CWAN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

EPAM Systems has a net margin of 3.13% compared to Clearwater Analytics Holdings's net margin of 11.68%. Clearwater Analytics Holdings's return on equity of 0.16% beat EPAM Systems's return on equity of 13.05%.

Clearwater Analytics Holdings has a consensus price target of $33.00, signalling upside risk potential of 21.32%. On the other hand EPAM Systems has an analysts' consensus of $258.74 which suggests that it could grow by 12.01%. Given that Clearwater Analytics Holdings has higher upside potential than EPAM Systems, analysts believe Clearwater Analytics Holdings is more attractive than EPAM Systems.

Clearwater Analytics Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EPAM Systems has a beta of 1.499, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.88%.

Clearwater Analytics Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. EPAM Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Clearwater Analytics Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. EPAM Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Clearwater Analytics Holdings quarterly revenues are $115.8M, which are smaller than EPAM Systems quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Clearwater Analytics Holdings's net income of $3.6M is lower than EPAM Systems's net income of $136.3M. Notably, Clearwater Analytics Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 3,386.88x while EPAM Systems's PE ratio is 30.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Clearwater Analytics Holdings is 14.59x versus 2.91x for EPAM Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

GitLab has a net margin of 3.13% compared to Clearwater Analytics Holdings's net margin of 15.08%. Clearwater Analytics Holdings's return on equity of 0.16% beat GitLab's return on equity of -7.4%.

Clearwater Analytics Holdings has a consensus price target of $33.00, signalling upside risk potential of 21.32%. On the other hand GitLab has an analysts' consensus of $79.36 which suggests that it could grow by 30.1%. Given that GitLab has higher upside potential than Clearwater Analytics Holdings, analysts believe GitLab is more attractive than Clearwater Analytics Holdings.

Clearwater Analytics Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GitLab has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Clearwater Analytics Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. GitLab offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Clearwater Analytics Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. GitLab pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Clearwater Analytics Holdings quarterly revenues are $115.8M, which are smaller than GitLab quarterly revenues of $196M. Clearwater Analytics Holdings's net income of $3.6M is lower than GitLab's net income of $29.6M. Notably, Clearwater Analytics Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 3,386.88x while GitLab's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Clearwater Analytics Holdings is 14.59x versus 14.03x for GitLab. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Jack Henry & Associates has a net margin of 3.13% compared to Clearwater Analytics Holdings's net margin of 19.83%. Clearwater Analytics Holdings's return on equity of 0.16% beat Jack Henry & Associates's return on equity of 22.36%.

Clearwater Analytics Holdings has a consensus price target of $33.00, signalling upside risk potential of 21.32%. On the other hand Jack Henry & Associates has an analysts' consensus of $192.93 which suggests that it could grow by 13.74%. Given that Clearwater Analytics Holdings has higher upside potential than Jack Henry & Associates, analysts believe Clearwater Analytics Holdings is more attractive than Jack Henry & Associates.

Clearwater Analytics Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Jack Henry & Associates has a beta of 0.611, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.923%.

Clearwater Analytics Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Jack Henry & Associates offers a yield of 1.3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share. Clearwater Analytics Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Jack Henry & Associates pays out 40.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Jack Henry & Associates's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Clearwater Analytics Holdings quarterly revenues are $115.8M, which are smaller than Jack Henry & Associates quarterly revenues of $601M. Clearwater Analytics Holdings's net income of $3.6M is lower than Jack Henry & Associates's net income of $119.2M. Notably, Clearwater Analytics Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 3,386.88x while Jack Henry & Associates's PE ratio is 31.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Clearwater Analytics Holdings is 14.59x versus 5.52x for Jack Henry & Associates. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marqeta has a net margin of 3.13% compared to Clearwater Analytics Holdings's net margin of -22.38%. Clearwater Analytics Holdings's return on equity of 0.16% beat Marqeta's return on equity of 1.17%.

Clearwater Analytics Holdings has a consensus price target of $33.00, signalling upside risk potential of 21.32%. On the other hand Marqeta has an analysts' consensus of $5.24 which suggests that it could grow by 36.46%. Given that Marqeta has higher upside potential than Clearwater Analytics Holdings, analysts believe Marqeta is more attractive than Clearwater Analytics Holdings.

Clearwater Analytics Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marqeta has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Clearwater Analytics Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Marqeta offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Clearwater Analytics Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Marqeta pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Clearwater Analytics Holdings quarterly revenues are $115.8M, which are smaller than Marqeta quarterly revenues of $128M. Clearwater Analytics Holdings's net income of $3.6M is higher than Marqeta's net income of -$28.6M. Notably, Clearwater Analytics Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 3,386.88x while Marqeta's PE ratio is 192.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Clearwater Analytics Holdings is 14.59x versus 4.06x for Marqeta. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.