LNW Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Century Casinos has a net margin of 7.83% compared to Light & Wonder's net margin of -5.22%. Light & Wonder's return on equity of 33.6% beat Century Casinos's return on equity of -39.21%.

Light & Wonder has a consensus price target of $109.94, signalling upside risk potential of 27.8%. On the other hand Century Casinos has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 81.96%. Given that Century Casinos has higher upside potential than Light & Wonder, analysts believe Century Casinos is more attractive than Light & Wonder.

Light & Wonder has a beta of 1.711, which suggesting that the stock is 71.06% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Century Casinos has a beta of 2.596, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 159.595%.

Light & Wonder has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Century Casinos offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Light & Wonder pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Century Casinos pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Light & Wonder quarterly revenues are $817M, which are larger than Century Casinos quarterly revenues of $155.7M. Light & Wonder's net income of $64M is higher than Century Casinos's net income of -$8.1M. Notably, Light & Wonder's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.80x while Century Casinos's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Light & Wonder is 2.50x versus 0.17x for Century Casinos. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

DraftKings has a net margin of 7.83% compared to Light & Wonder's net margin of -26.81%. Light & Wonder's return on equity of 33.6% beat DraftKings's return on equity of -43.02%.

Light & Wonder has a consensus price target of $109.94, signalling upside risk potential of 27.8%. On the other hand DraftKings has an analysts' consensus of $51.25 which suggests that it could grow by 35.15%. Given that DraftKings has higher upside potential than Light & Wonder, analysts believe DraftKings is more attractive than Light & Wonder.

Light & Wonder has a beta of 1.711, which suggesting that the stock is 71.06% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DraftKings has a beta of 1.868, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 86.771%.

Light & Wonder has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. DraftKings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Light & Wonder pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. DraftKings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Light & Wonder quarterly revenues are $817M, which are smaller than DraftKings quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Light & Wonder's net income of $64M is higher than DraftKings's net income of -$293.7M. Notably, Light & Wonder's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.80x while DraftKings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Light & Wonder is 2.50x versus 4.01x for DraftKings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Inspired Entertainment has a net margin of 7.83% compared to Light & Wonder's net margin of 4.36%. Light & Wonder's return on equity of 33.6% beat Inspired Entertainment's return on equity of --.

Light & Wonder has a consensus price target of $109.94, signalling upside risk potential of 27.8%. On the other hand Inspired Entertainment has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 68.54%. Given that Inspired Entertainment has higher upside potential than Light & Wonder, analysts believe Inspired Entertainment is more attractive than Light & Wonder.

Light & Wonder has a beta of 1.711, which suggesting that the stock is 71.06% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Inspired Entertainment has a beta of 1.390, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.031%.

Light & Wonder has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Inspired Entertainment offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Light & Wonder pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Inspired Entertainment pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Light & Wonder quarterly revenues are $817M, which are larger than Inspired Entertainment quarterly revenues of $78M. Light & Wonder's net income of $64M is higher than Inspired Entertainment's net income of $3.4M. Notably, Light & Wonder's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.80x while Inspired Entertainment's PE ratio is 80.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Light & Wonder is 2.50x versus 0.87x for Inspired Entertainment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

High Roller Technologies has a net margin of 7.83% compared to Light & Wonder's net margin of -6.67%. Light & Wonder's return on equity of 33.6% beat High Roller Technologies's return on equity of -488.01%.

Light & Wonder has a consensus price target of $109.94, signalling upside risk potential of 27.8%. On the other hand High Roller Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Light & Wonder has higher upside potential than High Roller Technologies, analysts believe Light & Wonder is more attractive than High Roller Technologies.

Light & Wonder has a beta of 1.711, which suggesting that the stock is 71.06% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison High Roller Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Light & Wonder has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. High Roller Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Light & Wonder pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. High Roller Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Light & Wonder quarterly revenues are $817M, which are larger than High Roller Technologies quarterly revenues of $7.5M. Light & Wonder's net income of $64M is higher than High Roller Technologies's net income of -$501K. Notably, Light & Wonder's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.80x while High Roller Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Light & Wonder is 2.50x versus 1.33x for High Roller Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.