GAIA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cineverse has a net margin of -5.38% compared to Gaia's net margin of -10.1%. Gaia's return on equity of -6.96% beat Cineverse's return on equity of -60.86%.

Gaia has a consensus price target of $6.00, signalling upside risk potential of 79.49%. On the other hand Cineverse has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 89.39%. Given that Cineverse has higher upside potential than Gaia, analysts believe Cineverse is more attractive than Gaia.

Gaia has a beta of 0.623, which suggesting that the stock is 37.665% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cineverse has a beta of 1.632, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.243%.

Gaia has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cineverse offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Gaia pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cineverse pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Gaia quarterly revenues are $22.2M, which are larger than Cineverse quarterly revenues of $12.7M. Gaia's net income of -$1.2M is higher than Cineverse's net income of -$1.3M. Notably, Gaia's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Cineverse's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gaia is 1.22x versus 1.28x for Cineverse. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Liberty Formula One Group has a net margin of -5.38% compared to Gaia's net margin of 12.84%. Gaia's return on equity of -6.96% beat Liberty Formula One Group's return on equity of 4.15%.

Gaia has a consensus price target of $6.00, signalling upside risk potential of 79.49%. On the other hand Liberty Formula One Group has an analysts' consensus of $93.40 which suggests that it could grow by 8.64%. Given that Gaia has higher upside potential than Liberty Formula One Group, analysts believe Gaia is more attractive than Liberty Formula One Group.

Gaia has a beta of 0.623, which suggesting that the stock is 37.665% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Liberty Formula One Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Gaia has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Liberty Formula One Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.23 per share. Gaia pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Liberty Formula One Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Gaia quarterly revenues are $22.2M, which are smaller than Liberty Formula One Group quarterly revenues of $911M. Gaia's net income of -$1.2M is lower than Liberty Formula One Group's net income of $117M. Notably, Gaia's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Liberty Formula One Group's PE ratio is 74.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gaia is 1.22x versus 5.56x for Liberty Formula One Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paramount Global has a net margin of -5.38% compared to Gaia's net margin of 0.02%. Gaia's return on equity of -6.96% beat Paramount Global's return on equity of -26.78%.

Gaia has a consensus price target of $6.00, signalling upside risk potential of 79.49%. On the other hand Paramount Global has an analysts' consensus of $12.77 which suggests that it could grow by 22.27%. Given that Gaia has higher upside potential than Paramount Global, analysts believe Gaia is more attractive than Paramount Global.

Gaia has a beta of 0.623, which suggesting that the stock is 37.665% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Global has a beta of 1.712, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 71.201%.

Gaia has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Paramount Global offers a yield of 1.92% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Gaia pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Global pays out -73.52% of its earnings as a dividend.

Gaia quarterly revenues are $22.2M, which are smaller than Paramount Global quarterly revenues of $6.7B. Gaia's net income of -$1.2M is lower than Paramount Global's net income of $1M. Notably, Gaia's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Paramount Global's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gaia is 1.22x versus 0.24x for Paramount Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Dave & Buster's Entertainment has a net margin of -5.38% compared to Gaia's net margin of -7.22%. Gaia's return on equity of -6.96% beat Dave & Buster's Entertainment's return on equity of 33.6%.

Gaia has a consensus price target of $6.00, signalling upside risk potential of 79.49%. On the other hand Dave & Buster's Entertainment has an analysts' consensus of $39.71 which suggests that it could grow by 34.4%. Given that Gaia has higher upside potential than Dave & Buster's Entertainment, analysts believe Gaia is more attractive than Dave & Buster's Entertainment.

Gaia has a beta of 0.623, which suggesting that the stock is 37.665% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dave & Buster's Entertainment has a beta of 2.126, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 112.605%.

Gaia has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Dave & Buster's Entertainment offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Gaia pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Dave & Buster's Entertainment pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Gaia quarterly revenues are $22.2M, which are smaller than Dave & Buster's Entertainment quarterly revenues of $453M. Gaia's net income of -$1.2M is higher than Dave & Buster's Entertainment's net income of -$32.7M. Notably, Gaia's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Dave & Buster's Entertainment's PE ratio is 14.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gaia is 1.22x versus 0.55x for Dave & Buster's Entertainment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.