MRCY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CAM Group has a net margin of -8.57% compared to Mercury Systems's net margin of --. Mercury Systems's return on equity of -7.95% beat CAM Group's return on equity of --.

Mercury Systems has a consensus price target of $34.25, signalling downside risk potential of -18.26%. On the other hand CAM Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Mercury Systems has higher upside potential than CAM Group, analysts believe Mercury Systems is more attractive than CAM Group.

Mercury Systems has a beta of 0.780, which suggesting that the stock is 22.001% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CAM Group has a beta of -1.114, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 211.378%.

Mercury Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CAM Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mercury Systems pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CAM Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Mercury Systems quarterly revenues are $204.4M, which are larger than CAM Group quarterly revenues of --. Mercury Systems's net income of -$17.5M is higher than CAM Group's net income of --. Notably, Mercury Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CAM Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mercury Systems is 2.83x versus -- for CAM Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Huntington Ingalls Industries has a net margin of -8.57% compared to Mercury Systems's net margin of 3.67%. Mercury Systems's return on equity of -7.95% beat Huntington Ingalls Industries's return on equity of 17.24%.

Mercury Systems has a consensus price target of $34.25, signalling downside risk potential of -18.26%. On the other hand Huntington Ingalls Industries has an analysts' consensus of $228.51 which suggests that it could grow by 20.26%. Given that Huntington Ingalls Industries has higher upside potential than Mercury Systems, analysts believe Huntington Ingalls Industries is more attractive than Mercury Systems.

Mercury Systems has a beta of 0.780, which suggesting that the stock is 22.001% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Huntington Ingalls Industries has a beta of 0.560, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.97%.

Mercury Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Huntington Ingalls Industries offers a yield of 2.76% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.35 per share. Mercury Systems pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Huntington Ingalls Industries pays out 29.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Huntington Ingalls Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mercury Systems quarterly revenues are $204.4M, which are smaller than Huntington Ingalls Industries quarterly revenues of $2.7B. Mercury Systems's net income of -$17.5M is lower than Huntington Ingalls Industries's net income of $101M. Notably, Mercury Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Huntington Ingalls Industries's PE ratio is 10.73x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mercury Systems is 2.83x versus 0.64x for Huntington Ingalls Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kratos Defense & Security Solutions has a net margin of -8.57% compared to Mercury Systems's net margin of 1.16%. Mercury Systems's return on equity of -7.95% beat Kratos Defense & Security Solutions's return on equity of 1.24%.

Mercury Systems has a consensus price target of $34.25, signalling downside risk potential of -18.26%. On the other hand Kratos Defense & Security Solutions has an analysts' consensus of $28.73 which suggests that it could fall by -2.19%. Given that Mercury Systems has more downside risk than Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, analysts believe Kratos Defense & Security Solutions is more attractive than Mercury Systems.

Mercury Systems has a beta of 0.780, which suggesting that the stock is 22.001% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kratos Defense & Security Solutions has a beta of 1.074, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.358%.

Mercury Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kratos Defense & Security Solutions offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mercury Systems pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kratos Defense & Security Solutions pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Mercury Systems quarterly revenues are $204.4M, which are smaller than Kratos Defense & Security Solutions quarterly revenues of $275.9M. Mercury Systems's net income of -$17.5M is lower than Kratos Defense & Security Solutions's net income of $3.2M. Notably, Mercury Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Kratos Defense & Security Solutions's PE ratio is 293.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mercury Systems is 2.83x versus 3.80x for Kratos Defense & Security Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Park Aerospace has a net margin of -8.57% compared to Mercury Systems's net margin of 12.37%. Mercury Systems's return on equity of -7.95% beat Park Aerospace's return on equity of 6.19%.

Mercury Systems has a consensus price target of $34.25, signalling downside risk potential of -18.26%. On the other hand Park Aerospace has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 88.68%. Given that Park Aerospace has higher upside potential than Mercury Systems, analysts believe Park Aerospace is more attractive than Mercury Systems.

Mercury Systems has a beta of 0.780, which suggesting that the stock is 22.001% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Park Aerospace has a beta of 0.431, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.884%.

Mercury Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Park Aerospace offers a yield of 3.63% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Mercury Systems pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Park Aerospace pays out 409.8% of its earnings as a dividend.

Mercury Systems quarterly revenues are $204.4M, which are larger than Park Aerospace quarterly revenues of $16.7M. Mercury Systems's net income of -$17.5M is lower than Park Aerospace's net income of $2.1M. Notably, Mercury Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Park Aerospace's PE ratio is 40.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mercury Systems is 2.83x versus 4.78x for Park Aerospace. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.