JKHY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

BM Technologies has a net margin of 19.83% compared to Jack Henry & Associates's net margin of -35.48%. Jack Henry & Associates's return on equity of 22.36% beat BM Technologies's return on equity of -45.36%.

Jack Henry & Associates has a consensus price target of $192.93, signalling upside risk potential of 11.07%. On the other hand BM Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 9.98%. Given that Jack Henry & Associates has higher upside potential than BM Technologies, analysts believe Jack Henry & Associates is more attractive than BM Technologies.

Jack Henry & Associates has a beta of 0.611, which suggesting that the stock is 38.923% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BM Technologies has a beta of 0.174, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 82.585%.

Jack Henry & Associates has a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.27%. BM Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Jack Henry & Associates pays 40.83% of its earnings as a dividend. BM Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Jack Henry & Associates's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Jack Henry & Associates quarterly revenues are $601M, which are larger than BM Technologies quarterly revenues of $14.1M. Jack Henry & Associates's net income of $119.2M is higher than BM Technologies's net income of -$5M. Notably, Jack Henry & Associates's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.81x while BM Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Jack Henry & Associates is 5.65x versus 1.00x for BM Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Castellum has a net margin of 19.83% compared to Jack Henry & Associates's net margin of -11.03%. Jack Henry & Associates's return on equity of 22.36% beat Castellum's return on equity of -74.03%.

Jack Henry & Associates has a consensus price target of $192.93, signalling upside risk potential of 11.07%. On the other hand Castellum has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -31.14%. Given that Jack Henry & Associates has higher upside potential than Castellum, analysts believe Jack Henry & Associates is more attractive than Castellum.

Jack Henry & Associates has a beta of 0.611, which suggesting that the stock is 38.923% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Castellum has a beta of -2.951, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 395.117%.

Jack Henry & Associates has a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.27%. Castellum offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Jack Henry & Associates pays 40.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Castellum pays out -0.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Jack Henry & Associates's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Jack Henry & Associates quarterly revenues are $601M, which are larger than Castellum quarterly revenues of $11.6M. Jack Henry & Associates's net income of $119.2M is higher than Castellum's net income of -$1.3M. Notably, Jack Henry & Associates's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.81x while Castellum's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Jack Henry & Associates is 5.65x versus 2.00x for Castellum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Clearwater Analytics Holdings has a net margin of 19.83% compared to Jack Henry & Associates's net margin of 3.13%. Jack Henry & Associates's return on equity of 22.36% beat Clearwater Analytics Holdings's return on equity of 0.16%.

Jack Henry & Associates has a consensus price target of $192.93, signalling upside risk potential of 11.07%. On the other hand Clearwater Analytics Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $33.00 which suggests that it could grow by 18.45%. Given that Clearwater Analytics Holdings has higher upside potential than Jack Henry & Associates, analysts believe Clearwater Analytics Holdings is more attractive than Jack Henry & Associates.

Jack Henry & Associates has a beta of 0.611, which suggesting that the stock is 38.923% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Clearwater Analytics Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Jack Henry & Associates has a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.27%. Clearwater Analytics Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Jack Henry & Associates pays 40.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Clearwater Analytics Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Jack Henry & Associates's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Jack Henry & Associates quarterly revenues are $601M, which are larger than Clearwater Analytics Holdings quarterly revenues of $115.8M. Jack Henry & Associates's net income of $119.2M is higher than Clearwater Analytics Holdings's net income of $3.6M. Notably, Jack Henry & Associates's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.81x while Clearwater Analytics Holdings's PE ratio is 3,469.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Jack Henry & Associates is 5.65x versus 14.94x for Clearwater Analytics Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marqeta has a net margin of 19.83% compared to Jack Henry & Associates's net margin of -22.38%. Jack Henry & Associates's return on equity of 22.36% beat Marqeta's return on equity of 1.17%.

Jack Henry & Associates has a consensus price target of $192.93, signalling upside risk potential of 11.07%. On the other hand Marqeta has an analysts' consensus of $5.31 which suggests that it could grow by 37.48%. Given that Marqeta has higher upside potential than Jack Henry & Associates, analysts believe Marqeta is more attractive than Jack Henry & Associates.

Jack Henry & Associates has a beta of 0.611, which suggesting that the stock is 38.923% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marqeta has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Jack Henry & Associates has a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.27%. Marqeta offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Jack Henry & Associates pays 40.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Marqeta pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Jack Henry & Associates's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Jack Henry & Associates quarterly revenues are $601M, which are larger than Marqeta quarterly revenues of $128M. Jack Henry & Associates's net income of $119.2M is higher than Marqeta's net income of -$28.6M. Notably, Jack Henry & Associates's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.81x while Marqeta's PE ratio is 193.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Jack Henry & Associates is 5.65x versus 4.08x for Marqeta. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.