LAMR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Innovative Industrial Properties has a net margin of -0.21% compared to Lamar Advertising's net margin of 52.15%. Lamar Advertising's return on equity of 30.88% beat Innovative Industrial Properties's return on equity of 8.3%.

Lamar Advertising has a consensus price target of $132.60, signalling upside risk potential of 16.64%. On the other hand Innovative Industrial Properties has an analysts' consensus of $71.00 which suggests that it could grow by 37.07%. Given that Innovative Industrial Properties has higher upside potential than Lamar Advertising, analysts believe Innovative Industrial Properties is more attractive than Lamar Advertising.

Lamar Advertising has a beta of 1.339, which suggesting that the stock is 33.853% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Innovative Industrial Properties has a beta of 1.590, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.015%.

Lamar Advertising has a quarterly dividend of $1.55 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.97%. Innovative Industrial Properties offers a yield of 14.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.90 per share. Lamar Advertising pays 160.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Innovative Industrial Properties pays out 132.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lamar Advertising quarterly revenues are $579.6M, which are larger than Innovative Industrial Properties quarterly revenues of $76.7M. Lamar Advertising's net income of -$1.2M is lower than Innovative Industrial Properties's net income of $40M. Notably, Lamar Advertising's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.20x while Innovative Industrial Properties's PE ratio is 9.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lamar Advertising is 5.28x versus 4.79x for Innovative Industrial Properties. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Invitation Homes has a net margin of -0.21% compared to Lamar Advertising's net margin of 21.71%. Lamar Advertising's return on equity of 30.88% beat Invitation Homes's return on equity of 4.52%.

Lamar Advertising has a consensus price target of $132.60, signalling upside risk potential of 16.64%. On the other hand Invitation Homes has an analysts' consensus of $36.86 which suggests that it could grow by 14.24%. Given that Lamar Advertising has higher upside potential than Invitation Homes, analysts believe Lamar Advertising is more attractive than Invitation Homes.

Lamar Advertising has a beta of 1.339, which suggesting that the stock is 33.853% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invitation Homes has a beta of 0.863, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.722%.

Lamar Advertising has a quarterly dividend of $1.55 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.97%. Invitation Homes offers a yield of 3.53% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. Lamar Advertising pays 160.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Invitation Homes pays out 151.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lamar Advertising quarterly revenues are $579.6M, which are smaller than Invitation Homes quarterly revenues of $659.1M. Lamar Advertising's net income of -$1.2M is lower than Invitation Homes's net income of $143.1M. Notably, Lamar Advertising's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.20x while Invitation Homes's PE ratio is 44.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lamar Advertising is 5.28x versus 7.56x for Invitation Homes. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Iron Mountain has a net margin of -0.21% compared to Lamar Advertising's net margin of 6.57%. Lamar Advertising's return on equity of 30.88% beat Iron Mountain's return on equity of 236.21%.

Lamar Advertising has a consensus price target of $132.60, signalling upside risk potential of 16.64%. On the other hand Iron Mountain has an analysts' consensus of $113.78 which suggests that it could grow by 34.66%. Given that Iron Mountain has higher upside potential than Lamar Advertising, analysts believe Iron Mountain is more attractive than Lamar Advertising.

Lamar Advertising has a beta of 1.339, which suggesting that the stock is 33.853% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Iron Mountain has a beta of 0.978, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.188%.

Lamar Advertising has a quarterly dividend of $1.55 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.97%. Iron Mountain offers a yield of 3.39% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.79 per share. Lamar Advertising pays 160.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Iron Mountain pays out 438.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lamar Advertising quarterly revenues are $579.6M, which are smaller than Iron Mountain quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Lamar Advertising's net income of -$1.2M is lower than Iron Mountain's net income of $103.9M. Notably, Lamar Advertising's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.20x while Iron Mountain's PE ratio is 138.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lamar Advertising is 5.28x versus 4.06x for Iron Mountain. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PotlatchDeltic has a net margin of -0.21% compared to Lamar Advertising's net margin of 2.01%. Lamar Advertising's return on equity of 30.88% beat PotlatchDeltic's return on equity of 1.04%.

Lamar Advertising has a consensus price target of $132.60, signalling upside risk potential of 16.64%. On the other hand PotlatchDeltic has an analysts' consensus of $50.38 which suggests that it could grow by 24.78%. Given that PotlatchDeltic has higher upside potential than Lamar Advertising, analysts believe PotlatchDeltic is more attractive than Lamar Advertising.

Lamar Advertising has a beta of 1.339, which suggesting that the stock is 33.853% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PotlatchDeltic has a beta of 1.125, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.539%.

Lamar Advertising has a quarterly dividend of $1.55 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.97%. PotlatchDeltic offers a yield of 4.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. Lamar Advertising pays 160.06% of its earnings as a dividend. PotlatchDeltic pays out 650.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lamar Advertising quarterly revenues are $579.6M, which are larger than PotlatchDeltic quarterly revenues of $258.1M. Lamar Advertising's net income of -$1.2M is lower than PotlatchDeltic's net income of $5.2M. Notably, Lamar Advertising's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.20x while PotlatchDeltic's PE ratio is 146.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lamar Advertising is 5.28x versus 3.02x for PotlatchDeltic. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.