PAX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

The Carlyle Group has a net margin of 36.11% compared to Patria Investments's net margin of 27.34%. Patria Investments's return on equity of 14.81% beat The Carlyle Group's return on equity of 17.04%.

Patria Investments has a consensus price target of $14.92, signalling upside risk potential of 30.16%. On the other hand The Carlyle Group has an analysts' consensus of $46.52 which suggests that it could grow by 12.75%. Given that Patria Investments has higher upside potential than The Carlyle Group, analysts believe Patria Investments is more attractive than The Carlyle Group.

Patria Investments has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Carlyle Group has a beta of 1.854, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.409%.

Patria Investments has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.76%. The Carlyle Group offers a yield of 3.39% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. Patria Investments pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. The Carlyle Group pays out 49.29% of its earnings as a dividend. The Carlyle Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Patria Investments quarterly revenues are $157.3M, which are smaller than The Carlyle Group quarterly revenues of $771.3M. Patria Investments's net income of $56.8M is lower than The Carlyle Group's net income of $210.9M. Notably, Patria Investments's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.90x while The Carlyle Group's PE ratio is 14.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Patria Investments is 4.70x versus 4.46x for The Carlyle Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Diamond Hill Investment Group has a net margin of 36.11% compared to Patria Investments's net margin of 24.7%. Patria Investments's return on equity of 14.81% beat Diamond Hill Investment Group's return on equity of 24.93%.

Patria Investments has a consensus price target of $14.92, signalling upside risk potential of 30.16%. On the other hand Diamond Hill Investment Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Patria Investments has higher upside potential than Diamond Hill Investment Group, analysts believe Patria Investments is more attractive than Diamond Hill Investment Group.

Patria Investments has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Diamond Hill Investment Group has a beta of 0.752, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.85%.

Patria Investments has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.76%. Diamond Hill Investment Group offers a yield of 4.3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.50 per share. Patria Investments pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Diamond Hill Investment Group pays out 38.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Diamond Hill Investment Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Patria Investments quarterly revenues are $157.3M, which are larger than Diamond Hill Investment Group quarterly revenues of $42M. Patria Investments's net income of $56.8M is higher than Diamond Hill Investment Group's net income of $10.4M. Notably, Patria Investments's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.90x while Diamond Hill Investment Group's PE ratio is 9.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Patria Investments is 4.70x versus 2.50x for Diamond Hill Investment Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Greenlight Capital Re has a net margin of 36.11% compared to Patria Investments's net margin of -20.13%. Patria Investments's return on equity of 14.81% beat Greenlight Capital Re's return on equity of 6.79%.

Patria Investments has a consensus price target of $14.92, signalling upside risk potential of 30.16%. On the other hand Greenlight Capital Re has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 56.02%. Given that Greenlight Capital Re has higher upside potential than Patria Investments, analysts believe Greenlight Capital Re is more attractive than Patria Investments.

Patria Investments has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Greenlight Capital Re has a beta of 0.665, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.457%.

Patria Investments has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.76%. Greenlight Capital Re offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Patria Investments pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Greenlight Capital Re pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Patria Investments quarterly revenues are $157.3M, which are larger than Greenlight Capital Re quarterly revenues of $136.2M. Patria Investments's net income of $56.8M is higher than Greenlight Capital Re's net income of -$27.4M. Notably, Patria Investments's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.90x while Greenlight Capital Re's PE ratio is 11.12x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Patria Investments is 4.70x versus 0.72x for Greenlight Capital Re. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oaktree Specialty Lending has a net margin of 36.11% compared to Patria Investments's net margin of 90.2%. Patria Investments's return on equity of 14.81% beat Oaktree Specialty Lending's return on equity of 0.61%.

Patria Investments has a consensus price target of $14.92, signalling upside risk potential of 30.16%. On the other hand Oaktree Specialty Lending has an analysts' consensus of $14.10 which suggests that it could grow by 3.22%. Given that Patria Investments has higher upside potential than Oaktree Specialty Lending, analysts believe Patria Investments is more attractive than Oaktree Specialty Lending.

Patria Investments has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oaktree Specialty Lending has a beta of 0.744, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.64%.

Patria Investments has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.76%. Oaktree Specialty Lending offers a yield of 15.52% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. Patria Investments pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Oaktree Specialty Lending pays out 305.35% of its earnings as a dividend.

Patria Investments quarterly revenues are $157.3M, which are larger than Oaktree Specialty Lending quarterly revenues of -$40.2M. Patria Investments's net income of $56.8M is higher than Oaktree Specialty Lending's net income of -$36.2M. Notably, Patria Investments's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.90x while Oaktree Specialty Lending's PE ratio is 105.08x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Patria Investments is 4.70x versus 22.13x for Oaktree Specialty Lending. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.