FORR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Blink Charging has a net margin of -97.1% compared to Forrester Research's net margin of -244.28%. Forrester Research's return on equity of -40% beat Blink Charging's return on equity of -56.43%.

Forrester Research has a consensus price target of $14.00, signalling upside risk potential of 37.66%. On the other hand Blink Charging has an analysts' consensus of $2.42 which suggests that it could grow by 210.99%. Given that Blink Charging has higher upside potential than Forrester Research, analysts believe Blink Charging is more attractive than Forrester Research.

Forrester Research has a beta of 0.943, which suggesting that the stock is 5.722% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Blink Charging has a beta of 3.338, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 233.819%.

Forrester Research has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Blink Charging offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Forrester Research pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Blink Charging pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Forrester Research quarterly revenues are $89.9M, which are larger than Blink Charging quarterly revenues of $30.1M. Forrester Research's net income of -$87.3M is lower than Blink Charging's net income of -$73.5M. Notably, Forrester Research's price-to-earnings ratio is 239.75x while Blink Charging's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Forrester Research is 0.46x versus 0.63x for Blink Charging. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gold Rock Holdings has a net margin of -97.1% compared to Forrester Research's net margin of -117.27%. Forrester Research's return on equity of -40% beat Gold Rock Holdings's return on equity of -98.68%.

Forrester Research has a consensus price target of $14.00, signalling upside risk potential of 37.66%. On the other hand Gold Rock Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Forrester Research has higher upside potential than Gold Rock Holdings, analysts believe Forrester Research is more attractive than Gold Rock Holdings.

Forrester Research has a beta of 0.943, which suggesting that the stock is 5.722% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gold Rock Holdings has a beta of 7,170.702, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 716970.209%.

Forrester Research has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Gold Rock Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Forrester Research pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Gold Rock Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Forrester Research quarterly revenues are $89.9M, which are larger than Gold Rock Holdings quarterly revenues of $67.5K. Forrester Research's net income of -$87.3M is lower than Gold Rock Holdings's net income of -$79.2K. Notably, Forrester Research's price-to-earnings ratio is 239.75x while Gold Rock Holdings's PE ratio is 37.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Forrester Research is 0.46x versus 30.05x for Gold Rock Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

One World Universe has a net margin of -97.1% compared to Forrester Research's net margin of --. Forrester Research's return on equity of -40% beat One World Universe's return on equity of --.

Forrester Research has a consensus price target of $14.00, signalling upside risk potential of 37.66%. On the other hand One World Universe has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Forrester Research has higher upside potential than One World Universe, analysts believe Forrester Research is more attractive than One World Universe.

Forrester Research has a beta of 0.943, which suggesting that the stock is 5.722% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison One World Universe has a beta of 4.143, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 314.334%.

Forrester Research has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. One World Universe offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Forrester Research pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. One World Universe pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Forrester Research quarterly revenues are $89.9M, which are larger than One World Universe quarterly revenues of --. Forrester Research's net income of -$87.3M is higher than One World Universe's net income of --. Notably, Forrester Research's price-to-earnings ratio is 239.75x while One World Universe's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Forrester Research is 0.46x versus -- for One World Universe. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SBC Medical Group Holdings has a net margin of -97.1% compared to Forrester Research's net margin of 5.34%. Forrester Research's return on equity of -40% beat SBC Medical Group Holdings's return on equity of 25.89%.

Forrester Research has a consensus price target of $14.00, signalling upside risk potential of 37.66%. On the other hand SBC Medical Group Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $6.00 which suggests that it could grow by 71.43%. Given that SBC Medical Group Holdings has higher upside potential than Forrester Research, analysts believe SBC Medical Group Holdings is more attractive than Forrester Research.

Forrester Research has a beta of 0.943, which suggesting that the stock is 5.722% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SBC Medical Group Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Forrester Research has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SBC Medical Group Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Forrester Research pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SBC Medical Group Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Forrester Research quarterly revenues are $89.9M, which are larger than SBC Medical Group Holdings quarterly revenues of $53.1M. Forrester Research's net income of -$87.3M is lower than SBC Medical Group Holdings's net income of $2.8M. Notably, Forrester Research's price-to-earnings ratio is 239.75x while SBC Medical Group Holdings's PE ratio is 8.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Forrester Research is 0.46x versus 1.64x for SBC Medical Group Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.