NTIC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Friedman Industries has a net margin of 2.28% compared to Northern Technologies International's net margin of -1.23%. Northern Technologies International's return on equity of 5.18% beat Friedman Industries's return on equity of 4.48%.

Northern Technologies International has a consensus price target of $13.00, signalling upside risk potential of 78.08%. On the other hand Friedman Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Northern Technologies International has higher upside potential than Friedman Industries, analysts believe Northern Technologies International is more attractive than Friedman Industries.

Northern Technologies International has a beta of 0.294, which suggesting that the stock is 70.577% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Friedman Industries has a beta of 1.564, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.38%.

Northern Technologies International has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.01%. Friedman Industries offers a yield of 0.99% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Northern Technologies International pays 48.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Friedman Industries pays out 3.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Northern Technologies International quarterly revenues are $19.1M, which are smaller than Friedman Industries quarterly revenues of $94.1M. Northern Technologies International's net income of $434.3K is higher than Friedman Industries's net income of -$1.2M. Notably, Northern Technologies International's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.72x while Friedman Industries's PE ratio is 19.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Northern Technologies International is 0.85x versus 0.25x for Friedman Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Green Plains has a net margin of 2.28% compared to Northern Technologies International's net margin of -9.41%. Northern Technologies International's return on equity of 5.18% beat Green Plains's return on equity of -9%.

Northern Technologies International has a consensus price target of $13.00, signalling upside risk potential of 78.08%. On the other hand Green Plains has an analysts' consensus of $10.31 which suggests that it could grow by 168.91%. Given that Green Plains has higher upside potential than Northern Technologies International, analysts believe Green Plains is more attractive than Northern Technologies International.

Northern Technologies International has a beta of 0.294, which suggesting that the stock is 70.577% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Green Plains has a beta of 1.187, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.693%.

Northern Technologies International has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.01%. Green Plains offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Northern Technologies International pays 48.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Green Plains pays out -6.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Northern Technologies International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Northern Technologies International quarterly revenues are $19.1M, which are smaller than Green Plains quarterly revenues of $584M. Northern Technologies International's net income of $434.3K is higher than Green Plains's net income of -$54.9M. Notably, Northern Technologies International's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.72x while Green Plains's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Northern Technologies International is 0.85x versus 0.10x for Green Plains. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paramount Gold Nevada has a net margin of 2.28% compared to Northern Technologies International's net margin of --. Northern Technologies International's return on equity of 5.18% beat Paramount Gold Nevada's return on equity of --.

Northern Technologies International has a consensus price target of $13.00, signalling upside risk potential of 78.08%. On the other hand Paramount Gold Nevada has an analysts' consensus of $1.40 which suggests that it could grow by 198.19%. Given that Paramount Gold Nevada has higher upside potential than Northern Technologies International, analysts believe Paramount Gold Nevada is more attractive than Northern Technologies International.

Northern Technologies International has a beta of 0.294, which suggesting that the stock is 70.577% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Gold Nevada has a beta of 1.017, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.74%.

Northern Technologies International has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.01%. Paramount Gold Nevada offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Northern Technologies International pays 48.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Gold Nevada pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Northern Technologies International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Northern Technologies International quarterly revenues are $19.1M, which are larger than Paramount Gold Nevada quarterly revenues of --. Northern Technologies International's net income of $434.3K is higher than Paramount Gold Nevada's net income of -$2M. Notably, Northern Technologies International's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.72x while Paramount Gold Nevada's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Northern Technologies International is 0.85x versus -- for Paramount Gold Nevada. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Solitario Resources has a net margin of 2.28% compared to Northern Technologies International's net margin of --. Northern Technologies International's return on equity of 5.18% beat Solitario Resources's return on equity of --.

Northern Technologies International has a consensus price target of $13.00, signalling upside risk potential of 78.08%. On the other hand Solitario Resources has an analysts' consensus of $1.50 which suggests that it could grow by 146.91%. Given that Solitario Resources has higher upside potential than Northern Technologies International, analysts believe Solitario Resources is more attractive than Northern Technologies International.

Northern Technologies International has a beta of 0.294, which suggesting that the stock is 70.577% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solitario Resources has a beta of 0.498, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.16%.

Northern Technologies International has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.01%. Solitario Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Northern Technologies International pays 48.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Solitario Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Northern Technologies International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Northern Technologies International quarterly revenues are $19.1M, which are larger than Solitario Resources quarterly revenues of --. Northern Technologies International's net income of $434.3K is higher than Solitario Resources's net income of -$511K. Notably, Northern Technologies International's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.72x while Solitario Resources's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Northern Technologies International is 0.85x versus -- for Solitario Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.