HWKN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Green Plains has a net margin of 6.64% compared to Hawkins's net margin of -9.41%. Hawkins's return on equity of 19.29% beat Green Plains's return on equity of -9%.

Hawkins has a consensus price target of $139.00, signalling upside risk potential of 14.67%. On the other hand Green Plains has an analysts' consensus of $10.17 which suggests that it could grow by 192.15%. Given that Green Plains has higher upside potential than Hawkins, analysts believe Green Plains is more attractive than Hawkins.

Hawkins has a beta of 0.817, which suggesting that the stock is 18.303% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Green Plains has a beta of 1.205, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.453%.

Hawkins has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.58%. Green Plains offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hawkins pays 17.57% of its earnings as a dividend. Green Plains pays out -6.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Hawkins's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hawkins quarterly revenues are $226.2M, which are smaller than Green Plains quarterly revenues of $584M. Hawkins's net income of $15M is higher than Green Plains's net income of -$54.9M. Notably, Hawkins's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.92x while Green Plains's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hawkins is 2.66x versus 0.09x for Green Plains. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

International Flavors & Fragrances has a net margin of 6.64% compared to Hawkins's net margin of -1.66%. Hawkins's return on equity of 19.29% beat International Flavors & Fragrances's return on equity of 1.69%.

Hawkins has a consensus price target of $139.00, signalling upside risk potential of 14.67%. On the other hand International Flavors & Fragrances has an analysts' consensus of $94.72 which suggests that it could grow by 33.3%. Given that International Flavors & Fragrances has higher upside potential than Hawkins, analysts believe International Flavors & Fragrances is more attractive than Hawkins.

Hawkins has a beta of 0.817, which suggesting that the stock is 18.303% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison International Flavors & Fragrances has a beta of 1.214, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.424%.

Hawkins has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.58%. International Flavors & Fragrances offers a yield of 2.25% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Hawkins pays 17.57% of its earnings as a dividend. International Flavors & Fragrances pays out 211.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Hawkins's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but International Flavors & Fragrances's is not.

Hawkins quarterly revenues are $226.2M, which are smaller than International Flavors & Fragrances quarterly revenues of $2.8B. Hawkins's net income of $15M is higher than International Flavors & Fragrances's net income of -$46M. Notably, Hawkins's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.92x while International Flavors & Fragrances's PE ratio is 75.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hawkins is 2.66x versus 1.59x for International Flavors & Fragrances. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Northern Technologies International has a net margin of 6.64% compared to Hawkins's net margin of 2.28%. Hawkins's return on equity of 19.29% beat Northern Technologies International's return on equity of 5.18%.

Hawkins has a consensus price target of $139.00, signalling upside risk potential of 14.67%. On the other hand Northern Technologies International has an analysts' consensus of $13.00 which suggests that it could grow by 85.19%. Given that Northern Technologies International has higher upside potential than Hawkins, analysts believe Northern Technologies International is more attractive than Hawkins.

Hawkins has a beta of 0.817, which suggesting that the stock is 18.303% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Northern Technologies International has a beta of 0.258, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 74.211%.

Hawkins has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.58%. Northern Technologies International offers a yield of 3.99% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. Hawkins pays 17.57% of its earnings as a dividend. Northern Technologies International pays out 48.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hawkins quarterly revenues are $226.2M, which are larger than Northern Technologies International quarterly revenues of $19.1M. Hawkins's net income of $15M is higher than Northern Technologies International's net income of $434.3K. Notably, Hawkins's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.92x while Northern Technologies International's PE ratio is 18.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hawkins is 2.66x versus 0.82x for Northern Technologies International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Origin Materials has a net margin of 6.64% compared to Hawkins's net margin of -146.63%. Hawkins's return on equity of 19.29% beat Origin Materials's return on equity of -21.81%.

Hawkins has a consensus price target of $139.00, signalling upside risk potential of 14.67%. On the other hand Origin Materials has an analysts' consensus of $0.50 which suggests that it could fall by -15.83%. Given that Hawkins has higher upside potential than Origin Materials, analysts believe Hawkins is more attractive than Origin Materials.

Hawkins has a beta of 0.817, which suggesting that the stock is 18.303% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Origin Materials has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Hawkins has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.58%. Origin Materials offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hawkins pays 17.57% of its earnings as a dividend. Origin Materials pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hawkins's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hawkins quarterly revenues are $226.2M, which are larger than Origin Materials quarterly revenues of $9.2M. Hawkins's net income of $15M is higher than Origin Materials's net income of -$13.5M. Notably, Hawkins's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.92x while Origin Materials's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hawkins is 2.66x versus 2.72x for Origin Materials. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.