MFIC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Gladstone Investment has a net margin of 89.54% compared to MidCap Financial Investment's net margin of 99.99%. MidCap Financial Investment's return on equity of 9.95% beat Gladstone Investment's return on equity of 8.06%.

MidCap Financial Investment has a consensus price target of $14.91, signalling upside risk potential of 13.36%. On the other hand Gladstone Investment has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 4.17%. Given that MidCap Financial Investment has higher upside potential than Gladstone Investment, analysts believe MidCap Financial Investment is more attractive than Gladstone Investment.

MidCap Financial Investment has a beta of 1.490, which suggesting that the stock is 48.968% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gladstone Investment has a beta of 1.306, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.622%.

MidCap Financial Investment has a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.56%. Gladstone Investment offers a yield of 7.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. MidCap Financial Investment pays 103.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Gladstone Investment pays out 89.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Gladstone Investment's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but MidCap Financial Investment's is not.

MidCap Financial Investment quarterly revenues are $29.8M, which are larger than Gladstone Investment quarterly revenues of $15.5M. MidCap Financial Investment's net income of $26.7M is higher than Gladstone Investment's net income of $15.5M. Notably, MidCap Financial Investment's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.43x while Gladstone Investment's PE ratio is 12.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MidCap Financial Investment is 7.07x versus 13.01x for Gladstone Investment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Golub Capital BDC has a net margin of 89.54% compared to MidCap Financial Investment's net margin of 98.44%. MidCap Financial Investment's return on equity of 9.95% beat Golub Capital BDC's return on equity of 8.68%.

MidCap Financial Investment has a consensus price target of $14.91, signalling upside risk potential of 13.36%. On the other hand Golub Capital BDC has an analysts' consensus of $17.00 which suggests that it could grow by 8.41%. Given that MidCap Financial Investment has higher upside potential than Golub Capital BDC, analysts believe MidCap Financial Investment is more attractive than Golub Capital BDC.

MidCap Financial Investment has a beta of 1.490, which suggesting that the stock is 48.968% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Golub Capital BDC has a beta of 0.628, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.151%.

MidCap Financial Investment has a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.56%. Golub Capital BDC offers a yield of 11.01% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share. MidCap Financial Investment pays 103.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Golub Capital BDC pays out 123.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MidCap Financial Investment quarterly revenues are $29.8M, which are smaller than Golub Capital BDC quarterly revenues of $94.2M. MidCap Financial Investment's net income of $26.7M is lower than Golub Capital BDC's net income of $95.2M. Notably, MidCap Financial Investment's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.43x while Golub Capital BDC's PE ratio is 10.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MidCap Financial Investment is 7.07x versus 11.07x for Golub Capital BDC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gladstone Capital has a net margin of 89.54% compared to MidCap Financial Investment's net margin of 96.47%. MidCap Financial Investment's return on equity of 9.95% beat Gladstone Capital's return on equity of 21.7%.

MidCap Financial Investment has a consensus price target of $14.91, signalling upside risk potential of 13.36%. On the other hand Gladstone Capital has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -15.37%. Given that MidCap Financial Investment has higher upside potential than Gladstone Capital, analysts believe MidCap Financial Investment is more attractive than Gladstone Capital.

MidCap Financial Investment has a beta of 1.490, which suggesting that the stock is 48.968% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gladstone Capital has a beta of 1.271, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.098%.

MidCap Financial Investment has a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.56%. Gladstone Capital offers a yield of 6.88% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. MidCap Financial Investment pays 103.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Gladstone Capital pays out 45.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Gladstone Capital's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but MidCap Financial Investment's is not.

MidCap Financial Investment quarterly revenues are $29.8M, which are smaller than Gladstone Capital quarterly revenues of $33.1M. MidCap Financial Investment's net income of $26.7M is lower than Gladstone Capital's net income of $31.9M. Notably, MidCap Financial Investment's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.43x while Gladstone Capital's PE ratio is 4.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MidCap Financial Investment is 7.07x versus 4.78x for Gladstone Capital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oaktree Specialty Lending has a net margin of 89.54% compared to MidCap Financial Investment's net margin of -121.48%. MidCap Financial Investment's return on equity of 9.95% beat Oaktree Specialty Lending's return on equity of 3.84%.

MidCap Financial Investment has a consensus price target of $14.91, signalling upside risk potential of 13.36%. On the other hand Oaktree Specialty Lending has an analysts' consensus of $17.70 which suggests that it could grow by 12.48%. Given that MidCap Financial Investment has higher upside potential than Oaktree Specialty Lending, analysts believe MidCap Financial Investment is more attractive than Oaktree Specialty Lending.

MidCap Financial Investment has a beta of 1.490, which suggesting that the stock is 48.968% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oaktree Specialty Lending has a beta of 1.076, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.634%.

MidCap Financial Investment has a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.56%. Oaktree Specialty Lending offers a yield of 14.63% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share. MidCap Financial Investment pays 103.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Oaktree Specialty Lending pays out 305.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MidCap Financial Investment quarterly revenues are $29.8M, which are smaller than Oaktree Specialty Lending quarterly revenues of $36.5M. MidCap Financial Investment's net income of $26.7M is lower than Oaktree Specialty Lending's net income of $36.9M. Notably, MidCap Financial Investment's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.43x while Oaktree Specialty Lending's PE ratio is 20.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MidCap Financial Investment is 7.07x versus 21.00x for Oaktree Specialty Lending. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.