BYD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Full House Resorts has a net margin of 16.38% compared to Boyd Gaming's net margin of -16.86%. Boyd Gaming's return on equity of 34.3% beat Full House Resorts's return on equity of -68.49%.

Boyd Gaming has a consensus price target of $83.08, signalling upside risk potential of 23%. On the other hand Full House Resorts has an analysts' consensus of $5.63 which suggests that it could grow by 60.26%. Given that Full House Resorts has higher upside potential than Boyd Gaming, analysts believe Full House Resorts is more attractive than Boyd Gaming.

Boyd Gaming has a beta of 1.310, which suggesting that the stock is 30.96% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Full House Resorts has a beta of 1.675, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 67.469%.

Boyd Gaming has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.02%. Full House Resorts offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Boyd Gaming pays 10.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Full House Resorts pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Boyd Gaming's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Boyd Gaming quarterly revenues are $1B, which are larger than Full House Resorts quarterly revenues of $73M. Boyd Gaming's net income of $170.5M is higher than Full House Resorts's net income of -$12.3M. Notably, Boyd Gaming's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.86x while Full House Resorts's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Boyd Gaming is 1.60x versus 0.42x for Full House Resorts. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Flutter Entertainment PLC has a net margin of 16.38% compared to Boyd Gaming's net margin of 3.43%. Boyd Gaming's return on equity of 34.3% beat Flutter Entertainment PLC's return on equity of 0.95%.

Boyd Gaming has a consensus price target of $83.08, signalling upside risk potential of 23%. On the other hand Flutter Entertainment PLC has an analysts' consensus of $315.63 which suggests that it could grow by 33.36%. Given that Flutter Entertainment PLC has higher upside potential than Boyd Gaming, analysts believe Flutter Entertainment PLC is more attractive than Boyd Gaming.

Boyd Gaming has a beta of 1.310, which suggesting that the stock is 30.96% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Flutter Entertainment PLC has a beta of 1.334, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.395%.

Boyd Gaming has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.02%. Flutter Entertainment PLC offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Boyd Gaming pays 10.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Flutter Entertainment PLC pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Boyd Gaming's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Boyd Gaming quarterly revenues are $1B, which are smaller than Flutter Entertainment PLC quarterly revenues of $3.8B. Boyd Gaming's net income of $170.5M is higher than Flutter Entertainment PLC's net income of $130M. Notably, Boyd Gaming's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.86x while Flutter Entertainment PLC's PE ratio is 1,075.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Boyd Gaming is 1.60x versus 3.04x for Flutter Entertainment PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Golden Entertainment has a net margin of 16.38% compared to Boyd Gaming's net margin of 1.81%. Boyd Gaming's return on equity of 34.3% beat Golden Entertainment's return on equity of 9.63%.

Boyd Gaming has a consensus price target of $83.08, signalling upside risk potential of 23%. On the other hand Golden Entertainment has an analysts' consensus of $36.86 which suggests that it could grow by 38.46%. Given that Golden Entertainment has higher upside potential than Boyd Gaming, analysts believe Golden Entertainment is more attractive than Boyd Gaming.

Boyd Gaming has a beta of 1.310, which suggesting that the stock is 30.96% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Golden Entertainment has a beta of 1.989, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 98.898%.

Boyd Gaming has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.02%. Golden Entertainment offers a yield of 3.76% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Boyd Gaming pays 10.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Golden Entertainment pays out 42% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Boyd Gaming quarterly revenues are $1B, which are larger than Golden Entertainment quarterly revenues of $164.2M. Boyd Gaming's net income of $170.5M is higher than Golden Entertainment's net income of $3M. Notably, Boyd Gaming's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.86x while Golden Entertainment's PE ratio is 15.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Boyd Gaming is 1.60x versus 1.18x for Golden Entertainment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Red Rock Resorts has a net margin of 16.38% compared to Boyd Gaming's net margin of 9.4%. Boyd Gaming's return on equity of 34.3% beat Red Rock Resorts's return on equity of 64.1%.

Boyd Gaming has a consensus price target of $83.08, signalling upside risk potential of 23%. On the other hand Red Rock Resorts has an analysts' consensus of $56.46 which suggests that it could grow by 33.13%. Given that Red Rock Resorts has higher upside potential than Boyd Gaming, analysts believe Red Rock Resorts is more attractive than Boyd Gaming.

Boyd Gaming has a beta of 1.310, which suggesting that the stock is 30.96% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Red Rock Resorts has a beta of 1.690, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 69.015%.

Boyd Gaming has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.02%. Red Rock Resorts offers a yield of 2.36% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Boyd Gaming pays 10.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Red Rock Resorts pays out 76.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Boyd Gaming quarterly revenues are $1B, which are larger than Red Rock Resorts quarterly revenues of $495.7M. Boyd Gaming's net income of $170.5M is higher than Red Rock Resorts's net income of $46.6M. Notably, Boyd Gaming's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.86x while Red Rock Resorts's PE ratio is 16.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Boyd Gaming is 1.60x versus 2.03x for Red Rock Resorts. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.