WING Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Noodles & has a net margin of 15.84% compared to Wingstop's net margin of -5.5%. Wingstop's return on equity of -- beat Noodles &'s return on equity of -171.96%.

Wingstop has a consensus price target of $342.78, signalling upside risk potential of 27.87%. On the other hand Noodles & has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 418.31%. Given that Noodles & has higher upside potential than Wingstop, analysts believe Noodles & is more attractive than Wingstop.

Wingstop has a beta of 1.807, which suggesting that the stock is 80.73% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Noodles & has a beta of 1.602, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.213%.

Wingstop has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.35%. Noodles & offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Wingstop pays 35.49% of its earnings as a dividend. Noodles & pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Wingstop's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Wingstop quarterly revenues are $162.5M, which are larger than Noodles & quarterly revenues of $122.8M. Wingstop's net income of $25.7M is higher than Noodles &'s net income of -$6.8M. Notably, Wingstop's price-to-earnings ratio is 82.86x while Noodles &'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Wingstop is 14.17x versus 0.05x for Noodles &. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sweetgreen has a net margin of 15.84% compared to Wingstop's net margin of -12%. Wingstop's return on equity of -- beat Sweetgreen's return on equity of -18.6%.

Wingstop has a consensus price target of $342.78, signalling upside risk potential of 27.87%. On the other hand Sweetgreen has an analysts' consensus of $37.20 which suggests that it could grow by 29.76%. Given that Sweetgreen has higher upside potential than Wingstop, analysts believe Sweetgreen is more attractive than Wingstop.

Wingstop has a beta of 1.807, which suggesting that the stock is 80.73% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sweetgreen has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Wingstop has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.35%. Sweetgreen offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Wingstop pays 35.49% of its earnings as a dividend. Sweetgreen pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Wingstop's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Wingstop quarterly revenues are $162.5M, which are smaller than Sweetgreen quarterly revenues of $173.4M. Wingstop's net income of $25.7M is higher than Sweetgreen's net income of -$20.8M. Notably, Wingstop's price-to-earnings ratio is 82.86x while Sweetgreen's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Wingstop is 14.17x versus 5.44x for Sweetgreen. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Shake Shack has a net margin of 15.84% compared to Wingstop's net margin of -3.22%. Wingstop's return on equity of -- beat Shake Shack's return on equity of 1.86%.

Wingstop has a consensus price target of $342.78, signalling upside risk potential of 27.87%. On the other hand Shake Shack has an analysts' consensus of $131.86 which suggests that it could grow by 1.59%. Given that Wingstop has higher upside potential than Shake Shack, analysts believe Wingstop is more attractive than Shake Shack.

Wingstop has a beta of 1.807, which suggesting that the stock is 80.73% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Shake Shack has a beta of 1.860, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.994%.

Wingstop has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.35%. Shake Shack offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Wingstop pays 35.49% of its earnings as a dividend. Shake Shack pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Wingstop's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Wingstop quarterly revenues are $162.5M, which are smaller than Shake Shack quarterly revenues of $316.9M. Wingstop's net income of $25.7M is higher than Shake Shack's net income of -$10.2M. Notably, Wingstop's price-to-earnings ratio is 82.86x while Shake Shack's PE ratio is 763.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Wingstop is 14.17x versus 4.47x for Shake Shack. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Texas Roadhouse has a net margin of 15.84% compared to Wingstop's net margin of 6.63%. Wingstop's return on equity of -- beat Texas Roadhouse's return on equity of 31.98%.

Wingstop has a consensus price target of $342.78, signalling upside risk potential of 27.87%. On the other hand Texas Roadhouse has an analysts' consensus of $196.03 which suggests that it could grow by 8.65%. Given that Wingstop has higher upside potential than Texas Roadhouse, analysts believe Wingstop is more attractive than Texas Roadhouse.

Wingstop has a beta of 1.807, which suggesting that the stock is 80.73% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Texas Roadhouse has a beta of 1.015, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.486%.

Wingstop has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.35%. Texas Roadhouse offers a yield of 1.35% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.61 per share. Wingstop pays 35.49% of its earnings as a dividend. Texas Roadhouse pays out 48.28% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Wingstop quarterly revenues are $162.5M, which are smaller than Texas Roadhouse quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Wingstop's net income of $25.7M is lower than Texas Roadhouse's net income of $84.4M. Notably, Wingstop's price-to-earnings ratio is 82.86x while Texas Roadhouse's PE ratio is 31.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Wingstop is 14.17x versus 2.37x for Texas Roadhouse. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.