SBC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Blink Charging has a net margin of 5.34% compared to SBC Medical Group Holdings's net margin of -244.28%. SBC Medical Group Holdings's return on equity of 25.89% beat Blink Charging's return on equity of -56.43%.

SBC Medical Group Holdings has a consensus price target of $6.00, signalling upside risk potential of 42.86%. On the other hand Blink Charging has an analysts' consensus of $2.79 which suggests that it could grow by 272.72%. Given that Blink Charging has higher upside potential than SBC Medical Group Holdings, analysts believe Blink Charging is more attractive than SBC Medical Group Holdings.

SBC Medical Group Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Blink Charging has a beta of 2.940, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 193.966%.

SBC Medical Group Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Blink Charging offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SBC Medical Group Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Blink Charging pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

SBC Medical Group Holdings quarterly revenues are $53.1M, which are larger than Blink Charging quarterly revenues of $30.1M. SBC Medical Group Holdings's net income of $2.8M is higher than Blink Charging's net income of -$73.5M. Notably, SBC Medical Group Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.10x while Blink Charging's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SBC Medical Group Holdings is 1.97x versus 0.61x for Blink Charging. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Forrester Research has a net margin of 5.34% compared to SBC Medical Group Holdings's net margin of 0.4%. SBC Medical Group Holdings's return on equity of 25.89% beat Forrester Research's return on equity of -2.45%.

SBC Medical Group Holdings has a consensus price target of $6.00, signalling upside risk potential of 42.86%. On the other hand Forrester Research has an analysts' consensus of $15.00 which suggests that it could grow by 67.79%. Given that Forrester Research has higher upside potential than SBC Medical Group Holdings, analysts believe Forrester Research is more attractive than SBC Medical Group Holdings.

SBC Medical Group Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Forrester Research has a beta of 0.932, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.814%.

SBC Medical Group Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Forrester Research offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SBC Medical Group Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Forrester Research pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

SBC Medical Group Holdings quarterly revenues are $53.1M, which are smaller than Forrester Research quarterly revenues of $108M. SBC Medical Group Holdings's net income of $2.8M is higher than Forrester Research's net income of $432K. Notably, SBC Medical Group Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.10x while Forrester Research's PE ratio is 239.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SBC Medical Group Holdings is 1.97x versus 0.39x for Forrester Research. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gold Rock Holdings has a net margin of 5.34% compared to SBC Medical Group Holdings's net margin of -3.79%. SBC Medical Group Holdings's return on equity of 25.89% beat Gold Rock Holdings's return on equity of --.

SBC Medical Group Holdings has a consensus price target of $6.00, signalling upside risk potential of 42.86%. On the other hand Gold Rock Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SBC Medical Group Holdings has higher upside potential than Gold Rock Holdings, analysts believe SBC Medical Group Holdings is more attractive than Gold Rock Holdings.

SBC Medical Group Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gold Rock Holdings has a beta of 6,050.483, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 604948.33%.

SBC Medical Group Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Gold Rock Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SBC Medical Group Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Gold Rock Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

SBC Medical Group Holdings quarterly revenues are $53.1M, which are larger than Gold Rock Holdings quarterly revenues of $66K. SBC Medical Group Holdings's net income of $2.8M is higher than Gold Rock Holdings's net income of -$2.5K. Notably, SBC Medical Group Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.10x while Gold Rock Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SBC Medical Group Holdings is 1.97x versus -- for Gold Rock Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

One World Universe has a net margin of 5.34% compared to SBC Medical Group Holdings's net margin of --. SBC Medical Group Holdings's return on equity of 25.89% beat One World Universe's return on equity of --.

SBC Medical Group Holdings has a consensus price target of $6.00, signalling upside risk potential of 42.86%. On the other hand One World Universe has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SBC Medical Group Holdings has higher upside potential than One World Universe, analysts believe SBC Medical Group Holdings is more attractive than One World Universe.

SBC Medical Group Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison One World Universe has a beta of 3.089, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 208.883%.

SBC Medical Group Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. One World Universe offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SBC Medical Group Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. One World Universe pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

SBC Medical Group Holdings quarterly revenues are $53.1M, which are larger than One World Universe quarterly revenues of --. SBC Medical Group Holdings's net income of $2.8M is higher than One World Universe's net income of --. Notably, SBC Medical Group Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.10x while One World Universe's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SBC Medical Group Holdings is 1.97x versus -- for One World Universe. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.