OCSL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Gladstone Investment has a net margin of 90.2% compared to Oaktree Specialty Lending's net margin of 99.99%. Oaktree Specialty Lending's return on equity of 0.61% beat Gladstone Investment's return on equity of 14.72%.

Oaktree Specialty Lending has a consensus price target of $14.10, signalling upside risk potential of 3.22%. On the other hand Gladstone Investment has an analysts' consensus of $13.88 which suggests that it could grow by 1.97%. Given that Oaktree Specialty Lending has higher upside potential than Gladstone Investment, analysts believe Oaktree Specialty Lending is more attractive than Gladstone Investment.

Oaktree Specialty Lending has a beta of 0.744, which suggesting that the stock is 25.64% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gladstone Investment has a beta of 0.863, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.718%.

Oaktree Specialty Lending has a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share corresponding to a yield of 15.52%. Gladstone Investment offers a yield of 6.99% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Oaktree Specialty Lending pays 305.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Gladstone Investment pays out 89.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Gladstone Investment's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Oaktree Specialty Lending's is not.

Oaktree Specialty Lending quarterly revenues are -$40.2M, which are smaller than Gladstone Investment quarterly revenues of $35.7M. Oaktree Specialty Lending's net income of -$36.2M is lower than Gladstone Investment's net income of $38.5M. Notably, Oaktree Specialty Lending's price-to-earnings ratio is 105.08x while Gladstone Investment's PE ratio is 7.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oaktree Specialty Lending is 22.13x versus 7.52x for Gladstone Investment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Golub Capital BDC has a net margin of 90.2% compared to Oaktree Specialty Lending's net margin of 91.13%. Oaktree Specialty Lending's return on equity of 0.61% beat Golub Capital BDC's return on equity of 7.87%.

Oaktree Specialty Lending has a consensus price target of $14.10, signalling upside risk potential of 3.22%. On the other hand Golub Capital BDC has an analysts' consensus of $15.50 which suggests that it could grow by 7.86%. Given that Golub Capital BDC has higher upside potential than Oaktree Specialty Lending, analysts believe Golub Capital BDC is more attractive than Oaktree Specialty Lending.

Oaktree Specialty Lending has a beta of 0.744, which suggesting that the stock is 25.64% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Golub Capital BDC has a beta of 0.552, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.846%.

Oaktree Specialty Lending has a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share corresponding to a yield of 15.52%. Golub Capital BDC offers a yield of 11.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share. Oaktree Specialty Lending pays 305.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Golub Capital BDC pays out 123.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Oaktree Specialty Lending quarterly revenues are -$40.2M, which are smaller than Golub Capital BDC quarterly revenues of $86.7M. Oaktree Specialty Lending's net income of -$36.2M is lower than Golub Capital BDC's net income of $79M. Notably, Oaktree Specialty Lending's price-to-earnings ratio is 105.08x while Golub Capital BDC's PE ratio is 12.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oaktree Specialty Lending is 22.13x versus 11.90x for Golub Capital BDC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gladstone Capital has a net margin of 90.2% compared to Oaktree Specialty Lending's net margin of 96.47%. Oaktree Specialty Lending's return on equity of 0.61% beat Gladstone Capital's return on equity of 22.5%.

Oaktree Specialty Lending has a consensus price target of $14.10, signalling upside risk potential of 3.22%. On the other hand Gladstone Capital has an analysts' consensus of $26.25 which suggests that it could grow by 5.3%. Given that Gladstone Capital has higher upside potential than Oaktree Specialty Lending, analysts believe Gladstone Capital is more attractive than Oaktree Specialty Lending.

Oaktree Specialty Lending has a beta of 0.744, which suggesting that the stock is 25.64% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gladstone Capital has a beta of 1.004, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.35799999999999%.

Oaktree Specialty Lending has a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share corresponding to a yield of 15.52%. Gladstone Capital offers a yield of 7.94% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Oaktree Specialty Lending pays 305.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Gladstone Capital pays out 45.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Gladstone Capital's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Oaktree Specialty Lending's is not.

Oaktree Specialty Lending quarterly revenues are -$40.2M, which are smaller than Gladstone Capital quarterly revenues of $26.9M. Oaktree Specialty Lending's net income of -$36.2M is lower than Gladstone Capital's net income of $27.1M. Notably, Oaktree Specialty Lending's price-to-earnings ratio is 105.08x while Gladstone Capital's PE ratio is 4.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oaktree Specialty Lending is 22.13x versus 4.54x for Gladstone Capital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MidCap Financial Investment has a net margin of 90.2% compared to Oaktree Specialty Lending's net margin of 90.38%. Oaktree Specialty Lending's return on equity of 0.61% beat MidCap Financial Investment's return on equity of 8.47%.

Oaktree Specialty Lending has a consensus price target of $14.10, signalling upside risk potential of 3.22%. On the other hand MidCap Financial Investment has an analysts' consensus of $14.03 which suggests that it could grow by 15.48%. Given that MidCap Financial Investment has higher upside potential than Oaktree Specialty Lending, analysts believe MidCap Financial Investment is more attractive than Oaktree Specialty Lending.

Oaktree Specialty Lending has a beta of 0.744, which suggesting that the stock is 25.64% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MidCap Financial Investment has a beta of 1.004, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.40500000000001%.

Oaktree Specialty Lending has a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share corresponding to a yield of 15.52%. MidCap Financial Investment offers a yield of 12.51% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. Oaktree Specialty Lending pays 305.35% of its earnings as a dividend. MidCap Financial Investment pays out 141.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Oaktree Specialty Lending quarterly revenues are -$40.2M, which are smaller than MidCap Financial Investment quarterly revenues of $26.6M. Oaktree Specialty Lending's net income of -$36.2M is lower than MidCap Financial Investment's net income of $24.1M. Notably, Oaktree Specialty Lending's price-to-earnings ratio is 105.08x while MidCap Financial Investment's PE ratio is 9.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oaktree Specialty Lending is 22.13x versus 8.58x for MidCap Financial Investment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.