GILT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Clearfield has a net margin of 15.06% compared to Gilat Satellite Networks's net margin of -5.37%. Gilat Satellite Networks's return on equity of 8.66% beat Clearfield's return on equity of -3.25%.

Gilat Satellite Networks has a consensus price target of $8.40, signalling upside risk potential of 27.66%. On the other hand Clearfield has an analysts' consensus of $46.00 which suggests that it could grow by 47.53%. Given that Clearfield has higher upside potential than Gilat Satellite Networks, analysts believe Clearfield is more attractive than Gilat Satellite Networks.

Gilat Satellite Networks has a beta of 0.366, which suggesting that the stock is 63.383% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Clearfield has a beta of 1.608, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.843%.

Gilat Satellite Networks has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Clearfield offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Gilat Satellite Networks pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Clearfield pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Gilat Satellite Networks quarterly revenues are $78.1M, which are larger than Clearfield quarterly revenues of $35.5M. Gilat Satellite Networks's net income of $11.8M is higher than Clearfield's net income of -$1.9M. Notably, Gilat Satellite Networks's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.95x while Clearfield's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gilat Satellite Networks is 1.23x versus 2.66x for Clearfield. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Franklin Wireless has a net margin of 15.06% compared to Gilat Satellite Networks's net margin of 1.28%. Gilat Satellite Networks's return on equity of 8.66% beat Franklin Wireless's return on equity of -5.83%.

Gilat Satellite Networks has a consensus price target of $8.40, signalling upside risk potential of 27.66%. On the other hand Franklin Wireless has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 246.32%. Given that Franklin Wireless has higher upside potential than Gilat Satellite Networks, analysts believe Franklin Wireless is more attractive than Gilat Satellite Networks.

Gilat Satellite Networks has a beta of 0.366, which suggesting that the stock is 63.383% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Franklin Wireless has a beta of 0.556, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.361%.

Gilat Satellite Networks has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Franklin Wireless offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Gilat Satellite Networks pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Franklin Wireless pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Gilat Satellite Networks quarterly revenues are $78.1M, which are larger than Franklin Wireless quarterly revenues of $17.8M. Gilat Satellite Networks's net income of $11.8M is higher than Franklin Wireless's net income of $228.7K. Notably, Gilat Satellite Networks's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.95x while Franklin Wireless's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gilat Satellite Networks is 1.23x versus 1.26x for Franklin Wireless. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Netgear has a net margin of 15.06% compared to Gilat Satellite Networks's net margin of -3.72%. Gilat Satellite Networks's return on equity of 8.66% beat Netgear's return on equity of 4.81%.

Gilat Satellite Networks has a consensus price target of $8.40, signalling upside risk potential of 27.66%. On the other hand Netgear has an analysts' consensus of $29.00 which suggests that it could grow by 1.15%. Given that Gilat Satellite Networks has higher upside potential than Netgear, analysts believe Gilat Satellite Networks is more attractive than Netgear.

Gilat Satellite Networks has a beta of 0.366, which suggesting that the stock is 63.383% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Netgear has a beta of 1.092, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.246%.

Gilat Satellite Networks has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Netgear offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Gilat Satellite Networks pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Netgear pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Gilat Satellite Networks quarterly revenues are $78.1M, which are smaller than Netgear quarterly revenues of $162.1M. Gilat Satellite Networks's net income of $11.8M is higher than Netgear's net income of -$6M. Notably, Gilat Satellite Networks's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.95x while Netgear's PE ratio is 34.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gilat Satellite Networks is 1.23x versus 1.26x for Netgear. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Silicom has a net margin of 15.06% compared to Gilat Satellite Networks's net margin of -19.51%. Gilat Satellite Networks's return on equity of 8.66% beat Silicom's return on equity of -9.81%.

Gilat Satellite Networks has a consensus price target of $8.40, signalling upside risk potential of 27.66%. On the other hand Silicom has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 28.95%. Given that Silicom has higher upside potential than Gilat Satellite Networks, analysts believe Silicom is more attractive than Gilat Satellite Networks.

Gilat Satellite Networks has a beta of 0.366, which suggesting that the stock is 63.383% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Silicom has a beta of 0.935, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.49%.

Gilat Satellite Networks has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Silicom offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Gilat Satellite Networks pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Silicom pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Gilat Satellite Networks quarterly revenues are $78.1M, which are larger than Silicom quarterly revenues of $14.4M. Gilat Satellite Networks's net income of $11.8M is higher than Silicom's net income of -$2.8M. Notably, Gilat Satellite Networks's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.95x while Silicom's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gilat Satellite Networks is 1.23x versus 1.57x for Silicom. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.