DRI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Brinker International has a net margin of 10.24% compared to Darden Restaurants's net margin of 8.73%. Darden Restaurants's return on equity of 48.6% beat Brinker International's return on equity of 4799.27%.

Darden Restaurants has a consensus price target of $208.25, signalling upside risk potential of 3.77%. On the other hand Brinker International has an analysts' consensus of $183.06 which suggests that it could grow by 31.99%. Given that Brinker International has higher upside potential than Darden Restaurants, analysts believe Brinker International is more attractive than Darden Restaurants.

Darden Restaurants has a beta of 0.936, which suggesting that the stock is 6.442% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Brinker International has a beta of 2.206, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 120.618%.

Darden Restaurants has a quarterly dividend of $1.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.75%. Brinker International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Darden Restaurants pays 61.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Brinker International pays out 0.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Darden Restaurants quarterly revenues are $3.2B, which are larger than Brinker International quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Darden Restaurants's net income of $323.4M is higher than Brinker International's net income of $118.5M. Notably, Darden Restaurants's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.62x while Brinker International's PE ratio is 24.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Darden Restaurants is 2.03x versus 1.32x for Brinker International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Texas Roadhouse has a net margin of 10.24% compared to Darden Restaurants's net margin of 8.06%. Darden Restaurants's return on equity of 48.6% beat Texas Roadhouse's return on equity of 34.11%.

Darden Restaurants has a consensus price target of $208.25, signalling upside risk potential of 3.77%. On the other hand Texas Roadhouse has an analysts' consensus of $191.57 which suggests that it could grow by 14.68%. Given that Texas Roadhouse has higher upside potential than Darden Restaurants, analysts believe Texas Roadhouse is more attractive than Darden Restaurants.

Darden Restaurants has a beta of 0.936, which suggesting that the stock is 6.442% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Texas Roadhouse has a beta of 0.878, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.222%.

Darden Restaurants has a quarterly dividend of $1.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.75%. Texas Roadhouse offers a yield of 1.5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share. Darden Restaurants pays 61.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Texas Roadhouse pays out 37.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Darden Restaurants quarterly revenues are $3.2B, which are larger than Texas Roadhouse quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Darden Restaurants's net income of $323.4M is higher than Texas Roadhouse's net income of $115.8M. Notably, Darden Restaurants's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.62x while Texas Roadhouse's PE ratio is 25.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Darden Restaurants is 2.03x versus 2.08x for Texas Roadhouse. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Wingstop has a net margin of 10.24% compared to Darden Restaurants's net margin of 16.53%. Darden Restaurants's return on equity of 48.6% beat Wingstop's return on equity of --.

Darden Restaurants has a consensus price target of $208.25, signalling upside risk potential of 3.77%. On the other hand Wingstop has an analysts' consensus of $312.51 which suggests that it could grow by 28.72%. Given that Wingstop has higher upside potential than Darden Restaurants, analysts believe Wingstop is more attractive than Darden Restaurants.

Darden Restaurants has a beta of 0.936, which suggesting that the stock is 6.442% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Wingstop has a beta of 2.017, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 101.691%.

Darden Restaurants has a quarterly dividend of $1.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.75%. Wingstop offers a yield of 0.42% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. Darden Restaurants pays 61.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Wingstop pays out 26.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Darden Restaurants quarterly revenues are $3.2B, which are larger than Wingstop quarterly revenues of $161.8M. Darden Restaurants's net income of $323.4M is higher than Wingstop's net income of $26.8M. Notably, Darden Restaurants's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.62x while Wingstop's PE ratio is 65.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Darden Restaurants is 2.03x versus 11.40x for Wingstop. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Yum Brands has a net margin of 10.24% compared to Darden Restaurants's net margin of 17.91%. Darden Restaurants's return on equity of 48.6% beat Yum Brands's return on equity of --.

Darden Restaurants has a consensus price target of $208.25, signalling upside risk potential of 3.77%. On the other hand Yum Brands has an analysts' consensus of $155.75 which suggests that it could fall by -3.53%. Given that Darden Restaurants has higher upside potential than Yum Brands, analysts believe Darden Restaurants is more attractive than Yum Brands.

Darden Restaurants has a beta of 0.936, which suggesting that the stock is 6.442% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Yum Brands has a beta of 0.895, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.487%.

Darden Restaurants has a quarterly dividend of $1.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.75%. Yum Brands offers a yield of 1.69% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.71 per share. Darden Restaurants pays 61.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Yum Brands pays out 50.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Darden Restaurants quarterly revenues are $3.2B, which are larger than Yum Brands quarterly revenues of $2.4B. Darden Restaurants's net income of $323.4M is lower than Yum Brands's net income of $423M. Notably, Darden Restaurants's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.62x while Yum Brands's PE ratio is 30.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Darden Restaurants is 2.03x versus 6.11x for Yum Brands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.