31.7M. DraftKings's net income of -$134.9M is lower than GAN's net income of -$4.2M. Notably, DraftKings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while GAN's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for DraftKings is 3.34x versus 0.60x for GAN. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rush Street Interactive has a net margin of -9.68% compared to DraftKings's net margin of 0.8%. DraftKings's return on equity of -50.16% beat Rush Street Interactive's return on equity of 1.32%.

DraftKings has a consensus price target of $57.48, signalling upside risk potential of 77.39%. On the other hand Rush Street Interactive has an analysts' consensus of $15.86 which suggests that it could grow by 47.1%. Given that DraftKings has higher upside potential than Rush Street Interactive, analysts believe DraftKings is more attractive than Rush Street Interactive.

DraftKings has a beta of 2.160, which suggesting that the stock is 115.979% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rush Street Interactive has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

DraftKings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Rush Street Interactive offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. DraftKings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rush Street Interactive pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

DraftKings quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Rush Street Interactive quarterly revenues of $254.2M. DraftKings's net income of -$134.9M is lower than Rush Street Interactive's net income of $2M. Notably, DraftKings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Rush Street Interactive's PE ratio is 574.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for DraftKings is 3.34x versus 1.40x for Rush Street Interactive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SharpLink Gaming has a net margin of -9.68% compared to DraftKings's net margin of -109.62%. DraftKings's return on equity of -50.16% beat SharpLink Gaming's return on equity of 15958.29%.

DraftKings has a consensus price target of $57.48, signalling upside risk potential of 77.39%. On the other hand SharpLink Gaming has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that DraftKings has higher upside potential than SharpLink Gaming, analysts believe DraftKings is more attractive than SharpLink Gaming.

DraftKings has a beta of 2.160, which suggesting that the stock is 115.979% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SharpLink Gaming has a beta of 1.368, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.786%.

DraftKings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SharpLink Gaming offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. DraftKings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SharpLink Gaming pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

DraftKings quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than SharpLink Gaming quarterly revenues of $823.4K. DraftKings's net income of -$134.9M is lower than SharpLink Gaming's net income of -$902.7K. Notably, DraftKings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SharpLink Gaming's PE ratio is 0.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for DraftKings is 3.34x versus 0.26x for SharpLink Gaming. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.