LAMR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Innovative Industrial Properties has a net margin of 26.14% compared to Lamar Advertising's net margin of 52.55%. Lamar Advertising's return on equity of 42.69% beat Innovative Industrial Properties's return on equity of 8.37%.

Lamar Advertising has a consensus price target of $133.95, signalling upside risk potential of 8.91%. On the other hand Innovative Industrial Properties has an analysts' consensus of $126.67 which suggests that it could grow by 71.96%. Given that Innovative Industrial Properties has higher upside potential than Lamar Advertising, analysts believe Innovative Industrial Properties is more attractive than Lamar Advertising.

Lamar Advertising has a beta of 1.503, which suggesting that the stock is 50.271% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Innovative Industrial Properties has a beta of 1.305, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.455%.

Lamar Advertising has a quarterly dividend of $1.65 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.39%. Innovative Industrial Properties offers a yield of 10.1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.90 per share. Lamar Advertising pays 103% of its earnings as a dividend. Innovative Industrial Properties pays out 123.24% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lamar Advertising quarterly revenues are $564.1M, which are larger than Innovative Industrial Properties quarterly revenues of $76.5M. Lamar Advertising's net income of $147.5M is higher than Innovative Industrial Properties's net income of $40.2M. Notably, Lamar Advertising's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.60x while Innovative Industrial Properties's PE ratio is 13.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lamar Advertising is 5.77x versus 6.75x for Innovative Industrial Properties. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Invitation Homes has a net margin of 26.14% compared to Lamar Advertising's net margin of 14.43%. Lamar Advertising's return on equity of 42.69% beat Invitation Homes's return on equity of 4.35%.

Lamar Advertising has a consensus price target of $133.95, signalling upside risk potential of 8.91%. On the other hand Invitation Homes has an analysts' consensus of $37.77 which suggests that it could grow by 17.53%. Given that Invitation Homes has higher upside potential than Lamar Advertising, analysts believe Invitation Homes is more attractive than Lamar Advertising.

Lamar Advertising has a beta of 1.503, which suggesting that the stock is 50.271% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invitation Homes has a beta of 1.035, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.488%.

Lamar Advertising has a quarterly dividend of $1.65 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.39%. Invitation Homes offers a yield of 4.29% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Lamar Advertising pays 103% of its earnings as a dividend. Invitation Homes pays out 122.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lamar Advertising quarterly revenues are $564.1M, which are smaller than Invitation Homes quarterly revenues of $660.3M. Lamar Advertising's net income of $147.5M is higher than Invitation Homes's net income of $95.3M. Notably, Lamar Advertising's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.60x while Invitation Homes's PE ratio is 45.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lamar Advertising is 5.77x versus 7.63x for Invitation Homes. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Outfront Media has a net margin of 26.14% compared to Lamar Advertising's net margin of 7.66%. Lamar Advertising's return on equity of 42.69% beat Outfront Media's return on equity of 32.95%.

Lamar Advertising has a consensus price target of $133.95, signalling upside risk potential of 8.91%. On the other hand Outfront Media has an analysts' consensus of $20.00 which suggests that it could grow by 10.01%. Given that Outfront Media has higher upside potential than Lamar Advertising, analysts believe Outfront Media is more attractive than Lamar Advertising.

Lamar Advertising has a beta of 1.503, which suggesting that the stock is 50.271% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Outfront Media has a beta of 1.976, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 97.633%.

Lamar Advertising has a quarterly dividend of $1.65 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.39%. Outfront Media offers a yield of 6.6% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share. Lamar Advertising pays 103% of its earnings as a dividend. Outfront Media pays out -48.1% of its earnings as a dividend.

Lamar Advertising quarterly revenues are $564.1M, which are larger than Outfront Media quarterly revenues of $451.9M. Lamar Advertising's net income of $147.5M is higher than Outfront Media's net income of $34.6M. Notably, Lamar Advertising's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.60x while Outfront Media's PE ratio is 13.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lamar Advertising is 5.77x versus 1.66x for Outfront Media. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PotlatchDeltic has a net margin of 26.14% compared to Lamar Advertising's net margin of 1.3%. Lamar Advertising's return on equity of 42.69% beat PotlatchDeltic's return on equity of 0.77%.

Lamar Advertising has a consensus price target of $133.95, signalling upside risk potential of 8.91%. On the other hand PotlatchDeltic has an analysts' consensus of $51.71 which suggests that it could grow by 31.85%. Given that PotlatchDeltic has higher upside potential than Lamar Advertising, analysts believe PotlatchDeltic is more attractive than Lamar Advertising.

Lamar Advertising has a beta of 1.503, which suggesting that the stock is 50.271% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PotlatchDeltic has a beta of 1.148, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.835%.

Lamar Advertising has a quarterly dividend of $1.65 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.39%. PotlatchDeltic offers a yield of 4.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. Lamar Advertising pays 103% of its earnings as a dividend. PotlatchDeltic pays out 231.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lamar Advertising quarterly revenues are $564.1M, which are larger than PotlatchDeltic quarterly revenues of $255.1M. Lamar Advertising's net income of $147.5M is higher than PotlatchDeltic's net income of $3.3M. Notably, Lamar Advertising's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.60x while PotlatchDeltic's PE ratio is 189.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lamar Advertising is 5.77x versus 2.92x for PotlatchDeltic. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.