RRGB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cheesecake Factory has a net margin of -6.87% compared to Red Robin Gourmet Burgers's net margin of 3.47%. Red Robin Gourmet Burgers's return on equity of -- beat Cheesecake Factory's return on equity of 36.82%.

Red Robin Gourmet Burgers has a consensus price target of $8.75, signalling upside risk potential of 54.32%. On the other hand Cheesecake Factory has an analysts' consensus of $49.41 which suggests that it could grow by 1.88%. Given that Red Robin Gourmet Burgers has higher upside potential than Cheesecake Factory, analysts believe Red Robin Gourmet Burgers is more attractive than Cheesecake Factory.

Red Robin Gourmet Burgers has a beta of 2.641, which suggesting that the stock is 164.109% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cheesecake Factory has a beta of 1.503, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.269%.

Red Robin Gourmet Burgers has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cheesecake Factory offers a yield of 2.23% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. Red Robin Gourmet Burgers pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cheesecake Factory pays out 52.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Cheesecake Factory's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Red Robin Gourmet Burgers quarterly revenues are $274.6M, which are smaller than Cheesecake Factory quarterly revenues of $865.5M. Red Robin Gourmet Burgers's net income of -$18.9M is lower than Cheesecake Factory's net income of $30M. Notably, Red Robin Gourmet Burgers's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Cheesecake Factory's PE ratio is 18.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Red Robin Gourmet Burgers is 0.07x versus 0.67x for Cheesecake Factory. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Denny's has a net margin of -6.87% compared to Red Robin Gourmet Burgers's net margin of 5.83%. Red Robin Gourmet Burgers's return on equity of -- beat Denny's's return on equity of --.

Red Robin Gourmet Burgers has a consensus price target of $8.75, signalling upside risk potential of 54.32%. On the other hand Denny's has an analysts' consensus of $7.93 which suggests that it could grow by 26.45%. Given that Red Robin Gourmet Burgers has higher upside potential than Denny's, analysts believe Red Robin Gourmet Burgers is more attractive than Denny's.

Red Robin Gourmet Burgers has a beta of 2.641, which suggesting that the stock is 164.109% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Denny's has a beta of 2.015, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 101.487%.

Red Robin Gourmet Burgers has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Denny's offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Red Robin Gourmet Burgers pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Denny's pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Red Robin Gourmet Burgers quarterly revenues are $274.6M, which are larger than Denny's quarterly revenues of $111.8M. Red Robin Gourmet Burgers's net income of -$18.9M is lower than Denny's's net income of $6.5M. Notably, Red Robin Gourmet Burgers's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Denny's's PE ratio is 19.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Red Robin Gourmet Burgers is 0.07x versus 0.73x for Denny's. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Brinker International has a net margin of -6.87% compared to Red Robin Gourmet Burgers's net margin of 3.38%. Red Robin Gourmet Burgers's return on equity of -- beat Brinker International's return on equity of --.

Red Robin Gourmet Burgers has a consensus price target of $8.75, signalling upside risk potential of 54.32%. On the other hand Brinker International has an analysts' consensus of $113.38 which suggests that it could fall by -13.79%. Given that Red Robin Gourmet Burgers has higher upside potential than Brinker International, analysts believe Red Robin Gourmet Burgers is more attractive than Brinker International.

Red Robin Gourmet Burgers has a beta of 2.641, which suggesting that the stock is 164.109% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Brinker International has a beta of 2.523, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 152.255%.

Red Robin Gourmet Burgers has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Brinker International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Red Robin Gourmet Burgers pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Brinker International pays out 0.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Brinker International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Red Robin Gourmet Burgers quarterly revenues are $274.6M, which are smaller than Brinker International quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Red Robin Gourmet Burgers's net income of -$18.9M is lower than Brinker International's net income of $38.5M. Notably, Red Robin Gourmet Burgers's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Brinker International's PE ratio is 33.58x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Red Robin Gourmet Burgers is 0.07x versus 1.39x for Brinker International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Texas Roadhouse has a net margin of -6.87% compared to Red Robin Gourmet Burgers's net margin of 6.63%. Red Robin Gourmet Burgers's return on equity of -- beat Texas Roadhouse's return on equity of 31.98%.

Red Robin Gourmet Burgers has a consensus price target of $8.75, signalling upside risk potential of 54.32%. On the other hand Texas Roadhouse has an analysts' consensus of $196.03 which suggests that it could grow by 8.19%. Given that Red Robin Gourmet Burgers has higher upside potential than Texas Roadhouse, analysts believe Red Robin Gourmet Burgers is more attractive than Texas Roadhouse.

Red Robin Gourmet Burgers has a beta of 2.641, which suggesting that the stock is 164.109% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Texas Roadhouse has a beta of 1.015, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.486%.

Red Robin Gourmet Burgers has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Texas Roadhouse offers a yield of 1.35% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.61 per share. Red Robin Gourmet Burgers pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Texas Roadhouse pays out 48.28% of its earnings as a dividend. Texas Roadhouse's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Red Robin Gourmet Burgers quarterly revenues are $274.6M, which are smaller than Texas Roadhouse quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Red Robin Gourmet Burgers's net income of -$18.9M is lower than Texas Roadhouse's net income of $84.4M. Notably, Red Robin Gourmet Burgers's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Texas Roadhouse's PE ratio is 31.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Red Robin Gourmet Burgers is 0.07x versus 2.38x for Texas Roadhouse. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.