SBUX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cava Group has a net margin of 10.02% compared to Starbucks's net margin of 7.37%. Starbucks's return on equity of -- beat Cava Group's return on equity of 9.18%.

Starbucks has a consensus price target of $103.30, signalling upside risk potential of 12.46%. On the other hand Cava Group has an analysts' consensus of $91.64 which suggests that it could grow by 36.94%. Given that Cava Group has higher upside potential than Starbucks, analysts believe Cava Group is more attractive than Starbucks.

Starbucks has a beta of 0.971, which suggesting that the stock is 2.863% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cava Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Starbucks has a quarterly dividend of $0.61 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.53%. Cava Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Starbucks pays 68.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Cava Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Starbucks's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Starbucks quarterly revenues are $9.1B, which are larger than Cava Group quarterly revenues of $243.8M. Starbucks's net income of $909.2M is higher than Cava Group's net income of $18M. Notably, Starbucks's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.75x while Cava Group's PE ratio is 248.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Starbucks is 2.89x versus 14.66x for Cava Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Chipotle Mexican Grill has a net margin of 10.02% compared to Starbucks's net margin of 13.87%. Starbucks's return on equity of -- beat Chipotle Mexican Grill's return on equity of 44.62%.

Starbucks has a consensus price target of $103.30, signalling upside risk potential of 12.46%. On the other hand Chipotle Mexican Grill has an analysts' consensus of $58.95 which suggests that it could grow by 8%. Given that Starbucks has higher upside potential than Chipotle Mexican Grill, analysts believe Starbucks is more attractive than Chipotle Mexican Grill.

Starbucks has a beta of 0.971, which suggesting that the stock is 2.863% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chipotle Mexican Grill has a beta of 1.270, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.001%.

Starbucks has a quarterly dividend of $0.61 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.53%. Chipotle Mexican Grill offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Starbucks pays 68.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Chipotle Mexican Grill pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Starbucks's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Starbucks quarterly revenues are $9.1B, which are larger than Chipotle Mexican Grill quarterly revenues of $2.8B. Starbucks's net income of $909.2M is higher than Chipotle Mexican Grill's net income of $387.4M. Notably, Starbucks's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.75x while Chipotle Mexican Grill's PE ratio is 56.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Starbucks is 2.89x versus 7.63x for Chipotle Mexican Grill. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

McDonald's has a net margin of 10.02% compared to Starbucks's net margin of 32.81%. Starbucks's return on equity of -- beat McDonald's's return on equity of --.

Starbucks has a consensus price target of $103.30, signalling upside risk potential of 12.46%. On the other hand McDonald's has an analysts' consensus of $295.51 which suggests that it could grow by 9.06%. Given that Starbucks has higher upside potential than McDonald's, analysts believe Starbucks is more attractive than McDonald's.

Starbucks has a beta of 0.971, which suggesting that the stock is 2.863% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison McDonald's has a beta of 0.734, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.598%.

Starbucks has a quarterly dividend of $0.61 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.53%. McDonald's offers a yield of 2.3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.77 per share. Starbucks pays 68.73% of its earnings as a dividend. McDonald's pays out 53.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Starbucks quarterly revenues are $9.1B, which are larger than McDonald's quarterly revenues of $6.9B. Starbucks's net income of $909.2M is lower than McDonald's's net income of $2.3B. Notably, Starbucks's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.75x while McDonald's's PE ratio is 25.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Starbucks is 2.89x versus 8.23x for McDonald's. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Yum Brands has a net margin of 10.02% compared to Starbucks's net margin of 20.92%. Starbucks's return on equity of -- beat Yum Brands's return on equity of --.

Starbucks has a consensus price target of $103.30, signalling upside risk potential of 12.46%. On the other hand Yum Brands has an analysts' consensus of $145.81 which suggests that it could grow by 5.79%. Given that Starbucks has higher upside potential than Yum Brands, analysts believe Starbucks is more attractive than Yum Brands.

Starbucks has a beta of 0.971, which suggesting that the stock is 2.863% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Yum Brands has a beta of 1.103, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.305%.

Starbucks has a quarterly dividend of $0.61 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.53%. Yum Brands offers a yield of 1.97% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.67 per share. Starbucks pays 68.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Yum Brands pays out 42.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Starbucks quarterly revenues are $9.1B, which are larger than Yum Brands quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Starbucks's net income of $909.2M is higher than Yum Brands's net income of $382M. Notably, Starbucks's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.75x while Yum Brands's PE ratio is 25.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Starbucks is 2.89x versus 5.36x for Yum Brands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.