EAT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Darden Restaurants has a net margin of 8.73% compared to Brinker International's net margin of 10.24%. Brinker International's return on equity of 4799.27% beat Darden Restaurants's return on equity of 48.6%.

Brinker International has a consensus price target of $179.56, signalling upside risk potential of 22.74%. On the other hand Darden Restaurants has an analysts' consensus of $207.76 which suggests that it could grow by 5.81%. Given that Brinker International has higher upside potential than Darden Restaurants, analysts believe Brinker International is more attractive than Darden Restaurants.

Brinker International has a beta of 2.206, which suggesting that the stock is 120.618% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Darden Restaurants has a beta of 0.936, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.442%.

Brinker International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Darden Restaurants offers a yield of 2.81% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.40 per share. Brinker International pays 0.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Darden Restaurants pays out 61.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Brinker International quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are smaller than Darden Restaurants quarterly revenues of $3.2B. Brinker International's net income of $118.5M is lower than Darden Restaurants's net income of $323.4M. Notably, Brinker International's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.35x while Darden Restaurants's PE ratio is 22.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brinker International is 1.39x versus 1.99x for Darden Restaurants. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kura Sushi USA has a net margin of 8.73% compared to Brinker International's net margin of -5.83%. Brinker International's return on equity of 4799.27% beat Kura Sushi USA's return on equity of -5.55%.

Brinker International has a consensus price target of $179.56, signalling upside risk potential of 22.74%. On the other hand Kura Sushi USA has an analysts' consensus of $65.33 which suggests that it could grow by 19.72%. Given that Brinker International has higher upside potential than Kura Sushi USA, analysts believe Brinker International is more attractive than Kura Sushi USA.

Brinker International has a beta of 2.206, which suggesting that the stock is 120.618% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kura Sushi USA has a beta of 1.723, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 72.252%.

Brinker International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kura Sushi USA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Brinker International pays 0.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Kura Sushi USA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Brinker International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Brinker International quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Kura Sushi USA quarterly revenues of $64.9M. Brinker International's net income of $118.5M is higher than Kura Sushi USA's net income of -$3.8M. Notably, Brinker International's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.35x while Kura Sushi USA's PE ratio is 732.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brinker International is 1.39x versus 2.43x for Kura Sushi USA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Starbucks has a net margin of 8.73% compared to Brinker International's net margin of 8.31%. Brinker International's return on equity of 4799.27% beat Starbucks's return on equity of --.

Brinker International has a consensus price target of $179.56, signalling upside risk potential of 22.74%. On the other hand Starbucks has an analysts' consensus of $105.94 which suggests that it could grow by 19.46%. Given that Brinker International has higher upside potential than Starbucks, analysts believe Brinker International is more attractive than Starbucks.

Brinker International has a beta of 2.206, which suggesting that the stock is 120.618% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Starbucks has a beta of 1.005, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.51399999999999%.

Brinker International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Starbucks offers a yield of 2.66% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.61 per share. Brinker International pays 0.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Starbucks pays out 68.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Brinker International quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are smaller than Starbucks quarterly revenues of $9.4B. Brinker International's net income of $118.5M is lower than Starbucks's net income of $780.8M. Notably, Brinker International's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.35x while Starbucks's PE ratio is 28.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brinker International is 1.39x versus 2.79x for Starbucks. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Texas Roadhouse has a net margin of 8.73% compared to Brinker International's net margin of 8.06%. Brinker International's return on equity of 4799.27% beat Texas Roadhouse's return on equity of 34.11%.

Brinker International has a consensus price target of $179.56, signalling upside risk potential of 22.74%. On the other hand Texas Roadhouse has an analysts' consensus of $189.84 which suggests that it could grow by 14.36%. Given that Brinker International has higher upside potential than Texas Roadhouse, analysts believe Brinker International is more attractive than Texas Roadhouse.

Brinker International has a beta of 2.206, which suggesting that the stock is 120.618% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Texas Roadhouse has a beta of 0.878, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.222%.

Brinker International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Texas Roadhouse offers a yield of 1.51% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share. Brinker International pays 0.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Texas Roadhouse pays out 37.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Brinker International quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are smaller than Texas Roadhouse quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Brinker International's net income of $118.5M is higher than Texas Roadhouse's net income of $115.8M. Notably, Brinker International's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.35x while Texas Roadhouse's PE ratio is 25.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brinker International is 1.39x versus 2.07x for Texas Roadhouse. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.